The following is a researched list of combat reports submitted by Air Crew from 75(NZ) Squadron RAF.

Reading through these reports 3 things are clear:
Firstly, in some cases the report simply refers to an encounter with an enemy aircraft, combat as such did not actually take place.

Secondly, it would appear there is a high level of duplication within the series. Often an identical document exists under its own serial, which is attributed to a Pilot and/ or an Air Gunner, but it contains the same report. I make this observation, as this was what sparked me initially to undertake this research and present a summary for each document held by the National Archives at Kew.

Thirdly, in some cases there appears to be a contradictory or alternative narrative in the FORM 541 Diary of work carried out record. Ultimately, there is no way to reconcile these discrepancies – though I note it simply to stop a reader finding it as an issue.

The scale and complexity of the total number of documents that Kew holds means that even as presented (in places there are errors in crew names, rank and also dates/ targets), it is perhaps more than could be expected for what in the scale of things, is a very small and despite our high regard for 75(NZ) Squadron RAF, a very niche category.

Thus, my intention with this reference list is to firstly try to clarify the dating and nature of each report and perhaps most importantly to save anybody who finds a report of interest, the trouble of paying twice – or in one instance found so far, 4 times – for the exact same document.

I am still processing and working slowly through the AIR50/192 range, I will try to list the series in numerical order, where appropriate, multiple references are still listed, but the duplicates are reduced in content to aid navigation. Having worked through the AIR50/192 set, I would make the following observations:

1.) The reports maintain a fairy consistent format. Early reports tend to list a date that is usually at least a day out regarding the actual date of combat.

2.) Latterly, there is not a recorded date for the creation of the report – in most cases the date corresponds with the date of combat.

3.) There is a set of 3 reports (generated based on recorded participants) that involved Edgar Burke’s crew. This combat took place on the 5th of January 1944 and sits, chronologically bewtween AIR50/192/219 and AIR50/192/220.

4.) Towards the end of the series, the format of the reports seem to completely change. The format changes to a lengthy response to set questions or choices – the existence of a narrative report is not consistent through these reports.

5.) AIR50/192 is certainly not exhaustive. The final 2 dates listed of the series (based on the online list for this series) is AIR50/192/235, 22nd/ 23rd of April 1944 and AIR50/192/236, the 26th/ 27th of April 1944. Based on the set I have researched, there is an additional report between these 2 dates. In addition, there are a further 15, double page documents, finishing on the 29th of August 1944 that do not appear to be listed by the National Archives.

6.) Additionally, within the Squadron Appendices (AIR27/649), there are a further 5 Combat Reports, the first being 6th of November 1944, the last, 14/15th of April 1945.

I am indebted to Steve Smith, 218 (Gold Coast) Squadron, archivist, historian and author for assisting me in the provision of the source material that this analysis is based on.

In places, the documents are simply unreadable and even with multiple copies of the report, I have been unable to even make a sensible assumption about the word or phrase in question – these are in the most part numerical and relate to specific distances or bearings. In these cases capitalised X’s are used to denote this. Where I have made an informed guess, the word or number is ended with a question mark.

Whilst transcribing these records, a number of abbreviations and acronyms have kept appearing, so for the sake of an easier reading experience, a small glossary:

Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations:
A/C – Aircraft.

Boozer – An early form of target/ E/A identification radar.

Bow – the front of the aircraft.

Corkscrew – A standard defensive manoeuvre. On sighting of an enemy aircraft, the instruction to the Pilot to corkscrew could be made by any member of the crew and the response was instant. A diving and banking manoeuvre, the intention was to align the relevant Gunner for a defensive burst before steering the bomber away from the attack.

E/A – Enemy Aircraft.

Flak – from the German, Fliegerabwehrkanone – “aircraft defence cannon”. A collective term for ground based artillery and shells used to mount a barrage of exploding shells as a defense against attacking bombers. A common misconception is that the aim of the German Anti-Aircraft (Ack-Ack) batteries was to hit the bombers above, instead, altitude triggered fuses were used to approximate a point of detonation level with the attacking aircraft, which would then produce a spherical shrapnel cloud which could potentially damage more than one aircraft.

I.A.S. – Indicated air speed, is simply the value that an airspeed indicator denotes on its scale (literally the speedometer). Indicated airspeed is used aerodynamically, and is important to aircraft performance. Speeds related to take-off, stall, lift, turns, etc. are all in terms of I.A.S.

I.F.F. – Identification, Friend or Foe. A transmission/ reception system intended to identify ‘friendly’ aircraft. In practicality, the system had to be used VERY carefully, as the signal could be picked up by the German air defence – thus actually attracting the very thing you were trying to avoid.

M, or Mag. – refers to the direction of travel, relative to Magnetic North, as opposed to True
North.

Port – the left hand side of the aircraft.

S/E – Single engined

S/L – Search lights. Usually positioned as part of an air defense system around cities or areas of industry, the job was simply to illuminate or ‘paint’ an aircraft to allow either ground based anti aircraft artillery or night fighters to be guided to the target aircraft.

Starboard – the right hand side of the aircraft.

Stern – the rear or back of the aircraft.

Combat Reports – The bigger picture
I am also aware that perhaps for someone entering this new world, the problem is not accessing information, but rather, knowing what information to look for. To this end and with no intention of gratuitously extending this preface to the Combat Record section I also include the following regarding German aircraft mentioned in the Combat Reports and also a very brief exploration of aspects of the German Air Defense and Nachtjagd (night fighter) strategies. There are some very good and very detailed articles on Wikipedia and when and where appropriate I have added links to expand the albeit quite superficial narrative that follows.

Luftwaffe aircraft
What follows is a brief description of the German aircraft that are referred to in the Combat Reports – I would acknowledge to the purists of this field, that in some cases, the names/ nomenclature of the aircraft discussed are not technically correct – but for ease of identification within the CR’s I use the titling within the reports.

Ju.88
The Junkers Ju 88 was a German World War II Luftwaffe twin-engined multirole combat aircraft. Designed by Junkers Flugzeug- und Motorenwerke (JFM) in the mid-1930s to be a so-called Schnellbomber (“fast bomber”) which would be too fast for any of the fighters of its era to intercept, it suffered from a number of technical problems during the later stages of its development and early operational roles, but became one of the most versatile combat aircraft of the war. Like a number of other Luftwaffe bombers, it was used successfully as a bomber, dive bomber, night fighter, torpedo bomber, reconnaissance aircraft, heavy fighter and even, during the closing stages of the conflict in Europe, as a flying bomb.

Despite its protracted development, the aircraft became one of the Luftwaffe’s most important assets. The assembly line ran constantly from 1936 to 1945, and more than 16,000 Ju 88s were built in dozens of variants, more than any other twin-engine German aircraft of the period. Throughout the production, the basic structure of the aircraft remained unchanged.
read more here

Me.109
The Messerschmitt Bf 109, commonly called the Me 109 (most often by Allied aircrew and even amongst the German aces themselves, even though this was not the official German designation), is a German World War II fighter aircraft designed by Willy Messerschmitt and Robert Lusser during the early to mid-1930s. The Bf 109 first saw operational service during the Spanish Civil War and was still in service at the dawn of the jet age at the end of World War II, during which time it was the backbone of the Luftwaffe’s fighter force. From the end of 1941, the Bf 109 was steadily being supplemented by the superior Focke-Wulf Fw 190.

Originally conceived as an interceptor, later models were developed to fulfill multiple tasks, serving as bomber escort, fighter-bomber, day-, night-, all-weather fighter, ground-attack aircraft, and as reconnaissance aircraft. It was supplied to and operated by several states during World War II, and served with several countries for many years after the war. The Bf 109 was the most produced fighter aircraft in history, with a total of 33,984 air frames produced from 1936 up to April 1945.
read more here.

ME.110
The Messerschmitt Bf 110, often called Me 110, was a twin-engine heavy fighter (Zerstörer-German for “Destroyer”) and fighter-bomber (Jagdbomber or Jabo) developed in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and used by the Luftwaffe and others during World War II. Hermann Göring was a proponent of the Bf 110. It was armed with two MG FF 20 mm cannons, four 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 17 machine guns, and one 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 15 machine gun or twin-barrel MG 81Z for defence. Development work on an improved type to replace the Bf 110, the Messerschmitt Me 210 began before the war started, but its teething troubles from its aerodynamics resulted in the Bf 110 soldiering on until the end of the war in various roles, alongside its replacements, the Me 210 and the significantly improved Me 410 Hornisse.

The Bf 110 served with considerable initial success in the early campaigns, the Polish, Norwegian and Battle of France. The primary weakness of the Bf 110 was its lack of agility in the air, although this could be mitigated with the correct tactics. This flaw was however exposed and mercilessly exploited when flying as close escort to German bombers during the Battle of Britain. When British bombers began targeting German territory with nightly raids, some Bf 110-equipped units were withdrawn and redeployed as night fighters, a role to which the aircraft was well suited. After the Battle of Britain the Bf 110 enjoyed a successful period as an air superiority fighter and strike aircraft in other theatres.
read more here.

F.W. 190
The Focke-Wulf Fw 190 Würger was used by the Luftwaffe during the Second World War in a variety of roles. Like the Messerschmitt Bf 109, the Fw 190 was employed as a “workhorse”, and proved suitable for a wide variety of roles, including air superiority fighter, strike fighter, ground-attack aircraft, escort fighter, and operated with less success as a night fighter. It served on all the German fronts: Eastern Front, Western Front, North African Campaign and the Defence of the Reich. The fighter and its pilots proved just as capable as the Bf 109 in aerial combat, and in the opinion of German pilots who had flown both fighters, the Fw 190 presented increased firepower and manoeuvrability at low to medium altitude.

The Fw 190 became the backbone of Jagdwaffe (Fighter Force) along with the Bf 109. On the Eastern Front, owing to its versatility, the Fw 190 was used in Schlachtgeschwader (Attack Wings) which were specialised ground attack units. The units achieved much success against Soviet ground forces. As an interceptor, the Fw 190 underwent improvements to make it effective at high altitude, allowing the 190 to maintain relative parity with its Allied counterparts. The Fw 190A series’ performance decreased at high altitudes (usually 6,000 m (20,000 ft) and above), which reduced its usefulness as a high-altitude fighter, but these complications were mostly rectified in later models, notably the Focke-Wulf Fw 190D variant, which was introduced in September 1944. In spite of its successes, it never entirely replaced the Bf 109. The Fw 190 was well liked by its pilots. Some of the Luftwaffe‘s most successful fighter aces flew the Fw 190, including Otto Kittel with 267 victories, Walter Nowotny with 258, and Erich Rudorffer with 222 claimed. A great many of their kills were claimed while flying the Fw 190.
read more here.

AIR 50/192 Combat Report Series – 75(NZ) Squadron RAF

In preparing the following list, I have, for the majority of Combat Reports, used the National Archive’s AIR series reference. However, whilst gathering available documents, it has become clear that (i) a significant number of reports relating to the Squadron exist that are not covered by this nomenclature, (ii) there appears to be a secondary, overarching, numbering that has/ was applied to the physical documents (iii) that if this numbering system is taken to be representative, a large portion of Combat Reports are ‘missing’.

For each report I have generated preface information for ordering, context and speed of analysis. Where it exists, the report is first referenced, relative to the physical report numbering that can be found on all reports so far gathered. Secondarily, the National Archive AIR reference is quoted – where this does not exist, the alternative location of the document is cited.

Document No. 1 (AIR 50/192/1)
Date of Report: 18th of December 1941
Date of Combat: 17th of December 1941 – Bombing Attacks Against Targets at Brest and Le Havre
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Unnamed,
Position: N/A
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.Ic – AA – Y

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Seven Wellington Ic aircraft were detailed from this Unit to carry out the above attacks. Bomb load consisted of 500lbs, 250lbs and containers of incendiaries. Bombs were dropped in the target area but results were not observed. Light and heavy flak was encountered and many searchlights were active but ineffective owing to low cloud. Visibility was fair but 10/10 cloud over target area. Navigation was good. Wellington Z.1083, captained by Sgt. Climie, landed at Exeter on return to get medical aid to P/O Gunning who was injured whilst the aircraft was over target.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 17th of December 1941
Wellington Ic ‘Y’/75 Night 17/18 December. Near Le Havre 1910 hours, 11,500 feet, on course 340 degrees. I.A.S. 140. Bombs jettisoned after combat. S/E a/c, no lights, approached from starboard bow above in dive, firing a short burst. Pilot was on look-out for fighter as 12 flares had previously been shot up from the ground at about 1 minute intervals, and had been illuminating a/c. There was no flak and a/c was not held in S/L’s

2. E/A was seen just before attack, and pilot turned towards attack in dive. E/A passed to port quarter and disappeared.

3. IFF was not on.

4. Our a/c did not fire.

Document No. 2 (AIR 50/192/1 (part 2)
50/192/1 contains 2 different Combat Reports, for the purpose of clarity I have split it in 2 to the format of this section.

Date of Combat: 27th of December 1941 – Bombing Attacks Against Targets at Brest and Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: W/C Reginald Sawrey-Cookson, RAF 39574
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.Ic Z.1077 AA – N

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve Wellington Ic aircraft from this Unit were detailed to carry out the above attacks. Bomb load consisted of 4000lbs, 1000lbs, 250lbs and containers of incendiaries. Bombs were seen to burst in town and railway station at Dusseldorf. Intense heavy flak was encountered over target areas and large concentrations of searchlights were active. Weather was good with very good visibility over target area. Navigation was good. Wellington Z.8971, captained by Sgt. Machin, crashed near Dartmoor owing to the port engine failing. The entire crew baled out safely.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: some damage caused

Combat report for the 27th of December 1941
Wellington Ic ‘N’ 75 Squadron Z1077 on night 27-28th December, 1941 when on outward journey to Dusseldorf with bombs still on board was approximately 3 miles north of EINDHOVEN at 1850 hours 10,000 ft 150 I.A.S. course 103M. There was no cloud and the moon was in the south. There was no flak, no S/L activity, and our A/C did not have the I.F.F. on. An M.E. 110 (with no lights) was seen 300 yards astern and at some height approaching our A/C. Our F/G opened fire at about 150 yards range and the E/A came in on the port quarter and opened fire with multi guns but using no tracer, and broke away again at about 50 yards. It then crossed over and came in again, on the starboard quarter and this time our R/G got in a good burst at about 50 yards range, and claims that he must have caused some damage to the E/A which disappeared without making any further attacks. Our R/G fired a total of 800 rounds from each gun during the encounter. No damage was sustained by our A/C

Document No. 3 (AIR 50/192/2)
Date of Report: 13th of February 1942
Date of Combat: 12th of February 1942 – Attacks Against German Battleships in the Channel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O James Kenneth Climie, RNZAF NZ403561
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3390 AA – W

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Two Wellington III aircraft from this unit were detailed to carry out the above attack. Bomb load consisted of 500 lbs G.P. Owing to very bad weather, 10/10 cloud and rain in large areas, the ships were not bombed. The bomb load was returned to base. Wellington aircraft X3390 encountered fierce light A.A. Fire from two destroyers on two occasions. Fire being returned by the rear gunner. This aircraft also attacked by two ME 109’s but sustained no damage. Navigation was entirely by D.R. The whole operation was marred by very poor visibility and low cloud. Wellington X3475 was also detailed to carry out an attack on the above target but the vessels were not contacted owing to darkness and adverse weather conditions. Several unidentified aircraft were seen. A.A. Fire was observed over clouds.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 2 x Me.110 (ORB lists 2 Me109’s)
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 12th of February 1942
Wellington Mark III, “W” 75 Squadron X3390, Captain P/O Climie, on the afternoon of 12th February, 1942 had reached a position 52° 12′ N, 05° 31′ E in a search for the Battle Cruisers when at 1635 hours while flying at 500 feet at 160 T.A.S. course 180° M, and with bombs still on board our aircraft was attacked. The cloud base was at 1,000 feet and with heavy rain visibility was poor. I.F.F. was not on at the time. Two Me.110, flying line astern, made the attack from about 500 feet above rear quarter (just on the cloud base) at 150 yds. range. Each E/A made a single attack with Red tracer and their fire was the first indication to our R/G of the presence of hostile aircraft.
Unfortunately, all the guns in the rear turret of the Wellington were serviceable, and the only course open to our aircraft was to gain cloud cover. This was accomplished by a dive followed by steep climbs and turns during which it was impossible to estimate the range at which the E/A ceased fire.
No damage was sustained by our aircraft.
The rear gunner was Sgt. C. Archer.

Document No. 3 (AIR 50/192/3 – REPORT AS ABOVE.)
Date of Report: 13th of February 1942
Date of Combat: 12th of February 1942 – Attacks Against German Battleships in the Channel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. George Walter Matthew Archer, RAFVR 1355706
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3390 AA – W

Document No. 4 (AIR 50/192/4)
Date of Report: 14th March 1942
Date of Combat: 12th March 1942 – Attack Against Kiel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. Raymond John Newton, RNZAF NZ40984
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3586 AA – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight Wellington aircraft carried out an attack against the above target, one aircraft, captained by Sgt Bell did not carry out an attack. Three aircraft captained by S/L Kitchin, F/O Sandys and Sgt Parnham failed to return to base. Bomb load consisted of 1,000 lbs, 500 lbs and 250 lbs was dropped in the target area, bomb bursts being observed. There was heavy and light predicted flak and large cones of searchlights in the target area and one twin engined enemy aircraft made one unsuccessful attack on Wellington III X3586 captained by S/L Newton. Weather was clear over the target with 5/10 cloud over North Sea. Navigation was by D.R. and TR1335.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Twin engined aircraft
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 12th March 1942
Wellington Mark III. A. 75 Squadron X3586 Captain Squadron Leader Newton on 12th March when returning from Kiel after dropping its load was just East of Pellworm at 2310 and at 10,000ft 160 I.A.S. course 240deg Mag.

There was no cloud and no moon. The I.F.F. was not switched on. A twin-engined aircraft without lights approached from below and slightly to port. At 75 yards range, it fired a short burst but nowhere near our aircraft which dived to port and the enemy aircraft disappeared. Our rear gunner did not open fire. The rear gunner was Pilot Officer Fenton

Document No. 4 (AIR 50/192/5 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 14th of March 1942
Date of Combat: 12th March 1942 – Attack Against Kiel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Walter Gordon Fenton, RNZAF NZ391838
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3586 AA – A

Document No. 5 (AIR 50/192/6)
Date of Report: 31st March 1942
Date of Combat: 28th March 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Lubeck
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Evans, RAF
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3482 AA – J

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Ten Wellington aircraft took off to attack the above target, one aircraft, Wellington III X3462 captained by Sgt Bell failed to return to base. Bomb load consisting of 4,000 lbs, 1,000 lbs, 500 lbs, 250 lbs, and containers of incendiaries was dropped in the target area. Bombs were seen to burst on target and large fires were seen burning in the target area. Weather was clear except for slight haze over west portion of the North Sea. There was very little A.A. Fire and few searchlights over the target. No enemy aircraft were seen. Navigation by TR1335 and D.R. was good. he whole operation was very successful.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 28th March 1942
Night 28/29. 3/4 moon, perfect visibility. 53. 48N 0504 E 2102 hrs 11000 ft. Wellington III j/75 previous yo bombing on a course of 080° and with I.A.S of 140 saw 2 streams of tracer fired horizontally at another a/c which went down in the sea and burnt furiously on the water. Immediately after tracer was fired at J/75 from the starboard beam to starboard and the tracer passed astern of the R/Turret. Almost at once attacks developed from starboard and port quarters simultaneously. The captain turned to port and continued to do so down to 3,500 ft and E/A disappeared.

2. At this height the a/c passed over the burning a/c on the water which was thought to be a Wellington. J/75 did not fire. No damage to a/c. No I.F.F.

Document No. 6 (AIR 50/192/7)
Date of Report: 7th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 6th of April 1942 – Attack Against Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Ivor John McLachlan, RNZAF NZ404390
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3705 AA – F

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nine Wellington Aircraft from this unit were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 500lbs, and 250lbs and 4lb incendiaries was dropped but results were not observed. There was intense heavy flak and many searchlights were active but ineffective owing to the bright moonlight. One Ju.88 aircraft was seen near the target and Wellington III X3705 was attacked by a Me.110 near Liege without result. Weather was good and navigation by TR1335 and D.R was also good. One aircraft did not carry out it’s mission and two are missing. Wellington III X3489, captained by W/Cdr Sawrey-Cookson the C.O. of the squadron, and Wellington III X3661 captained by F/S Thomas.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 6th of April 1942
Wellington Mark III, F of No. 75 Squadron, on the night of 5/6th April, was returning from COLOGNE when, just South of ROCHEFORT at 0257 hours, flying at 10,000 feet on a course of 262° and at I.A.S. of 180, a Me.109 approached from 500yards ahead and slightly to port. The Captain, F/Sgt. McLAUGHLAN, turned to port and the enemy aircraft dived below and fired a short burst. it again attacked from ahead and our Front Gunner, Sergt. WALTON, fired about 100 rounds and the Rear Gunner, F/Sgt. McGREGOR, two bursts of about 500 rounds, when the enemy aircraft dived away astern. The enemy aircraft was clearly seen with the moon lighting up the cloud tops below.

2. There were no searchlights or flak at the time.

3. No damage sustained by our aircraft.

Document No. 6 (AIR 50/192/8 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 7th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 6th April 1942 – Attack Against Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Ian McGregor, RNZAF NZ401461
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3705 AA – F

Document No. 7 (NOT LISTED IN AIR SERIES)
Appears to be a blank combat form, similar in general layout to the later, non narrative documents that exist at the end of this series.

COMBAT REPORT FORM
Part I. DESCRIPTIVE

No portion of this document has been completed.

Document No. 8 (AIR 50/192/9)
Date of Report: 25th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 23rd of April 1942 – Operations – Attack Against Targets at Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Desmond Stewart Tutty, RNZAF NZ404576
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3705 AA – F

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Ten Well.III a\c were detailed attack the above targets. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 100lbs, 500lbs, 250lbs, 30lb and 4lb incendiaries was dropped in the target area but no results seen owing to cloud. There were only a few searchlights active and A.A. fire was slight. Well.III, X3487 captained by P/O Jarman was attacked by a JU.88 which attacked once and broke away to port. The results of this short attack were however serious the second pilot, P/O Nicol being mortally wounded, the rear gunner Sgt. Harris being killed and the Navigator Sgt. Taylor and W/Op. Sgt. Fernie were wounded. The bomb load was not dropped on the target but was dropped in the sea. The a/c was brought back to base and crash landed. Well.III, X3705, captained by F/S. McLachlan, was also attacked and the second pilot killed (P/O. Fountain) and Sgt. Tutty was wounded. F/Sgt. McLachlan managed to reach base and crash land.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: 2nd Pilot killed, Rear Gunner injured. Hydraulics and both T.R sets put out of action – forced belly landing on return.
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 25th of April 1942
Night 22/23 April. Wellington Mk.III ‘F’ 75 Sqd. F/Sgt McLachlan

Givet 0140 hours 12,000 ft on heading 310° after bombing. One single vertical stationary s/l was seen about 20 miles to starboard and a/c was weaving above patchy cloud. The moon was ahead and slightly to port. Without warning m.g. bullets entered a/c from below astern wounding the R/G Sgt. Tutty and killing the 2nd Pilot at the Astrohatch. The Captain at once pulled the a/c up and saw two streams of tracer pass underneath in front. This was the only attack and no a/c was seen. E/A had no cannon. Hydraulics, both T.R. sets were u/s. A/c did good belly landing at base I.F.F. not on.

Document No. 8 (AIR 50/192/10 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 25th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 23rd of April 1942 – Operations – Attack Against Targets at Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Ivor John McLachlan, RNZAF NZ404390
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3705 AA – F

Document No. 9 (NOT LISTED IN AIR SERIES)
Appears to be a blank combat form, similar in general layout to the later, non narrative documents that exist at the end of this series.

COMBAT REPORT FORM
Part III. TACTICS (continued)

No portion of this document has been completed.

Document No.8 (AIR 50/192/11) *this report exists on the same page/ document as the previous CR relating to the McLachlan crew (AIR 50/192/9 & 10)
Date of Report: 25th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 23rd of April 1942 – Operations – Attack Against Targets at Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Eric George Delancey Jarman, RAAF AUS.404507
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3487 AA – O

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Ten Well.III a\c were detailed attack the above targets. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 100lbs, 500lbs, 250lbs, 30lb and 4lb incendiaries was dropped in the target area but no results seen owing to cloud. There were only a few searchlights active and A.A. fire was slight. Well.III, X3487 captained by P/O Jarman was attacked by a JU.88 which attacked once and broke away to port. The results of this short attack were however serious the second pilot, P/O Nicol being mortally wounded, the rear gunner Sgt. Harris being killed and the Navigator Sgt. Taylor and W/Op. Sgt. Fernie were wounded. The bomb load was not dropped on the target but was dropped in the sea. The a/c was brought back to base and crash landed. Well.III, X3705, captained by F/S. McLachlan, was also attacked and the second pilot killed (P/O. Fountain) and Sgt. Tutty was wounded. F/Sgt. McLachlan managed to reach base and crash land.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: Rear Gunner killed, 2nd Pilot injured (subsequently died). A/C belly landed on return owing to damage to hydraulics and other instruments.
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 25th of April 1942
Wellington Mk.III. ‘O’ 75 Sqd. P/O Jarman

Givet 0148 hours 11,000 ft. On heading 316°. Moon ahead slightly to port with 4,000lb bomb which had hung up. Navigator and W/ Operators had been wounded by flak over Koln and F/ Gunner injured by broken perspex. The first warning was when R/Gunner told Captain to dive to starboard and almost immediately E/A opened fire from below on starboard quarter with one long burst killing the R/Gunner, Sgt. Harris, and wounding the 2nd Pilot at the Astrohatch. He died later. As our a/c dived to starboard a JU.88 was seen swinging away on port side and was not seen again. Bomb was jettisoned manually over the sea and a/c belly landed at base with hydraulics and some of the instruments u/s. No. I.F.F. No flak No S.Ls.

Document No.8 (AIR 50/192/12 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 25th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 23rd of April 1942 – Operations – Attack Against Targets at Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Richard James Harris, RNZAF NZ402999
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3487 AA – O

Document No.10 (AIR 50/192/13)
Date of Report: 27th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 26th of April 1942 – Operations – Attack Against at Rostock and Dunkirk
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. Raymond John Newton, RNZAF NZ40984
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3586 AA – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Seven Well.III a/c were detailed to attack the above targets. Bomb load of 1000lbs, 500lbs, 250lbs and 4lb incendiaries was dropped in the target area and fires were seen burning fiercely. Bombs were seen to burst across aiming point . A.A. fire was only slight and searchlights few. One enemy a/c was seen near Dunkirk. Weather was very clear with slight ground haze. Navigation was quite good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 26th of April 1942
On the night 25/26th April, 1942 a Wellington Mk.III ‘A’ 75 Squadron, Squadron Leader Newton, was crossing Langeland Belt on the way to Rostock I.A.S. 170 on a course 140° and a height of 8,500 ft. when a JU 88 approached from 100 yds astern and above, with flaps and undercarriage down. The E/A fired a burst of cannon, out A/C dived to port and the E/A was not seen again.

2. the moon was on the starboard beam. There was no flak and no S/Ls.

Document No. 11 (NOT LISTED IN AIR SERIES)
Appears to be a blank combat form, similar in general layout to the later, non narrative documents that exist at the end of this series.

COMBAT REPORT FORM
Part III. TACTICS (continued)

No portion of this document has been completed.

Document No. 12 (AIR 50/192/14)
Date of Report: 29th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 28th of April 1942 – Operations – Attack Against Targets at Cologne and Mine Laying off Heligoland
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Gordon Phillip Newdick, RNZAF NZ40925
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3538 AA – N

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight Well.III a/c were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 4000lbs, and 4lbs incendiaries was dropped on the target and fires were seen burning at Cologne. The mine laying a/c successfully carried out their task, without interference. There was moderate A.A. fire over Cologne and searchlights working in cones. One enemy a/c was seen but no attack was made. Weather was good with visibility up to 100 miles. Navigation was good, DR, TR, loops and map reading.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: Port main plane and port aileron slightly damaged
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 28th of April 1942
On the night of 27/28th April 1942, Wellington Mark III Aircraft (“N” of No. 75 (NZ) Squadron – Captain Pilot Officer R.LEGGETT) was 5 miles North-west of RHEIMS at 0220 hours, 14,000 ft. and was on a bearing of 250 degrees after bombing. One Me.110 approached from below starboard quarter at a distance of 800 feet. The enemy aircraft fired 2 bursts as it crossed the tail of the Wellington aircraft from starboard to port. The Rear Gunner (F/Sgt NEWDICK) fired a short burst and the enemy aircraft then turned and approached from dead astern. The Rear Gunner fired a good burst and the enemy aircraft pulled up sharply and disappeared without opening fire.

2. The I.A.S. was 140 and the enemy aircraft attacked towards the moon in visibility and no cloud.

3. I.F.F. was not on and there was neither flak not searchlights. Also, neither flares not ground lights had been noticed.

4. The Port Main Plane and Port Aileron were slightly damaged.

Document No. 12 (AIR 50/192/15 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 29th of April 1942
Date of Combat: 28th of April 1942 – Operations – Attack Against Targets at Cologne and Mine Laying off Heligoland
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Rufus Leggett, RAFVR 126293/ 103037
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3538 AA – N

Document No. 13 (NOT LISTED IN AIR SERIES)
Appears to be a blank combat form, similar in general layout to the later, non narrative documents that exist at the end of this series.

COMBAT REPORT FORM
Part I. DESCRIPTIVE

No portion of this document has been completed.

Document No. 14 (AIR 50/192/16)
Date of Report: 9th of May 1942
Date of Combat: 6th of May 1942 – Bombing Attacks Against Targets at Stuttgart
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. Frank Henderson Denton, RAF 36238
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3714 AA – W

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight Wellington aircraft of this Unit were detailed to carry out the above attacks. Incendiaries and 4000lbs. bombs were carried and the majority dropped. Weather conditions were not good with the result that difficulty was experienced in pinpointing target and observing results. A.A> fire was slight in target area but fairly heavy at some parts of route. Searchlights were not veru active. No enemy aircraft were encountered. Navigation was by DR, TR, pinpoint, loop.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: At least 3 x Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: no damage from E/A, but wing torn through violence of evasive actions.
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 6th of May 1942
On the night of 6/7th May 1942, a Wellington Mk.III Aircraft (“W” of No.75 (NZ) Squadron – Captain S/Ldr F.H. DENTON) was two to three miles from the Belgian coast at 2236 hrs, 7000 ft, and was on a bearing of 149°. A M.E. 109 approached from below on the port quarter at a distance of 600 yds to 800 yds. Very violent evasive action was taken, whereby both our own aircraft and the enemy aircraft were prevented from firing. Our aircraft was subsequently approached by numerous enemy aircraft during the period from 2236 hrs to 2315 hrs, the height of our aircraft varying from 7000 feet to sea level. Two more M.E. 109’s were identified, but it was not possible to identify the remainder. One enemy aircraft fired one burst from the port quarter above at a range of about 400 yds, but further firing was impossible by either side on account of the violent evasive action taken by our aircraft.

2. The I.A.S. varied from 140 to 210 miles per hour. Visibility was good and the positions of the aircraft with relation to the moon changed constantly.

3. I.F.F. was not on and there was excellent co-operation between searchlights and the fighters. No ground flares nor flak were noticed.

4. Each enemy aircraft had a red light in front and a white light behind. They all appeared to be armed with cannon and machine guns.

5. Our aircraft was not hit by the fighters, but one wing was torn owing to the very violent evasive action taken.

Document No. 15 (NOT LISTED IN AIR SERIES)
Appears to be a blank combat form, similar in general layout to the later, non narrative documents that exist at the end of this series.

COMBAT REPORT FORM
Part III. TACTICS (continued)

Hand written note in section 12. A.A. Fire (b) Evasive tactics employed and effect, but note is illegible and may even be ‘leak through’ from the other side of the page.

Document No. 16 (AIR 50/192/17)
Date of Report: 3rd of June 1942
Date of Combat: 3rd of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Essen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S John Charles Wilmshurst, RNZAF NZ411962
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3720 AA – U

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Sixteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 500lbs, 250lbs and 4lb inc was dropped in the target area but no results were observed. A few small fires were seen near target. A.A. fire was fairly heavy and searchlights operating in cones were numerous. No enemy a/c were seen. Weather marred the operation, there being a heavy ground have. Navigation was excellent. Well, X3408, captained by P/O Carter, failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: claimed as probably destroyed

Combat report for the 3rd of June 1942
Wellington Mk.III. ‘U’ 75 Squadron, Captain FL/Sgt. Wilmshurst, was returning from ESSEN and about 30 miles off SOUTHWOLD flying at 4500 feet, on a course 270°. I.A.S. 160. At 0248 hours the W/Opr standing in the astro-hatch as an aircraft slightly above and 1000 yards on the starboard quarter. At 0255 the E/A closed on our aircraft which was in the moon and at 600 yards opened fire with M/G and cannon. Our Rear Gunner, Sgt. Hurst fired a short burst at almost the same moment and the pilot dived to starboard. The E/A then approached on the port quarter, was identified as a JU 88 and at about 400 yards opened fire passing 400 feet above our aircraft, and our Rear Gunner replied with another short burst. A minute later the E/A switched on its headlamp and attacked with intermittent bursts of M/G fire and our Rear Gunner opening fire at 250 yards with a long burst down to 100 yards when the E/A again identified as a JU 88 started to glow, turned over on its back and fell to the sea. Our Rear Gunner was blinded by his own tracer on each occasion.

Document No. 17 (AIR 50/192/18 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 3rd of June 1942
Date of Combat: 3rd of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Essen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Raymond John Finlay Hurst, RNZAF NZ404067
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3720 AA – U

Document No. 17 (AIR 50/192/19)
Date of Report: 22nd of June 1942
Date of Combat: 20th of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Emden
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Allen Armistice Fraser, RNZAF NZ405030
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3760 AA – L

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eleven a/c were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 500lbs, 4lb inc was taken. Aircraft unable to identify Emden attacked Osnabruck. Results were not observed. Flak was not intense but searchlights were fairly active. One unidentified a/c followed Well.III X3539 for about 5 miles but made no attack. Weather was clear over Osnabruck. Nav was excellent.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me. 109
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 20th of June 1942
On the night of 19/20 June 1942 Wellington III aircraft ‘L’ 75 Squadron (Captain P/O Fraser) was 25 miles N.W. of Osnabruck at 0155 hours, height 10,500 ft before bombing and on a heading of 130deg

2. a ME 109 aircraft approached from 500 yards on the port quarter, closed to 200 yards and fired burst – tracer passing above and below our aircraft which was taking violent evasive action to port. Enemy aircraft lost, but shortly afterwards came in from starboard quarter and fired a short burst as our aircraft turned to starboard and dived to 5,000 ft. Enemy aircraft not seen again.

3. the I.A.S. was 140; there was no moon but it was light. I.F.F. was not on, and flak, Searchlights or flares, etc., had been noticed.

4. Our aircraft was not hit. The Rear Gunner, P/O Trengrove, had no opportunity for firing owing to the violent evasive action taken.

Document No. 17 (AIR 50/192/20 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 22nd of June 1942
Date of Combat: 20th of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Emden
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Raymond Wickliffe John Trengrove, RNZAF NZ40927
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3760 AA – L

Document No. 18 & 19 (AIR 50/192/21)
Date of Report: 20th of June 1942
Date of Combat: 20th of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Emden
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Trevor Harry Smith, RNZAF NZ41953
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3540 AA – H in DB – CR says O

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve a/c were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 250lbs and 4lb inc was dropped in the target area. Results were not observed. There was intense flak and searchlights were few. A JU88 attacked Well.III, X3539 without result. Weather was hazy with 5/10 cloud. Visibility very bad. Nav was good. Well.III, X3760 P/O Fraser failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: Rear tail ammunition box hit and rounds detonated, skin holed mutliple times in fuselage, wing and engine nacelle
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 20th of June 1942
On the night 19/20th June 1942, aircraft ‘O’ pf 75 Squadron, Wellington Mk.III. Captain P/O Smith on heading 275 degrees after bombing, I.A.S. 150.
Alkmaar 30 miles west, 0325 hrs, 7000 ft. W/Op in astrodome saw a flash and explosion outside the aircraft. Rear Gunner at the same time saw red and green tracer, but was unable to say exactly where it came from.
The captain immediately dived to port and the Rear Gunner saw a T/E aircraft pass under the tail from port to starboard. He fired a 3 second burst without seeing effect at about 150 yards. An ammunition box had been blown apart by cannon shell and some of the rounds were exploding so the W/OPR got the fire extinguisher, which, however failed to put out the incendiary bullets. He therefore collected them on the other escape hatch and pushed the whole thing out. The cannon had damaged the inter com from the rear Gunner (P/O Gavegan) but he was able to hear what was going on and states that at no time was there a sign of panic.
An examination of the aircraft showed two further cannon hits on the under side of the port under carriage which did not affect the working of it, and a few probable bullet holes in fuselage and starboard nacelle. Most of the fabric was stripped from the ammunition box to the tail plane on the port side.
It appears that the attack was from slightly underneath the port beam.
The enemy aircraft was not seen again after the first attack.
No.I.F.F. Visibility good, no moon but not dark.

Hand written notes on second page of report, one assumes relates to number convention on one of the report sheets:

8    2044
9   11,000
10    5 x 500      1 x 250
12    None Observed.

20. Flare Path at Aerodromes extinguished on approach of A/C & a single red light appeared & remained on
22. no cloud 3 1 to 11/s miles

Document No. 18 & 19 (AIR 50/192/22 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 20th of June 1942
Date of Combat: 20th of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Emden
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Jack Ralph Gavegan, RNZAF NZ402128
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3540 AA – H in DB – CR says O

Document No. 20 (AIR 50/192/23)
Date of Report: 23rd of June 1942
Date of Combat: 21st of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Emden
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. John ‘Jack’ Leonard Wright, RNZAF NZ405781
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3646 AA – M

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: Geodetics on port side of fuselage. Port Main plane. Rear Spar.
Claim made: Possible damage

Combat report for the 21st of June 1942
At 0300 hrs on the night of 20/21 June, 1942 Wellington Mk.III, ‘M’, 75 Squadron (Captain) Sht. Wright was returning from Emden at 7,000ft after bombing. The aircraft was 20-30 miles N. of Terschelling at 0300 hours and flying on a heading of 270° with I.A.S. 150.

2. Cloud was approximately 2,000 ft below when a JU 88(without lights) came quickly out of cloud and dead astern and slightly below our aircraft. Fortunately the Rear Gunner (Sgt. Neal) saw the enemy aircraft and our aircraft started a dive to port and then skidded to starboard. The enemy aircraft came in from 200 yards to 100yards and gave a 2 second burst which hit the aircraft and a further burst which passed over our aircraft.

As the enemy aircraft opened fire, our Rear Gunner fired 4 quick bursts at point blank range as the enemy climbed to port. Enemy aircraft not seen again.

3. The visibility was good and although the no moon, it was light. No flares or lights, etc. had been noticed.

4. Damage to our Aircraft.
Geodetics on port side of fuselage.
Poert Main plane
Rear Spar.
Astro-Hatch shot through.

Document No. 20 (AIR 50/192/24 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 23rd of June 1942
Date of Combat: 21st of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Emden
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Bruce Neal, RNZAF NZ411771
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3646 AA – M

Document No. 21 (AIR 50/192/25)
Date of Report: 27th of June 1942
Date of Combat: 26th of June 1942 – Attack on Targets at Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Robert Bertram, RAFVR 1112264/ 128536
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III Z.1616 AA – D

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twenty a/c were detailed to attack the above. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 1000lbs, 500lbs and 4lb inc was dropped in the target. Results not observed. There was a large amount of A.A. fire searchlights were ineffective. A JU88 followed Well.III X3664 but did not attack. Weather was moderate with 10/10 cloud. Nav was good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Probably damaged

Combat report for the 26th of June 1942
Oldenburg, 20 miles South West, 0105 hours, 14,000 feet. Wellington Mark III. ‘D’ of 75 Squadron (Captain – Sgt. Bertram, Rear Gunner – Sgt. Archer) was on a course of 074 degrees on the way to the target with the moon on the starboard quarter, 10/10ths light cloud at about 4,000 feet, and a moderate after glow to the North.
The Rear Gunner reported that he saw an aircraft far below the starboard quarter. This aircraft climbed rapidly and was identified as a ME.109. It came up level with our aircraft and almost dead astern at 200 yards when the Rear Gunner opened fire and told the Captain to turn to starboard. The first burst appeared to go straight at enemy aircraft which continued straight on while our aircraft did a turn of 180deg. This enabled the Rear Gunner to give it three more bursts while it was crossing astern two of which were believed to have hit the enemy aircraft which banked momentarily then went into a very steep dive and was lost to sight when almost at cloud level still diving. The dive was seen by the Wireless Operator. Enemy aircraft did not fire and at no time took evasive action. It is thought to have been damaged.
No I.F.F. No Flak. No searchlights. I.A.S. at start of attack was 130

Document No. 21 (AIR 50/192/26 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 27th of June 1942
Date of Combat: 26th of June 1942 – Attack on Targets at Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. George Walter Matthew Archer, RAFVR 1355706
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III Z.1616 AA – D

Document No. 22 (AIR 50/192/27)
Date of Report: 1st of July 1942
Date of Combat: 29th of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Neville John Netscher Hockaday, RAFVR 1376051
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.Ic BJ.837 AA – F

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Sixteen a/c were detailed to carry out the above attack. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 500lbs, and 4lb inc was dropped in the target area. Results not observed. A.A. fire was heavy in target area. Searchlights were ineffective through cloud. A JU88 was attacked and claimed as shot down by Well.BJ837, captained by Sgt. Hockaday. Weather was cloudy. Nav was excellent. Well.III (P/O Monk) failed to return and Well.III Z1616 (Sgt. Bertram) crashed after take-off and caught fire. All crew killed.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: no damage
Claim made: Claimed as probably destroyed

Combat report for the 29th of June 1942
At 01.28 hours when on the way to BREMEN a Wellington Mark III, ‘F’ of 75 Squadron, (Capt. Sgt. HOCKADAY) at 11,000 feet on course 090deg I.A.S. 140 saw JU 88 at 2,000 yards slightly below on starboard quarter.
Our aircraft immediately took evasive action weaving and losing height to 9,000 feet in an endeavour to get the enemy aircraft above and in the moon.
The enemy aircraft closed to 200 yards when our Rear Gunner (Sgt. PHILIP) fired a 3 second burst. His microphone which had been causing trouble packed up, and further investigation found that this was due to faulty wiring in the rear turret. The Wireless Operator (Sgt. HUGHES) from the astrodome kept a running commentary from that point reporting that the enemy aircraft had fired a 5 second burst over the port wing at about 170 yards range. Our aircraft weaved to starboard and at this point the Rear Gunner’s reflector sight went out and when he next sighted the enemy aircraft it was at 100 yards. The enemy aircraft opening fire with cannon and machine gun, which passed over our aircraft and the Rear Gunner simultaneously firing a 10 second burst and then a short one which was seen to strike the enemy aircraft. Our aircraft made a right climbing turn to port and the enemy aircraft overshot above and at this point the Wireless Operator was a burst of flame and smoke coming from the port engine. The port wing of the enemy aircraft dropped and the aircraft fell away and our aircraft at the same time took a steep diving turn to starboard and the Rear Gunner confirmed the smoke was coming from the port engine.
No damage sustained by our aircraft but the enemy aircraft was last seen falling steeply away and is claimed as possibly destroyed. Altogether 1,000 rounds were fired.
This is another instance where the Rear Gunner found extreme difficulty in judging angle of his turret to the fore and aft position of the aircraft, making it difficult for him to report the position of the enemy aircraft even had his microphone been serviceable

Document No. 22 (AIR 50/192/28 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 1st of July 1942
Date of Combat: 29th of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Bruce Rahu Philip, RNZAF NZ405517
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.Ic BJ.837 AA – F

Document No. 22 (AIR 50/192/29 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 1st of July 1942
Date of Combat: 29th of June 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. M.H. Hughes, RAFVR
Position: Wireless Operator
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.Ic BJ.837 AA – F

Document No. 23 (AIR 50/192/30)
Date of Report: 5th of June 1942
Date of Combat: 3rd of July 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Ivor John McLachlan, NZ404390
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.584 AA – C

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve aircraft left base to carry out an attack on targets at Bremen. Bomb load of 4000lbs, 30lb and 4lb incendiaries was dropped in the target area, bomb bursts and fires were seen in target area. A.A. fire was poor and searchlights were scattered but numerous. No enemy a/c were seen. Weather was very clear over target. Navigation was very good by TR and DR.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: No damage
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 3rd of July 1942
On the night July 2/3 1942 Wellington III C/75 Captain F/Sgt McLachlan was returning after bombing Bremen. The aircraft was on a heading of 300deg N. of Ymulden at 0240 hours and at 5,000′. I.A.S. was 150.

2, A Ju.88 was seen flying on reciprocal 500 – 1,000′ below. The enemy aircraft fired one short inaccurate burst and was not seen again.

3. Moonlight. No clouds. No flak, searchlights or flares, etc. seen I.F.F. was not on. Our aircraft was not hit.

Document No. 24 & 25 (AIR 50/192/31)
Date of Report: 21st of July 1942
Date of Combat: 20th July 1942 – Daylight Sorties Against Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Charles Croall, RNZAF NZ41627
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3452 AA – J

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Six a/c were detailed to carry out the above attack. Bomb load was not dropped as all returned to base owing to lack of cloud cover. There was no A.A. fire but four enemy a/c made unsuccessful attacks on Well.III, X3452, captained by Sgt. Croall.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 5 x Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: had bullet hole in fuselage geodetics
Claim made: probable damage

Combat report for the 20th July 1942
The following four combats all took place on July 20th during the course of a daylight operation by A/ 75. Captain Sgt. C Croall. The aircraft was going to Bremen but cloud broke when 10 miles South West of Emden so aircraft turned back and brought bombs back. The first two attacks were on way out, the last two on the journey home. I.F.F. was not on at all during combats.

2. When just N. of Ameland at 1920 hours aircraft was flying at 4,000 ft on a heading of 120deg. Two ME 110’s were seen, one on starboard quarter at 600 yards, and one on port bow at about the same distance. Both enemy aircraft were slightly above and had apparently climbed out of cloud. One enemy aircraft turned in on port beam. On instructions from front gunner, Sgt. Bright, Captain turned to port and front gunner fired three sharp bursts at 400 yards. Enemy aircraft turned away at 300 yards without firing. The W/ Operator, F/sgt Gratton reported other ME 110 on starboard quarter, above at 600 yards. Rear gunner, Sgt. Crarer, had turned turret to port to attack the first enemy aircraft then broke away. the second enemy aircraft came into 500 yards on starboard quarter. The rear gunner fired two 3-second bursts and this enemy aircraft also turned away. During the two attacks, the Captain, after turning in to port skidded away to starboard in a dive towards cloud. Both enemy aircraft had broken off attack before our aircraft reached cloud.

3. Two or three minutes later, when still heading 120deg at 3,500 ft our aircraft came to break in cloud and ME110 fired at 3-400 yards from port quarter above. Rear gunner immediately replied with a 4-seconds burst at same range. Captain dived to port and enemy aircraft was seen to break off attack as our aircraft entered cloud. During this incident our aircraft was hit by one bullet.

4. A further ME110 was encountered just N.E. of Leuwarden at 1950 hours. Our aircraft was heading 290deg and at 4,000′ The enemy aircraft was seen by W/Operator on port quarter and above at 800 yards. As enemy aircraft approached to 4-500 yards Rear gunner fired two short bursts. Our aircraft was weaving just above the broken cloud. When rear gunner fired enemy air craft turned away on port side.

5. When approximately 50 miles N.W of Terschelling at 2020 hours our aircraft was heading 290deg and flying at 200 feet W/Operator reported Me 110 at 800 yards approaching from port quarter at sea level. Enemy aircraft flew parallel course on port side and our aircraft went down to sea level. Rear gunner fired three short bursts at 300 yards which forced enemy aircraft up. As enemy aircraft climbed W’ Operator opened fire with beam gun, but owing to a stoppage only got in a very short burst. Enemy aircraft did climbing turn and came in from port bow at 400 yards. As enemy aircraft came in Captain turned port. Front gunner fired continuously from 300 yards to point blank range as enemy aircraft passed over our aircraft 50 feet above from port bow to astern. Rear gunner fired a final burst of 4 seconds at close range. As enemy aircraft was lost astern, smoke was seen coming from the port engine. This enemy aircraft appeared to be a night fighter as it was painted black.

6. During these attacks no cannon fire was met. The I.A.S. was 150 except during the combat in paragraph 5 when it was 190. The weather was 9/10ths to 10/10ths cloud tops about 4,000 feet. Clear above with good visibility. Cloud base was 1000 to 1,500 feet.

7. Our aircraft had bullet hole in fuselage geodetics from attack under paragraph 3.

R/GUNNER fired 25 rounds. F/GUNNER fired 700 rounds.

Document No. 24 & 25 (AIR 50/192/32 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 21st of July 1942
Date of Combat: 20th July 1942 – Daylight Sorties Against Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. William Henry Bright, RNZAF NZ41567
Position: Front Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3452 AA – J

Document No. 24 & 25 (AIR 50/192/33 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 21st of July 1942
Date of Combat: 20th July 1942 – Daylight Sorties Against Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S James Richard Gratton, RNZAF NZ402996
Position: Wireless Operator
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3452 AA – J

Document No. 24 & 25 (AIR 50/192/34 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 21st of July 1942
Date of Combat: 20th July 1942 – Daylight Sorties Against Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Thomas Eric Crarer, RNZAF NZ405475
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3452 AA – J

Document No. 26 (AIR 50/192/35)
Date of Report: 12th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 11th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Mainz
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O Stanley Holmes Gunning, RNZAF NZ402470
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.725 AA – H

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nine aircraft were detailed to attack above target. Bomb load of 4000lb, 1000lb, 500lb and incendiaries were dropped in target area. A.A. fire was light, searchlights were scarce and ineffective. One fighter was seen by P/O Horne in Wellington B.J.765 as he was crossing the Dutch Coast homeward bound, no attack was made. The weather was moderate, being cloudy near target. Navigation was good by D.R. and T.R. Wellington BJ837 captain Sgt. Hockaday.N.J., five minutes from the English coast on way to target, fabric stripped off nose of aircraft to port and starboard, the Bomb load was jettisoned and the aircraft returned to base. Three aircraft failed to return, Wellington B.J.767 captained by F/O Dobbin, Wellington B.J.625, Sgt Barclay.T.S., captain, Wellington X.3646 captain Sgt Bradey.G.E.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 11th of August 1942
On the night 11/12th August, 1942 a Wellington III H/75 Squadron, Captain F/O Gunning, was on its way to bomb Mainz and about 5 miles East of Gravelines at 2349 hours flying at 7,500 feet on a heading of 106 deg. And I.A.S. 148 when the Rear Gunner. Sgt. Allen, reported a Ju.88.

The enemy aircraft approached from starboard quarter and at some level then turned in to attack at 500 yards from dead astern. Our aircraft turned sharply to starboard and at the same time the rear gunner fired a 4-second burst. The enemy aircraft replied with a short burst, broke off to port and dived into cloud and was not seen again. Our aircraft was not hit. No flak, no searchlights, and no I.F.F.

Document No. 26 (AIR 50/192/36 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 12th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 11th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Mainz
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Harold Vincent Allan, RNZAF NZ402101
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.725 AA – H

Document No. 27 (AIR 50/192/37)
Date of Report: 25th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 25th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Frankfurt
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Harold Ernest Anzac Price, RNZAF NZ405505
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3396 AA – S

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attack Bomb load of 500lb. And incendiaries were dropped in the target area, one large fire was observed. A.A. fire was heavy and accurate. Searchlights were moderate. Several enemy aircraft were seen, Wellington X.3396 Captained by Sgt. Kearns, R.S.D. was attacked by a FW.190. The weather was clear on route but cloudy over target. Navigation was excellent.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: FW.190
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: probable damage

Combat report for the 25th of August 1942
15 miles N of Mons. 0120hrs. 9,000 feet
Weliington Mk.III having dropped its bombs on a town in Frankfurt area was returning on a course of 288deg magnetic at an I.A.S. of 150 m.p.h. At 0120 hrs. the Wellington was 15 miles N. of Mons flying at 9,000 feet. The moon was on port beam and rear gunner (Sgt.Price) saw a F.W.190 coming in very fast. Enemy aircraft was about 450 yards astern. slightly to port and 100 feet below. Rear gunner instructed pilot to turn to port and he immediately did a steep diving turn. At same time rear gunner opened fire at about 250 yards with 3 short bursts and then held trigger. Enemy aircraft however had already opened fire at 300 yards with 2 cannons in its wings. The shots from the Wellington appeared to hit enemy aircraft and it broke off to starboard. During our dive to port the front gunner (Sgt. Holler) was able to get a short burst into the tail of the enemy aircraft which was not seen again. Approximately 900 rounds in all were fired during the engagement. There was no damage to our aircraft and no casualties. There were no S/L’s no flak and I.F.F. was not on.

Document No. 27 (AIR 50/192/38 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 25th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 25th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Frankfurt
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Andrew John Moller, RNZAF NZ411770
Position: Front Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3396 AA – S

Document No. 28 (AIR 50/192/39)
Date of Report: 28 August 1942
Date of Combat: 27th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Kassel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Andrew John Moller, RNZAF NZ411770
Position: Front Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3796 AA –

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attack. Bomb load of 4000 lb. 500 lb. and incendiaries were dropped in the target area. Numerous fires were seen in the whole area. A.A. fire was moderate, very few searchlights were encountered. Wellington BJ.584 captained by Sgt. Burril met JU88 when about 30 miles from target, combat ensued in which Sgt. Burrill’s aircraft was seriously damaged amd port engine put out of action. The rear gunner, Sgt. Gorman claims to have shot down the JU88 and to have seen it falling in flames to the ground, the bomb load was jettisoned, and he turned for home. The aircraft failed to maintain height and was down to 700ft at the Dutch Coast, being shot at by light A.A. fire. He crossed the sea still losing height and belly landed at R.A.F. Wattisham on return. The weather was fine, navigation was excellent. Wellington BJ.708 captained by F/Lt Osbourn failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: One bullet hole in starboard tailplane
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 27th of August 1942
8 miles S.W. of MUNSTER 2219 hrs. 10,000 feet
Wellington MK.III was on its way to attack Kassel at an I.A.S. of 150 m.p.h. on a course of 289deg magnetic. At 2219 hrs flying at 10,000 feet. Wellington was 8 miles S.W. of Munster and tracer came out of the dark from starboard ahead and about 500 yards range. Our aircraft was silhouetted in moon. Wellington front gunner (Sgt. Moller) fired at source of tracer and twin-engine aircraft was seen to cross our track about 350 yards ahead. Wellington dived to starboard and enemy aircraft was not seen again. One bullet hole was found in leading edge of starboard tail plane of Wellington. There were no casualties, no S/L’s, no flak and I.F.F. was not on.

Document No. 29 (AIR 50/192/40)
Date of Report: 28th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 27th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Kassel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filled against: Sgt. Ralph Ernest Gorman, RCAF R.93025
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.584 AA – C

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attack. Bomb load of 4000 lb. 500 lb. and incendiaries were dropped in the target area. Numerous fires were seen in the whole area. A.A. fire was moderate, very few searchlights were encountered. Wellington BJ.584 captained by Sgt. Burril met JU88 when about 30 miles from target, combat ensued in which Sgt. Burrill’s aircraft was seriously damaged and port engine put out of action. The rear gunner, Sgt. Gorman claims to have shot down the JU88 and to have seen it falling in flames to the ground, the bomb load was jettisoned, and he turned for home. The aircraft failed to maintain height and was down to 700ft at the Dutch Coast, being shot at by light A.A. fire. He crossed the sea still losing height and belly landed at R.A.F. Wattisham on return. The weather was fine, navigation was excellent. Wellington BJ.708 captained by F/Lt Osbourn failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: Port nacelle and tail hit. Port motor caught fire. Astrodome splintered and radio generator rendered u/s. Damage also to flaps and undercarriage. Navigator also injured
Claim made: Probably destroyed

Combat report for the 27th of August 1942
50 miles N.W. of Kassel 23.56 hrs. 4,000 feet
Wellington Mk.III was proceeding to Kassel at an I.A.S. of 150 m.p.h. on a course of 126deg M. at 4,000 feet. At 23.56 hrs. the Rear Gunner (Sgt. Gorman) saw a JU 88 which appeared to have been stalking our aircraft. Our aircraft was silhouetted in moon but visibility was not good on account of haze. Enemy aircraft was about 600 yards distant below and astern, flying the same course as our aircraft. Rear Gunner reported enemy aircraft to captain and gave instructions to make a diving turn to port. Enemy aircraft opened fire with tail, setting port motor on fire. enemy aircraft then climbed to attack and opened fire with cannon in its nose. Splinters entered astrodome, the radio receiver generator was also hit and rendered u/s. Damage was done to the undercarriage and flaps. Our R/G opened fire at 500 yards whilst enemy aircraft was climbing and gave it two bursts of about 3 secs. He claimed hits on starboard motor and fuselage. The Ju 88 climbed to within 100 yards at same level on port side and then fell away to port. Our rear gunner gave it another burst of about 5 secs and enemy aircraft was seen to be on fire in engine and fuselage. Our aircraft straightened out at 1,700 ft and did not see enemy aircraft hit the ground on account of their own troubles. About 800 rounds in all were fired by our gunner. The bombs (9 x 500) were jettisoned live immediately after combat in order to remain air-borne. The Wellington continued to lose height and eventually crossed the enemy coast at 700 feet. The navigator (Sgt. Rey), who was the only casualty, brought the aircraft back to England in spite of a painful wound in his groin.
There were no S/L’s or flak and special I.F.F. was on.

Document No. 30 (AIR 50/192/41 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 28th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 27th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Kassel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Frank Burrill, RCAF R.97521
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.584 AA – C

Document No. 30 (AIR 50/192/42 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 28th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 27th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Kassel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Edward Albert Rey, RCAF R.93319/ J.96501
Position: Observer
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.584 AA – C

Document No. 30 (AIR 50/192/43 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 28th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 27th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Kassel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Michael Bertram St. Louis, RCAF R.69204
Position: Wireless Operator
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.584 AA – C

Document No. 30 (AIR 50/192/44 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 28th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 27th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Kassel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. William Wilfred Henry Lavers, RCAF R.83468
Position: Front Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.584 AA – C

Document No. 30 (AIR 50/192/45 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 28th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 27th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Kassel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Ralph Ernest Gorman, RCAF R.93025
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.584 AA – C

Document No. 31 & 32 (AIR 50/192/46)
Date of Report: 29th of August 1942
Date of Combat: 29th of August 1942 – Attack Against Targets at Nuremburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Harold Reginald Hammerton, RNZAF NZ412918
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk. III X.3936 AA – T

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Ten aircraft were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 4000lb. And 1000lb. 500lb. And incendiaries were dropped in the target area. Large fires were seen, A.A. fire was heavy but inaccurate, there were large concentrations of searchlights, enemy aircraft were very accurate. Wellington BJ.837, captained by Sgt. Hockaday reported that the whole town was ablaze and fires were observed 70 miles from the target. Four bomber and one presumed to be fighter were seen falling in flames. The nacelle tanks were pulled in the Amiens region, approximately 60 miles from the coast. Aircraft landed at Tangmere owing to shortage of petrol. On landing one tyre was discovered to be burst. Wellington X.3936 captained by P/O Trott, was attacked by ME.110 fire was returned and the rear gunner, Sgt. Hamerton, reported that the enemy aircraft was hit, no further fire was exchanged. the weather was excellent being clear moonlight over the target, navigation was very good by D/R and T/R. Wellington BJ.673 captained by Sgt. Davis and Wellington X.3389 captained by Sgt. Perks failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: no damage
Claim made: Damaged

Combat report for the 29th of August 1942
Wellington Mk.III flying at I.A.F. 140 m.p.h. on a course of 287deg, was returning from NURNBURG, having dropped its bombs, when at 02.46hrs in position 13 miles W.N.W of AREAS the rear gunner (Sgt. Hamerton) observed an enemy aircraft 2,000 ft down and approximately 400 yards astern apparently stalking our aircraft. The rear gunner reported this to the captain and instructed him to turn. The wireless operator (Sgt. Manawaito), from the astro-dome, identified the aircraft as an Me110. The enemy aircraft had by then commenced a climbing attack and opened fire at approximately 200 yards range. Tracer was observed in front of our aircraft. The captain on receiving the rear gunners report immediately did a diving turn to starboard. The R/G fired a short burst at approximately the same time as the enemy aircraft. The enemy aircraft broke away below to starboard. The captain did a climbing turn to port back onto course. The wireless-operator then reported enemy aircraft as turning for attack and the navigator (P/O Scollay), from the 2nd pilots position, and the R/G both reported enemy aircraft approaching from starboard at about 2,000 ft. below. The navigator instructed the pilot to turn to starboard and our aircraft did a steep turn while at the same time the Front Gunner (X/X Xxxxxxxx) and the R/G each fired a short burst at enemy aircraft XXXxXXX and disappeared below our aircraft. The enemy aircraft a further climbing attack, as tracer was observed in front and slightly to port. Enemy aircraft then broke away on Port side 200-300 feet above. The R/G reported enemy aircrafts position and captain immediately turned to port on to course. The R/G fired a 3 second burst and flames were reported by R/G and W/Op as coming from the enemy aircraft’s starboard engine but these died away.

The enemy aircraft is claimed as damaged but our aircraft was not hit. Approximately 500 rounds were fired by our aircraft throughout the combat. Our R/G reports that perspex of the turret was oiled up due to leak in tail hydraulics. A small clear vision panel is cut in this turret.
There was no flak or S/L’s at the time of the combat and Special I.F.F. was
on.

Document No. 33 (Date of Report: 3rd of September 1942
Date of Combat: 3rd of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Karlsruhe
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Alpheus Leslie Groves, RNZAF NZ403574
Position: Front Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3867 AA – P

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Six aircraft were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 1,000lb. 500lb. 250lb. And incendiaries were dropped in the target area. Large fires were seen on the target, concentrated mainly in centre of target area. A.A. fire was moderate, searchlights were few. Wellington BJ.790 captained by Sergt. Blincoe was attacked by a JU88, the front gunner fired a burst at very short range, the enemy aircraft then broke off the attack, no other enemy aircraft was seen. The weather was clear over the target, navigation was very good by T.R. and D.R. A large fire suspected to be a dummy, was seen 30 to 40 miles West of Target.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Twin engined aircraft
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 3rd of September 1942
10 miles East of SEDAN 0:54 hrs. 9,000 feet.
Wellington Mk,III flying on a course of 287deg at an indicated air speed of 145 m.p.h. and having dropped ut’s bombs saw an unidentified twin engine aircraft approaching out of the moon from the port quarter and slightly above. The enemy aircraft which was about 200 yards away when first seen crossed over the tail of our aircraft and went over to the starboard beam, it then turned in and came towards the nose of our aircraft which turned sharply to starboard into the enemy aircraft.
As our aircraft turned in the front gunner, Sgt. Groves, fired a short burst of about 50 rounds and the enemy aircraft disappeared to port. The front gunner makes no claim and the enemy aircraft did not open fire. There was no flak or searchlights and I.F.F. was not on.

N.B. This crew went missing before the Squadron Gunnery Leader was able to verify or amplify the details of the above report.

Document No. 34 (AIR 50/192/48)
Date of Report: 7th of September 1942
Date of Combat: 7th of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Duisburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Henry Welsh Pullar, RNZAF NZ411777
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.772 AA – D

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Fifteen aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attacks. Bomb load of 4,000lb. 1,00lb. 500lb. 250lb. and incendiaries were dropped in the target area, large fires were seen to be growing in intensity. A.A. fire was heavy and intense but was bursting high above aircraft, searchlights were intense, particularly at target area.
Wellington BJ772 captained by F/Lt. Womersley was attacked from rear on return by an enemy aircraft, one bursts was fired by the rear gunner and the enemy aircraft was driven off. No other enemy aircraft was seen. The weather was good, clear over target with slight ground haze. Navigation was good. Wellington BJ.765 captained by Sergt. Sharman G.W. and Wellington X.3867 captained by F/Sgt. Parkes W.R. failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown twin engined aircraft
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 7th of September 1942
17 miles West of Duisburg. 0258 hrs, 8,000 feet.
Wellington Mk.III flying on a course of 289deg at an indicated air speed of 164 m.p.h. and having dropped its bombs saw an unidentified twin engined aircraft diving at our aircraft from astern and slightly to port. The enemy aircraft was about 300 yards away and 500 feet above when first seen and our rear gunner Sgt. Pullar, immediately instructed the captain to turn to port which he did in a steep diving turn. The enemy aircraft turned to starboard. As the enemy aircraft tried to follow, the rear gunner opened fire at 150 yards with a short burst of 2 seconds. Our aircraft entered a thin layer of cloud and the enemy aircraft was not seen again. There was no flak or searchlights and I.F.F. was not on.

Document No. 35 (AIR 50/192/49)
Date of Report: 7th of September 1942
Date of Combat: 7th of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Duisburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. William James Stanley Voice, RNZAF NZ41708
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.725 AA – H

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unidentified aircraft
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 7th of September 1942
Wellington Mk.III was on way to target carrying 72 x 30lb. Incendiaries and flying on a course of 167deg at an indicated air speed of 155 m.p.h. when the rear gunner (Sgt. Voice) saw spurts of gunfire and what he thought was the blurred outline of an aircraft about 400 yards away and 100 yards above on the starboard quarter. There was no tracer but the source of the gunfire appeared to be turning to to attack the rear gunner told the pilot to turn to starboard which he immediately did, making a diving turn. The presumed enemy aircraft broke away to port above. Shortly afterwards gun flashes (once more with no tracer) were again seen about 400 yards away on the starboard quarter and above. Our aircraft dived to starboard and the enemy aircraft seemed to overshoot and was not seen again. Our aircraft did not open fire and was not hit. There was no flak or S/L’s and I.F.F. was not on but just after the enemy aircraft disappeared for the last time, an orange flare was seen to starboard bursting at about the height of our aircraft

Document No. 36 (AIR 50/192/50)
Date of Report: 9th of September 1942
Date of Combat: 9th of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Frankfurt
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Francis Lawrence Curr, RAAF AUS.404005
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.721 AA – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nine aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attack. Bomb load of 4,000lb., 500lb and incendiaries were dropped in the target area. Larger fires were seen. A.A. fire was moderate, searchlights were numerous, particularly in target area. A few enemy aircraft were seen, but no attacks were made. The weather was good, with slight ground haze. Navigation was accurate by DR and TR. Wellington captained by Sgt. Johnson failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: Possible damage to port wing and fuselage, though difficult to assess owing to considerable previous flak damage.
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 9th of September 1942
Wellington Mk.III was flying on a course of 317deg at an indicated air speed of 140 m.p.h. having dropped its bombs when the captain, Sgt. Curr, saw tracer coming up from underneath and passing in front of our aircraft presumably from an enemy aircraft which had stalked our aircraft which was flying straight and level. Almost immediately afterwards the rear gunner, F/Sgt. Crankshaw, saw an M.E.110 climbing away on the port quarter about 150 yards distant. The enemy aircraft did a stall turn and approached from above on the starboard quarter. The rear gunner told the pilot to dive starboard which he did losing height to 5,500 feet. The enemy aircraft was lost sight of. Our rear gunner could not open fire as his turret had previously been rendered u/s by flak. Our aircraft was thought to have been hit in the port wing and fuselage during the enemy aircraft’s first attack but owing to considerable damage caused by flak the exact damage done by the enemy aircraft could not be ascertained for certain. There was no flak, searchlights or I.F.F. but just after enemy aircraft was finally lost, a flare path with boundary lights was seen below.

Document No. 36 (AIR 50/192/51 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 8 September 1942
Date of Combat: 9th of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Frankfurt
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Kenneth Atherton Crankshaw, RNZAF NZ404533
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.721 AA – A

Document No. 37 (AIR 50/192/52)
Date of Report: 17th of September 1942
Date of Combat: 16th of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Essen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Kenneth Howard Blincoe, RNZAF NZ412194
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.790 AA – ?

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight aircraft were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 4,000lb. And incendiaries were dropped in the target area, large fires were seen. A.A. fire was intense heavy and accurate, searchlights were in heavy concentration. Wellington BJ.790 captained by Sergt. Blincoe K, was hit by A.A. fire in starboard main plain two minutes prior to bombing, which made a big hole between starboard motor and fuselage, making it impossible to turn to port. Near Dutch coast on return, the aircraft was attacked from underneath by an unseen aircraft, being hit several times and the WOP. being wounded in the back. The enemy aircraft was not seen by any of the crew. On return the aircraft belly landed on the aerodrome with hydraulics unserviceable. Wellington BJ.772 captained by F/Sgt. Wright J.L. was attacked by a JU.88 on return from bombing. The enemy aircraft was fired at by the front gunner; after several bursts it was seen by captain WOP and front gunner to explode in the air. A few enemy aircraft were seen by other aircraft but no attacks were made. The target area was covered by 8/10 to 9/10 cloud. Navigation was good by TR and DR.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: As well as significant previous flak damage, rear turret rendered u/s, W/Op injured and fuselage holed multiple times. Aircraft crash landed on return to base
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 16th of September 1942
Wellington III, Capt. Sgt. Blincoe, after bombing and with large flat hole between starboard motors and fuselage which made it impossible to turn to port, on course ???deg. Visibility good, cloud below. No e/a was seen but a burst of tracer fired from under stern to port, this seen by capt. passing starboard wing. This hit the rear turret making it u/s and a tracer entering blinded the rear gunner who then fired a scoring burst of 40 rounds. Our a/c dived to starboard but a second attack developed from underneath to starboard wounding the W/op and holing the a/c in several places. Our a/c again dived to starboard. E/A was not seen by any of the crew. W/Op P/O Lowe, in spite of being wounded in the back(?), insisted on getting fixes on the way home and a/c belly landed on the aerodrome with hydraulics u/s. No. I.F.F.

Document No. 37 (AIR 50/192/53 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 17th of September 1942
Date of Combat: 16th of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Essen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Harold Lowe, RAFVR 905609/ 115129
Position: Wireless Operator
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.790 AA – ?

Document No. 38 (AIR 50/192/54)
Date of Report: 16 September 1942
Date of Combat: 17th of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Essen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S John Leonard Wright, RNZAF NZ405781
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III BJ.772 AA – D ‘Donald’

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight aircraft were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 4,000lb. And incendiaries were dropped in the target area, large fires were seen. A.A. fire was intense heavy and accurate, searchlights were in heavy concentration. Wellington BJ.790 captained by Sergt. Blincoe K, was hit by A.A. fire in starboard main plain two minutes prior to bombing, which made a big hole between starboard motor and fuselage, making it impossible to turn to port. Near Dutch coast on return, the aircraft was attacked from underneath by an unseen aircraft, being hit several times and the WOP. being wounded in the back. The enemy aircraft was not seen by any of the crew. On return the aircraft belly landed on the aerodrome with hydraulics unservicable. Wellington BJ.772 captained by F/Sgt. Wright J.L. was attacked by a JU.88 on return from bombing. The enemy aircraft was fired at by the front gunner; after several bursts it was seen by captain WOP and front gunner to explode in the air. A few enemy aircraft were seen by other aircraft but no attacks were made. The target area was covered by 8/10 to 9/10 cloud. Navigation was good by TR and DR.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as destroyed

Combat report for the 17th of September 1942
Wellington III Capt. F/sgt. Wright, on heading 306deg after bombing. No moon, good visibility. W/Op and R/G reported tracer at about 1,000 yards on starboard quarter slightly below, believed fired at another aircraft. W/Op then reported that a.c was closing on our a/c and fired a short burst not at our a/c; this passing below. Our aircraft pulled up and turned to starboard at that moment on W/Op’s instructions from astrodome. E/A passed along starboard side 100 yards away and 100 feet below and appeared right in front banking starboard to port at less than 100 yards. It was identified as a JU.88 and F/G fired 3 second burst setting the port engine on fire. 1 second later at 150 yards he fired a second burst of 6 seconds and tracer was seen to enter cabin and set starboard motor on fire. As e/a drew away F/G fired a long burst at about 800 yards in the middle of which e/a exploded, apparently in left wing. 400 rounds fired, which Capt., W/Op and F/G. I.F.F. on Claimed as destroyed

Document No. 39 (AIR 50/192/55)
Date of Report: 27th of September 1942
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1942 – Operations. Gardening in Baltic (SILVERTHORNE II)
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Francis Lawrence Curr, RAAF AUS.404005
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3597 AA – C

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Seven aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation. 1500lb. Vegetables and 500lb. Bombs were successfully dropped by two aircraft, who failed to hear a recall signal which was broadcast to all aircraft at approximately 2300hrs. No A.A. fire searchlights or enemy aircraft were seen. The weather was very cloudy with ground haze at base. Navigation was accurate by D.R. and T.R. Wellington BK207 captained by F/Sgt. Dunmall crashed at base on return due to bad visibility.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: Scattered bullet holes in fuselage
Claim made: E/A possibly hit

Combat report for the 27th of September 1942
Wellington Mk.III (Capt. Sgt. Curr) flying on a course of 245deg magnetic at an indicated air speed of 16- m.p.h. returning from Garden but having dropped bombs, saw a Ju.88 approaching from port quarter below at a range of about 500 yards. The enemy aircraft opened fire with nose M.G. at 400 yards astern and below our aircraft. Our rear gunner replied with three short bursts at a range of 300/400 yards. Our aircraft shallow dived and weaved and enemy aircraft disappeared. The rear gunner claims that his last burst possibly hit E/A/ Our aircraft received scattered bullet holes in the fuselage. Good visibility. Cloud base 2,000 feet. Moon on port. No flak. No I.F.F.

Document No. 40 (AIR 50/192/56)
Date of Report: 28th of September 1942
Date of Combat: 28th of September 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Lingen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. John McCullough, RNZAF NZ40410
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Wellington Mk.III X.3539 dnc AA – T

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Three aircraft were detailed to attack the above target. Bomb load of 500lb. Was carried. All aircraft were forced to return to base owing to lack of cloud cover. A.A. fire was NIL. Two aircraft had short combats with ME109’s but results could not be observed. The weather was very cloudy to enemy coast, but then cloud broke and was clear. Navigation was good by T.R. and D.R.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: no damage
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 28th of September 1942
ALKMAAR 5 miles north, before bombing. 1614 hours. 5,000 feet.
Me.109 seen patrolling the coast in break in clouds. Wellington broke clouds 5 minutes later and Front Gunner saw a ME.109 at 800 yards above, green bow already in position to attack. He warned the captain who turned to starboard just as the enemy aircraft opened fire. Front Gunner fired two bursts at 400 and 300 yards as enemy aircraft and our aircraft closed. Enemy aircraft passed right over our aircraft which immediately entered cloud. No damage. No I.F.F. I.A.S. 145 Heading 090 E.

Document No. 41 & 42 (AIR 50/192/57)
Date of Report: 18th of December 1942
Date of Combat: 17th of December 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Fallersleben
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O John McCullough, RNZAF NZ40410
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I R.9250 A – C

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Five aircraft were detailed to attack the above target with bombs of 1,000lb. This was to be a low level flight all the way climbing to 5,000feet to bomb. Four out of the five aircraft unfortunately failed to return. They were the Squadron Commander, Wing Commander V. Mitchell, D.F.C., captain of Stirling I BF396 who took W/O Bagnall and crew who had only arrived a few days previously. Stirling I, BF400 captained by F/O Jacobson, Stirling 1, BK620 captained by P/O R.E. Williams, and Stirling I, R9247 captained by F/Sgt. Rousseau. The one aircraft to return was captained by P/O McCullough who could not find the target owing to rain and bad visibility, and bombed an alternative. This was an aerodrome, the bombs were seen to explode on the flare path and hangars. A.A. fire was fairly heavy and a few searchlights were seen. The aircraft was twice attacked by fighters but they were driven off on each occasion, on return the aircraft was found to have four holes believed due to combat with one of the fighters. The weather was clear to the target but developed to rain and 7/10th cloud on return. Navigation was good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 2 x Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: no damge
Claim made: 1. Certainly damaged, possibly destroyed
2. No claim made

Combat report for the 17th of December 1942
(1) QUAKENBRUK 19.44 hrs. 2,500 feet.
Stirling Mk.I (75/C) on route to Fallersleban, flying ay height of 2,500 ft., course 131deg M. I.A.S. 165 m.p.h., sighted an enemy aircraft, definitely identified as 109 at approx. 100 yards on green quarter below. Visibility from ground level up was very poor, there being a light ground haze. E/A attacked from green quarter below opening fire at 75 yards and closing to 25 yards firing continually, breaking away to port quarter below. E/A on breaking away exposed his belly for approximately 3 secs during which time the rear gunner (P/O. Stuart-White) got in a good burst of 200 rounds. On originally sighting the E/A the rear gunner instructed the pilot to corkscrew – this evasive action was carried out during the whole attack. The rear gunner observed his tracer entering the E/A’s centre section. E/A side slipped out of control towards ground and was not seen again. The rear gunner claims the enemy aircraft as certainly damaged if not destroyed.

(2) ALKMAAR 22.35 hrs. 4,00ft.
Stirling Mk I (75/C) returning from Fallersleben, flying at height of 4,000 ft., I.A.S. of 170 m.p.h. on a course of 255deg M. sighted an enemy aircraft, identified as 109, at 150 yards on green quarter below. Visibility fair. E/A made two attacks, flak and S/L’s being encountered during the second attack. E/A attacked from green quarter below opening fire at 100 yards and firing continually with cannon and machine guns until breaking away at 25 yards to red quarter above. The R/G opened fire when the E/A was at a range of 100 yards with one long burst of 150 rounds, the Mid-Upper gunner (Sgt. Kimmberley) was unable to open fire owing to tail gun firing interrupter coming into operation. During this attack evasive action took the form of corkscrewing. The second attack was delivered from red quarter up, the rear gunner instructed the pilot to execute a diving turn to port, enemy aircraft opened fire at 200 yards. The M/U gunner and R/G returned the fire in bursts of approximately 100 rounds. E/A came in to 30 yards and broke away to starboard, during this attack light flak and 3 S/L’s came into operation and E/A was not seen again. Both attacks were short and sharp. E/A may have been damaged but no claim made.

Document No. 41 & 42 (AIR 50/192/58 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 18th of December 1942
Date of Combat: 17th of December 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Fallersleben
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. K.E. Kimmberley, RAFVR 1576231
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I R.9250 A – C

Document No. 41 & 42 (AIR 50/192/59 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 18th of December 1942
Date of Combat: 17th of December 1942 – Operations. Attack Against Targets At Fallersleben
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Derek Arthur Stuart-White, RAFVR 917071/ 105152
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I R.9250 A – C

Document No. 43 (AIR 50/192/60)
Date of Report: 27 December 1942
Date of Combat: 17th of December 1942 – Fallersleben – Additional report
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Derek Arthur Stewart-White, RAFVR 917071/ 105152
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I R.9250 A – C

Combat report for the 17th of December 1942
Herewith the additional information and verification of certain points asked for in connection with the combat reports of P/O McCullough and crew of the night of 17th18th December.

P/O Stewart-White received his gunnery training at No.1 A.G. School, Manby, and was posted from there to Mo.11 O.T.U., Bassingbourne.

Sgt. Kimberley received his gunnery training at No.4 A.G. School, Morpeth, and from there was posted to No.1483 Group Training Flight.

The E/A’s fire during the first attack was very poor and in the opinion of the Captain and other members of the crew no damage was done to our aircraft.

During the second combat, consisting of two attacks, slight damage was done to our aircraft. In all, six bullet holes but no cannon holes were sustained. These hit our aircraft in the following places :- two through the tail plane and four through the fin. These hits in no way affected the aerodynamic control of our aircraft.

Both Mid Upper and Rear Gunner stand firm on their statement regarding the range at which the E/A broke off the engagements. When first interrogated some doubt was expressed as to the accuracy of range. The Navigator who was sitting at his table stated that he heard the E/A’s gunfire quite distinctly and the whole crew are all reliable men I personally think the question of range and break away can be taken as correct.

(signed G.R. Haywood, F/O)

Document No. 43 (AIR 50/192/61 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: 27 December 1942
Date of Combat: 17th of December 1942 – Fallersleben – Additional report
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. K.E. Kimberley, RAFVR 1576231
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I R.9250 A – C

Document No. 44 & 45 (AIR 50/192/62)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 18th of January 1943 – Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Christopher Patrick Middleton, RCAF R.108000
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK624 AA – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Two aircraft were detailed to attack the above target with 1500lb. vegetables. Stirling I BK624 captained by Sergt. Bennett had a very hot reception, too hot in fact, as this was his first trip. He had combat with three fighters in bright moonlight. The crew behaved exceedingly well and by good defensive tactics managed to avoid the fighters, although the aircraft was found to be holed on return. He reached the gardening area and successfully dropped his vegetables. The other aircraft was forced to abandoned the sortie as the inter-com went u/s over the North sea and the aircraft also had engine trouble. He jettisoned his bombs and returned. The weather was very good with clear visibility and bright moon. Navigation was good by D.R., T.R., and visual.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 1 x Me.109, 2 x JU.88
Damage to our aircraft: No damage
Claim made: No claims made.

Combat report for the 18th of January 1943
(1) JUIST 1 Mile N.W. 19.26 hrs. 4,000 feet
Stirling Mk.I was on the run-up to a garden off the Frisian Islands when, at 1 mile N.W. of Juist Island, it was attacked by a twin-engined enemy aircraft, identified as an Me 110. Our aircraft was flying at 4,000 feet on a course of 342 degs at an I.A.S. of 180 m.p.h. Visibility was very good with a slight sea haze, the moon was on the starboard quarter.
The first indication of the presence of an E/A was cannon fire coming from approximately port bow below. This was seen by the Bomb Aimer who was in the B/A position preparing to drop the mines. The R/G (Sgt. Middleton) sighted the E/A as it appeared directly below the rear turret, crossing at an angle of 045deg, and opened fire immediately with a three second burst. The M/U gunner (Sgt. Pirie) opened fire when E/A was clear of our aircraft’s tail at a range of about 250 yds, getting in a two second burst. E/A carried on and appeared to disappear in a dive astern and was not seen again. The R/G ordered a defensive turn on sighting the enemy aircraft – this consisted of a diving turn to port of 060deg, height lost being 700 feet. As soon as the E/A was lost to view our A/C resumed course and proceeded to drop the mines.
Our aircraft suffered no casualties too the crew nor was the aircraft hit. No claimes of hits on the E/A are made by our gunners. There was no searchlight or Flak activity during the combat and I.F.F. was off.

(2.) N.W of JUIST 19.35 hrs. 2,000 feet.
The same aircraft having completed the laying of mines was at the end of its run over the garden when at 19.35 hrs it was attacked by two twin-engined aircraft, identified as Ju 88. Our aircraft was climbing at the time and when the attack commenced was at a height of 2,000 feet on a course of 271° M. at an I.A.S. of 160 m.p.h. The visibility was very good with a slight sea haze and the moon was dead astern.

The first E/A was sighted by the Bomb Aimer from the B/A position, passing underneath the Stirling’s nose from starboard to port. The E/A went to port beam above and turned in to attack from 400 yards. The Captain of our A/C immediately executed a tight turn to port and turned inside the E/A. As the first attack developed the M/U gunner sighted a second Ju 88 at a range of 450 yards on the starboard beam flying at the same height as our A/C.

The first Ju 88 broke away to starboard below. The second Ju 88, keeping station with our aircraft on the starboard, came in to attack from the starboard beam level closing from 450 to 150 yards very rapidly and firing with cannon. Our M’U gunner replied with a long burst and the E/A broke away above port. During this second attack the defensive tactics took the form of corkscrewing ordered by the M/U gunner. During the next fifteen minutes our aircraft corkscrewed continually. On several occasions both enemy aircraft endeavoured to attack again but were unable to press home endeavoured to attack again but were unable to press home their attacks. During the whole of this combat there was a considerable amount of light flak, believed to have fired from a convoy. The gunners are unable to say whether or not the E/A opened fire again after the initial attacks as tracer appeared to come from all directions and from the sea. The R/G managed to get in a parting shot as one of the Ju.88 crossed our tail at right angles, at a range of 300 yards. After this the enemy aircraft were not seen again.

The second Ju.88 sighted by the M/U gunner carried a single red light on top of the fuselage about amidships.

During this second combat the crew again suffered no casualties and the aircraft was not hit. No claims are made by our gunners. There were no searchlights during the combat and the L.F.F. was off.

The M/U gunner trained at No.7 A.G>S. Stormy Downs and 1483 T.T. & G Flight, Marham.

The R/G was trained at No.7 A.G.S. Stormy Downs, No.11 O.T.U. Bassingbourne and No.1651 Conversion Unit, Waterbeach

Document No. 44 & 45 (AIR 50/192/63 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not Recorded
Date of Combat: 18th of January 1943 – Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. J. Pirie, RNZAF NZ413337
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK624 AA – A

Document No. 46 (AIR 50/192/64)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. K.W. Wilmer, RAFVR 923838
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK646 AA – N

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Seven aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb and incendiaries of 30lb and 4lb., two of these aircraft were forced to abandon the mission owing to engine trouble. The remaining five aircraft successfully attacked the target. The whole of the target was well alight, the bombing also appeared to be accurate. The fires were seen by crews fifty to sixty miles away as they were returning. Heavy and light A.A. fire was encountered, varying from moderate to intense. Some searchlights were also co-operating, but none of our aircraft were coned. A few enemy aircraft were seen, two attacks were made against our aircraft but no damage was sustained. The weather was good with fair visibility although there was a good deal of haze. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 2 x unknown aircraft
Damage to our aircraft: None
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 26th of February 1943
65 miles West of Noordwyerhent 2231 hrs. 8,000 feet

Stirling Mk I (‘N’) was returning to base having bombed the target when 65 miles West of Noerdwyerhent at 22.31 hrs an unidentified enemy aircraft was sighted astern and above at 500-600 yards. Our A/C was flying at 8,000 feet on a course of 292 M. I.A.S. of 165 m.p.h. Visibility was good being 5-7 miles. First enemy aircraft was sighted by the R/G (Sgt. Wesh) slightly above on port quarter at a range of 500 yards. Enemy aircraft attacked from 500 yards, at the same time switching on a bright yellow searchlight in its nose, and broke away at 250 yards to port below without opening fire. The R/G opened fire at 350 yards with two short bursts. As the first enemy aircraft attacked a second E/A was sighted by the mid-upper-gunner (Sgt. Wilmer) on the starboard quarter level keeping station with our aircraft. The first E/A came up on the port beam level, the F/G (Sgt. Ellis) opened fire with a two sec. burst and E/A dived away appearing shortly afterwards astern holding off at approx. 800 yards. The second E/A fell back and formatted on the other E/A. Defensive tactics took the form of a diving turn of 045deg to port followed by corkscrewing. After approximately two minutes both E/A were lost to sight and were not seen again. Practically no height was lost through defensive tactics. There were searchlights during the combat and the I.F.F. was off.

The rear gunner was trained at No.7 A.G.S. Stormy Downs and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

The front gunner was trained at 11 O.T.U. Bassingbourne and 1657 Conversion Flight.

Document No. 46 (AIR 50/192/65 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. S. Ellis, RAFVR 1012770
Position: Air Bomber (Front Gunner)
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK646 AA – N

Document No. 46 (AIR 50/192/66 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Cologne
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Brian Desmond Joseph Welch, RNZAF NZ41719
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK646 AA – N

Document No. 47 (AIR 50/192/67)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 1st of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O John Mathers ‘Jack’ Bailey, RNZAF NZ412183
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF443 AA – V “Waikato”

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attacks with bombs of 1,000 lb. 500 lb. and incendiaries of 30 lb. and 4 lb. Two aircraft, however, were forced to return early owing to inter-comm,, and rear turret trouble, their bombs being jettisoned. The remaining six aircraft successfully attacked the target. This is considered to be a first class effort, colossal fires were seen, which were well concentrated and were seen up to 150 miles away as the aircraft were returning. Three aircraft were hit by A.A. fire in the Ruhr area but they returned safely. The defences in the target area were very poor, little A.A. fire and few searchlights being encountered. Some enemy aircraft were seen but no combats took place. There was slight cloud in the target area, although visibility was very good and ground detail could be seen very clearly. Navigation was excellent.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 1st of March 1943
Magdeburg area. 23.02 hrs. 10,500 feet

Stirling Mk I was returning to base after having bombed the target when on the out skirts of Magdeburg at 23.02 hours the mid-upper gunner sighted a twin-engined E/A identified as an Me 110. Out aircraft was flying at 10,500 feet on a course of 291 M., I.A.S. 165 m.p.h. Visibility was poor, there was no moon and it was very clear.

The E/A was first sighted by the mid-upper gunner on the port bow below at a range of 150 yards flying on a reciprocal course – owing to the angle it was impossible for the gunner to open fire. E/A went away astern, turned sharply and commenced a short attack from 200 yards dead astern on the same level as our aircraft, breaking away at 150 yards to port below E/A did not open fire. The R/G (Sgt. Thompson) opened fire at 200 yards with a one second burst. During this attack defensive action took the form of cork-screwing, height lost was nil. E/A was not seen again and no claim is made by our R/G.

There were no searchlights during the combat and the I.F.F. was off.

The mid-upper gunner was trained at No.7 A.G.S. Stormy Down and at No.15 O.T.U. Harwell.

The rear-gunner was trained at No.2 A.G.S. Dalcross and at No.11 O.T.U. Bassingbourne.

Document No. 47 (AIR 50/192/68 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 1st of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. W.F. Thompson, RAFVR 962902
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF443 AA – V “Waikato”

Document No. 48 & 49 (AIR 50/192/69)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 1st/ 2nd of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. John Negus, RAFVR 1330067/ 172039
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF456 AA – J

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A, unknown twin-engined E/A, Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Ju.88 claimed as a probable destroyed.

Combat report for the 1st/ 2nd of March 1943
54deg 35′ N, 11deg 00′ E (off Fahmorn Islands) 21.00 hrs. 11,000 ft.

(1) Stirling Mk I was outward bound for Berlin when at 21.00hrs position 54° 35′ N., 11°00′ E, just off the Fahmorn Island, when an unidentified twin-engines E/A was sighted. Out aircraft was flying at 11,000 feet on a course of 116 M., I.A.S. of 16- m.p.h. Visibility was fair there being considerable haze below at the time.

The Rear Gunner (Sgt. Howatt) sighted the E/A at a range of 500 yards dead astern on the same level as our aircraft. Defensive tactics took the form of corkscrewing. For approximately five minutes the E/A held off at a range of 5-600 yards, using a bright yellow searchlight in the nose. The R/G and Mid-upper gunner (Sgt. Negus) at this stage both opened fire with two short sharp bursts each, the E/A immediately broke away to port.

Approximately three minutes later the E/A again appeared 500 yards astern and level. The R/G and M/U opened fire with two one-second bursts each. E/A disappeared and was not seen again.

Searchlights appeared to be indicating the track of our A/C just prior to the appearance of the E/A. The I.F.F> was off. No claim of hits are made by our gunners.

(2) OSNABRUCK 00.17 hrs 13.500 feet
The same Stirling aircraft was again attacked on the outskirts of Osnabruck on the homeward journey at 00.17 hrs. Our aircraft was flying at 13,500 feet on a course of 294 M. with an I.A.S. of 155 m.p.h. Visibility was fair at the time.

The R/G sighted an unidentified twin-engined E/A carrying a white searchlight in the nose 500 yards on the fine port quarter 800-1.000 feet below. At this time the track of our aircraft was being indicated from the ground by lights springing up on track and searchlights appearing immediately ahead on either sides forming a lane. The captain of our A/C did tight 60deg to 90deg turns but a lane of searchlights would appear ahead on any heading our aircraft made good. The E/A positioned itself on the port quarter above turning in to the attack from 400 yards, our aircraft immediately did a tight turn into the attack and the E/A broke away across the tail. The M/U and R/G both opened fire at 400 yards with two-sec bursts. After breaking away the E/A was not seen again and for the next four minutes a considerable amount of heavy flak was directed at our aircraft. The I.F.F. was off during this section.

(3) N.W. of MUNSTER 00.45 hrs. 10,000 feet.
The same Stirling aircraft was once again attacked N.W. of Munster at 00.45 hrs by a twin-engined E/A identified as a Ju.88. our aircraft was flying at 10,000 feet on a course of 294 M. at an I.A.S. of 180 m.p.h. Visibility at the time was approximately 1,000 yards

The first indication of the possible presence of enemy night fighter were lights appearing on the ground indication the track of our aircraft. Our aircraft was weaving when the Front Gunner (Sgt. Fielding) sighted an enemy aircraft on the port bow slightly above at a range of 600 yards. Both the front and M/U gunners opened fire immediately with bursts of two secs each, the E/A went into a steep dive and disappeared in a layer of cloud 3,000 feet below without opening fire. A few seconds later a red glow was seen under the clouds which gradually diffused and disappeared after two minutes. When the E/A was sighted our aircraft turned into the attack.

Throughout the three encounters the crew suffered no casualties and our aircraft was not hit, the I.F.F. was off. The Ju.88 engaged in the third combat is claimed as a probable.

The Front Gunner was trained at No.11 O.T.U. Bassingbourne and 1651 Conversion Flight.

The Mid-Upper gunner was trained at No.4 A.G.S. Morpeth, 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight and 1651 Conversion flight.

The Rear Gunner was trained at No.2 A.G.S. Dalcross .No.11 O.T.U. Bassingbourne and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 48 & 49 (AIR 50/192/70 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 1st/ 2nd of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Adam Black Seaton Howatt, RAFVR 979354
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF456 AA – J

Document No. 48 & 49 (AIR 50/192/71 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 1st/ 2nd of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filled against: F/Lt. Geoffrey Maurice Rothwell, RAFVR 42726
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF456 AA – J

Document No. 50 (AIR 50/192/72)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 1st of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O John Mathers ‘Jack’ Bailey, RNZAF NZ412183
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF443 AA – V “Waikato”

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 1st of March 1943
Magdeburg Area 23.02 hrs. 10,000 feet
Stirling Mk. I was returning to base after having bombed the target when on the outskirts of Magdeburg at 23.02 hrs the mid-upper gunner sighted a twin engined E/A identified as an Me 110. Our aircraft was flying at 10,500 feet on a course of 291 M. I.A.S. of 165m.p.h. Visibility was poor, there was no moon and it was very dark.
The E/A was first sighted by the mid-upper gunner on the port bow below at a range of 150 yards flying on a reciprocal course – owing to the angle it was impossible for the gunner to open fire. E/A went away astern, turned sharply and commenced a short attack from 200 yards dead astern on the same level as our aircraft, breaking away at 150 yards to port below. E/A did not open fire. The R/G (Sgt. Thompson) opened fire at 200 yards with a one second burst. During this attack defensive action took the form of cork-screwing, height lost was nil. E/A was not seen again and no claim is made by our R/G.
There were no searchlights during the combat and the I.F.F. was off.

The mid-upper gunner (Sgt. Ottaway) was trained at No.7 A.G.S. Stormy Downs and at No.15 O.T.U. Harwell.

The Rear-gunner (Sgt. Thompson) was trained at No.2 A.G.S. Dalcross and at No.11.O.T.U. Bassingbourne.

Document No. 50 (AIR 50/192/73 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 1st of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. W.F. Thompson, RAFVR 962902
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF443 AA – V “Waikato”

Document No. 50 (AIR 50/192/74 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 1st of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. F.J. Ottaway, RAFVR 1284470
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF443 AA – V “Waikato”

Document No. 51 & 52 (AIR 50/192/75)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 3rd of March 1943 – Mining off the Frisian Islands (Nectarines)
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Richard Otway French, RNZAF NZ415756
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF398 AA – F

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Three aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operations, with mines of 1500 lb. Two of the aircraft successfully dropped their mines in the allotted area, the other aircraft failed to return. No A.A. fire or searchlights were encountered. Sergt. French the Captain of Stirling 1 BF398, met a JU88 on the homeward journey, after a short exchange of firing the enemy aircraft disappeared. The weather was very clear and visibility was good. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was Stirling 1 N6123, captained by Sergt. R.C.Going.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 3rd of March 1943
N.W. of Texel 23.07 hrs 6,000 ft.

Stirling Mk I was returning to base after a mining operation when at position 53° 45′ N.,04° 30′ E (N.W. of Texel) at 23.07 hrs a twin-engined enemy aircraft was sighted, identified as a JU 88. Our aircraft was flying at 6,000 feet on a course of 243deg M. with an I.A.S. of 175 m.p.h.
Visibility was good being 6-800 yds with no moon.

Our R/G (Sgt. Moss) sighted a Ju 88 astern level at a range of 350 yds and opened fire with a one sec. burst E/A immediately broke away below appearing shortly afterwards on the port quarter below at a range of 400yds. The E/A attacked from this position. the R/G instructed the Captain to turn to port and opened fire with a one -sec burst at a range of 350 yards. During this attack the E/A was lost to sight and was not seen again. The Captain of our aircraft executed a turn of 050 degrees and lost approximately 200 feet in height. The E/A did not open fire and carried no lights.

There were no searchlights or flak active at the time and the I.F.F> was off. No claim is made by our Rear Gunner.

The rear gunner was trained at No.7 A.G.S. Stormy Downs, No. 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight and No.1651 Conversion Flight.

Document No. 51 & 52 (AIR 50/192/76 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 3rd of March 1943 – Mining off the Frisian Islands
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Rupert George Moss, RAFVR 1256127/ 147773
Position: Wireless Operator
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF398 AA – F

Document No. 53 (AIR 50/192/77)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 9th of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Nurenburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Douglas Charles Lowe, RAFVR 1312163/ 138661
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK646 AA – N

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nine aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attack with bombs of 2,000 lb. 1,000 lb. 500 lb and incendiaries of 30 lb. and 4 lb. One aircraft returned early owing to engine trouble and another failed to return. The remaining seven aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, large fires being seen, one large explosion from the centre of target, was seen one hundred miles away as the aircraft were returning. Both light and heavy A.A. fire was encountered co-operating with searchlights, they however, proved to be ineffective. Stirling 1 BK646 captained by P/O Lowe, was attacked by an enemy aircraft near Saarbrucken on the return journey. The enemy aircraft opened fire with cannon and a stream of tracer came into the cockpit, one exploding near the second pilot’s leg. Corkscrew tactics were adopted, but after seven minutes the enemy aircraft was lost. The only casualties were the second pilot, who was wounded in the leg and the Captain, who had slight face cuts. The aircraft successfully returned to base. There was a slight haze at the target, although visibility fairly good. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was Stirling 1 BF437, captained by Sergeant C.R. Davey.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A & Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: 2^nd Pilot injured by cannon shell burst, instruments and lighting damaged.
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 9th of March 1943
North of Saarbrucken 00.30 hrs 11,000 feet

Stirling Mk I was on homeward journey having bombed its target when at a position 49° 27′ N., 07° 10 ‘ E. approx. 10 miles North of Saarbrucken, a twin engined E/A identified as a Ju.88. Our aircraft was on a course of 285° M. at a height of 11,000 feet with an I.A.S.. Vertical visibility to aircraft level was poor there being a heavy ground mist but above it was a clear star lit night.
The Rear Gunner sighted a Ju 88 passing 300 feet beneath the tail travelling from Starboard to port st right angle to the heading of our aircraft. E/A carried a single white light about amidships. At the time of sighting our aircraft was gently weaving, this was immediately converted into a corkscrew. when E/A was seen. Three seconds after the first E/A had been sighted an attack was delivered by a second E/A from the starboard quarter below firing cannon. This E/A was not seen by any member of the crew, the position of an attack being substantiated by strikes on our aircraft.

After the attack the E/A carrying a white light dropped astern to approximately 800 yards, keeping in contact with our aircraft for five minutes and was finally lost to sight and was not seen again. During the encounter our gunners did not open fire. The pilot in out aircraft is of the opinion that they make have been silhouetted against a large cone of searchlights over Saarbrucken. There was no flak activity and no ground lights indication our track.

Cannon shell burst in the Pilot’s cocktail wounding the second pilot in the leg and starting a small fire on the starboard side of the instrument panel. All lighting in the aircraft failed except cell-lights which came on automatically. The starboard flap and elevators were also damaged.

The Rear Gunner (Sgt. Welch) was trained at No.11 O.T.U. Bassingbourne and No.1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 53 (AIR 50/192/78 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 9th of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Nurenburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Brian Desmond Joseph Welch, RNZAF NZ41719
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK646 AA – N

Document No. 54 & 55 (AIR 50/192/79)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Harold Ernest Moss, RNZAF NZ413274
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK602 AA – R

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Ten aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attacks, with bombs of 1000 lb. and incendiaries of 30 lb. and 4 lb. Two of the aircraft failed to take-off, as they were found to be unserviceable and three returned early. The remaining five aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Very large fires were seen, which were well concentrated and spreading. The glow from these fires was seen 100 miles away on the homeward journey. Intense heavy and light A.A. fire was encountered, with many searchlights co-operation all round the city. One aircraft was slightly damaged by A.A. fire. Some enemy aircraft were seen but no combats took place. The weather was clear, although hazy. Visibility however, was fairly good. Navigation was good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me. 110
Damage to our aircraft: 8 machine gun hits on port main plane and cannon shell through the tail plane and rudder.
Claim made: no claim made.

Combat report for the 30th of March 1943
South of Oldenburg 0245 hrs 9,500 feet
On the night of 29th/30th March, 1943, Stirling aircraft ‘R’ No. BK.602 was returning to base after having bombed the target when , at a position 52° 50′ N. 07° 20′ E. approximately 20 miles South of Oldenburg, it was attacked by a twin – engined E/A, identified as a M.E. 110. Our aircraft was flying at 9,500 ft, 2,000 ft above 10/10 cloud on a course of 278° Magnetic at an I.A.S. 180 m.p.h. Visibility was fair, being 600-800 yds with no moon. The first indication of the presence of an E/A was cannon and machine gun fire coming from dead astern level. This was seen by the Pilot and the gunners.

The rear gunner, Sgt. Moss, sighted the E/A at a range of 500 yds and opened fire with four short bursts. The pilot, on observing the E/A tracer and thinking it was light flak, carried out a diving turn to post. This turn was converted into a corkscrew when the presence and the position of the E/A given by the rear gunner. The E/A ceased fire and moved up to fine port quarter, closing in from 600-400 yds on two occasions in an endeavour to attack. The M.U. gunner, Sgt. Morgan, opened fire at a range of 500 yds with two long bursts. The E/A then dived away beneath our aircraft, the M.U. gunner getting in a final short burst as it disappeared.
During the combat our aircraft lost approximately 1,000 feet in height. We suffered no casualties during the encounters. Slight damage was sustained by our air craft, there being eight strikes by machine gun bullets on the port main plane and cannon shell through the tail plane and rudder. There was no searchlights or flak activity prior to or during combat. The I.F.F. was off.

The Rear Gunner, Sgt. Moss, was trained at No. 7 A.G.S. Stormy Down, No. 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight and 1651 Conversion Flight.

The Mid-Upper Gunner, Sgt. Moran, was trained at No.1 A.G.S., Manby, No. 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight and 1651 Conversion Flight.

Document No. 54 & 55 (AIR 50/192/80 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Richard Otway French, RNZAF NZ415756
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK602 AA – R

Document No. 54 & 55 (AIR 50/192/81 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of March 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. J. Moran, RAFVR 1117083
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK602 AA – R

Document No. 56 & 57* (AIR 50/192/82) * Document 57 is titled ‘Station Operational Report’ what follows is an alpha list (A,B,C, etc.) with hand written notes against the majority of the letters, though mostly unintelligible.
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 4th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Kiel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. George Eric Fowler, RAF 86427
Position: Air Bomber
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF412 AA – Y

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Ten aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets, with incendiaries of 30 lb. and 4 lb. Four of the aircraft however returned early owing to engine trouble and one of the aircraft failed to take-off. The remaining five aircraft successfully bombed the target, although it was impossible to accurately assess results owing to heavy cloud, but nevertheless red glows were seen silhouetted against the clouds. Both light and heavy A.A. Fire was encountered, with searchlights co-operating. Some enemy aircraft were seen, but no combats took place. There was ten tenths cloud in the target area and visibility was not very good. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: possible slight damage, but no claim

Combat report for the 4th of April 1943
On the night 4/5th April 1943 Stirling A/C ‘Y’ BF421 was returning to base after having bombed the target, when at a position xx° 30′ N 07° 30’E. a twin engined E/A was sighted and identified as a Ju.88. Our aircraft was flying at 6.500 ft, 1,500 ft above 8/10 cloud, on a course of 261 M. an I.A.S. of 165 m.p.h. Visibility was fair, being 4-500 yds with no moon.

The M/U gunner (Sgt. Moss) sighted the E/A on the port bow 500ft above, passing to starboard at right angles to the heading of our aircraft. Defensive action took the form of a diving turn to starboard. The E/A moved in from the starboard bow to a position 300 ft above the M/U turret, the M/U gunner and the rear gunner (F/L Heywood)getting in a short burst each during this manoeuvre. The E/A stayed in this position, directly over our aircraft, for approximately 2 mins during which time diving turns were executed by the pilot in an endeavour to allow the gunners to open fire. The E/A next appeared on the port beam, slightly above at a range of 400 yds, all three gunners opened fire, the rear gunner and M/U gunner with two short bursts each, the front gunner (Sgt. Todd) with one medium burst, the E/A turned sharply and was lost to sight.. At this stage our aircraft entered cloud for a short period, on breaking clear the E/A was again sighted on the port bow and without firing we entered cloud again. Our aircraft stayed in cloud for 15 minutes, the E/A being lost to sight and was not seen again. The E/A carried a single yellow light and made no attempt to attack, which lead us to believe it was a decoy and although a sharp look-out was kept during the encounter nothing was seen of an accompanying E/A. The E/A may have suffered slight damage but no claim is made. During the encounter our aircraft lost approximately 1500ft. There was no searchlight or flak activity prior or during the encounter, the I.F.F. was off.

The rear gunner (FLt. Heywood) was trained at 15 O.T.U. Harwell. The M/U gunner (Sgt. Moss) was trained at No.1 A.G.S. Manby and 1657 Con: Unit. The front gunner (Sgt. Todd R D) was trained at 1X XXXX Dumfries.

Document No. 56 & 57* (AIR 50/192/83 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 4th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Kiel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. J. L. Moss, RAFVR 1312565
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF412 AA – Y

Document No. 56 & 57* (AIR 50/192/84 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 4th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Kiel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/Lt. Guy Lionel Roy Heywood, RNZAF NZ40622
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF412 AA – Y

Document No. 56 & 57* (AIR 50/192/85 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 4th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Kiel
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Robert Ernest Tod, RCAF R.91742
Position: Front Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF412 AA – Y

Document No. 58 (AIR 50/192/86)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 11th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Frankfurt
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Ronald Alexander Smith, RNZAF NZ415378
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF465 AA – K

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1000lb and incendiaries of 30lb and 4lb. Three aircraft were forced to return early as they failed to maintain height. Eight of the remaining aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. It was not possible to see the target owing to thick cloud, a large red glow was nevertheless seen. Both light and heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights was encountered, although they were ineffective. Several enemy aircraft were seen and two short combats took place. There was 10/10ths cloud in the target area, but it was clear and dark above our aircraft. Navigations was excellent. Stirling III, BF455 captained by F/Sgt. Rothschild was hit over the target by A.A. Fire and also chased by enemy Fighters. This caused him to run short of Petrol over the English Channel on the way home, and he eventually crash landed in the sea, 3 miles off Shoreham. The wireless procedure had been perfect, and Spitfires escorted it over the French coast, and a Walrus Flying Boat was waiting for it to crash land. Dingy drill was perfect and all the crew got in safely after an immaculate landing – the Stirling floating for 25 minutes. The final scene was enacted in the Channel as the Walrus collided with the Dinghy and dropped all the crew in the sea. No Ill-effects except for Sgt. Grainger, the Flight Engineer, who suffered from shock. Stirling III BF456 captained by Sgt. Webb failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Single engined unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 11th of April 1943
50° 32′ N. 00° 58′ E. 10,000 ft. 0506 hrs
A/C ‘K/75′ was returning to base after having bombed the target, when at a position of 50° 32′ N 00° 58’ E a single engined E/A was sighted. Our A/C was flying at 10,000 ft. on a course of 003 M. at an I.A.S. of 17 m.p.h Visibility was good, being 3-4 miles with 10/10 cloud at 7,000 ft.

Our A/C had just completed an orbit, when the rear gunner (Sgt. Smith R.A.) sighted the E/A on the port quarter level at a range of 1 mile. The E/A stayed on the port quarter closing rapidly to 500 yds. and opening fire with a short burst, breaking away below to starboard. Our A/C executed a diving turn to port when the E/A was at a range of 600 yds., the rear gunner opening fire with a short burst as the E/A broke away at 150 yds. The E/A made a wide sweep out to starboard, turning in to attack slightly above on the starboard bean at a range of 900 yds. At this stage our A/C entered cloud and stayed there for 18 minutes as the rear gunner was having trouble with the servo feed. The E/A was burning two large lights, red and green, on its upper surfaces just aft of the cockpit. The E/A was not seen again. It was believed that the E/A was using cannon, there was no tracer but large green barrel flashes were seen. There was no searchlight or flak activity prior or during the encounter, and the I.F.F. had been on for 16 minutes.
During the combat the crew suffered no casualties and the A/C was not hit.

The rear gunner (Sgt. Smith R.A.) was trained at 11 O.T.U. Westcott and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 59 (AIR 50/192/87)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 15th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Stuttgart
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Ronald Charles Stone, RNZAF NZ413281
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF455 AA – Y

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eleven aircraft were detailed to attack the above target with incendiary bombs of 30 lb and 4 lb. One aircraft returned early as the controls were faulty. None of the remaining aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Large fires were seen, together with a great deal of black smoke. There was a moderate amount of heavy A.A. Fire encountered on the way to the target, but very little in the target area. A few searchlights were seen, but they were ineffective. Some enemy aircraft were seen and short combats took place, but our aircraft were not damaged. It was very clear over the target, as there was a bright moon, and visibility was good in spite of slight ground haze. Navigation was very good. Stirling Mark III BF513 captained by P/O. D.J. McCaskill failed to return.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 15th of April 1943
48° 30′ N., 048° 10′ E 12,000 ft. 0106 hrs.
Stirling Mk.I was returning to base after having bombed the target when at a position 48° 30′ N., 048° 10′ E. an Me 110 was sighted. Our A/C was flying at 12,000 feet on a course of 125 M at an I.A.S. of 165 m.p.h. Visibility was good being approximately 800 yards.

The Rear Gunner (Sgt. Stone) sighted an Me 110 approaching on the port quarter level. When the range closed to 500 yards the R/G fired one short burst. The E/A turned away and next appeared astern at a range of 600 yards. Defensive tactics took the form of a corkscrewing and after two minutes E/A was lost to sight and not seen again. There was no S/L or flak activity prior to or during the encounter. The I.F.F. was off.

The rear Gunner was trained at No.7 A.G.S., 1651 Con. Flight and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Under ‘Capt. of A/C (for signatory confirmation) a hand written note simply saying ‘since gone missing’

Document No. 60 (AIR 50/192/88)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 15th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Stuttgart
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Christopher Patrick Middleton, RNZAF NZ413337
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF465 AA – K

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Single engined unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 15th of April 1943
48° 58′ N, 64° 20′ E. 11,000 ft. 0110 hrs

Stirling Mk III was returning to base after having bombed the target when at position 48deg 58 N., 04deg 20′ E. an unidentified single-engined E/A was sighted. Our aircraft was flying at 11,000 feet on a course of 281deg M at an I.A.S. of 180 m.p.h. Visibility was good being approximately 800 yds.
The rear Gunner (Sgt. Middleton) sighted the E/A 500 yards astern and above and opened fire with two short bursts. The E/A turned away and was lost to sight and not seen again. The E/A carried no lights and did not attempt to attack and in all probability had not sighted our aircraft. There were no searchlights or flak activity prior to or during the encounter and the I.F.F. was off No claim is made.

The Rear Gunner was trained at No.7 A.G.S. and No.1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 61 & 62 (AIR 50/192/89)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Duisburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Brian Arthur Rogers, RAFVR 1384352
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK619 AA – X

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1000 lb. and incendiaries of 30 lb. and 4 lb. One aircraft however failed to take-off as the pilot was sick. And two aircraft returned early. The remaining five aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, which was a mass of flames. Large concentrated fires being seen which were spreading. Very heavy A.A. Fire was experienced in the target area, which was mainly predicted and co-operation with cones of searchlights. Some enemy aircraft were seen and one combat took place. The weather was very good in the target area, but visibility was impaired by haze caused by the large fires. Navigation was very good. Stirling Mk.III BF517, captained by F/O P.J. Buck, was attacked by an unseen fighter when about 30 miles North of the target. The rudder and tail of the aircraft was damaged, and the rear gunner was mortally wounded. The fighter was evaded and by jettisoning all moveable objects height was maintained and the aircraft returned to base where a perfect crash landing was made. Besides the rear gunner who lost his like, minor injuries were also received by two other members of the crew.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: Rear Gunner mortally wounded, W/Op injured hand MU/Gnr suffered splinters to face. Rear Turret put out of action. Rudder cables shot through, incendiaries ignited in bomb bay.
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 27th of April 1943
51° 50′ N., 06° 42′ E. 15000 ft. 0233 hrs
Stirling III on run-up to the target when at a position 51° 50′ N., 06° 42′ E it was attacked by an unidentified E/A. Our A/C was flying at 15000 ft on a course of 197deg M with an I.A.S. of 155 m.p.h. visibility was poor being 200-300 yards with no moon.

Three minutes after our A/C had made an alteration of course of 120deg on to the last short leg into the target area, a burst of cannon fire was delivered from the star-board fine quarter level (position of attack ascertained by strikes on our aircraft). The R/G (Sgt. Rogers) was badly wounded, dying 30 minutes later, and the rear turret was put out of action. The Captain of our aircraft on hearing the cannon strike executed a diving turn to port followed by a climbing turn to star board. Approximately20 secs later a second attack was delivered from starboard quarter the E/A opening fire with cannon and M/Gun. As the rudder cables of our A/C had been shot away during the first attack the pilot could only dive and climb to evade the fire of the E/A. During the second attack the starboard outer engine was hit, the flaps damaged and the M.W. aerial shot away. There were strikes in the bomb bay causing the incendiaries to ignite so the bomb load was jettisoned and our A/C turned a reciprocal course. at the time of the first attack our A/C was silhouetted against fires in the target area. The E/A was not seen by any member of our crew. Height lost by our A/C during the two attacks was approximately 3,000 feet.
There was no S/L or flak activity prior to or during the encounter and the I.F.F. was off.

The wireless operator sustained a bullet wound in his right hand and the M/U gunner had his face pitted with perspex splinters.

Document No. 61 & 62 (AIR 50/192/90 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of April 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Duisburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Peter John Oswald Buck, RNZAF NZ413377
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK619 AA – X

Document No. 63 (AIR 50/192/91)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dortmund
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Alan Joseph Lyall Sedunary, RAAF AUS.416619
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK776 AA – R

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Ten aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets, with bombs of 2000lb 1000lb and incendiaries of 30lb and 4lb. One aircraft, however, failed to take-off owing to engine trouble. The remaining aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, with the exception of two which returned early owing to engine trouble. Large fires and explosions were seen, which appeared to come from the centre of the target area. Some A.A. Fire and searchlights were encountered, but they were ineffective. A few enemy aircraft were seen, but no combats took place. No cloud was prevalent in the target area, and visibility was good, ground detail was obscured by the smoke from the fires. Navigation was excellent.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as probably destroyed

Combat report for the 5th of May 1943
52° 03′ N. 06° 45′ E. 15,000 ft. 0055 hrs.

Stirling III on run into target at 0055 hrs. when at position 52.03 N. 06.45 E., north of the target area, a twin engined enemy aircraft was sighted and identified as a JU.88. Our aircraft was flying at 15,000ft. on a course of 121deg M. at an I.A.S. 170 m.p.h. Visibility was fairly good, being 400-500 yards with a light ground haze.

The enemy aircraft was sighted by the rear gunner (Sgt. Gratton) on the port quarter, slightly below at a range of 450 yds. Our aircraft was gently weaving at the time of sighting, and as the enemy aircraft moved in to astern, the rear gunner gave the order to turn port, at a range of 400 yards opening fire at the same time with a long burst. The enemy aircraft, without opening fire, immediately broke away to port below, pieces being observed by both the M/U and R/G to fall off the enemy aircraft. The enemy aircraft disappeared in a glide, and two minutes later a red glow was seen on the ground.
There was no searchlight or flak activity prior or during the encounter, and the I.F.F. was off. No height was lost by our aircraft during combat. The aircraft is claimed as probably destroyed.

The Rear Gunner was trained at No.4 A.G.S. Stormy Down, 1483(B) Gunnery Flight, and 11 O.T.U. Westcott.

Document No. 63 (AIR 50/192/92 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dortmund
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. John James Gratton, RAFVR 1351568
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK776 AA – R

Document No. 64 -65 (AIR 50/192/93)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Bochum
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. G. Shinn, RAFVR 1445155
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF561 AA – O

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 2000lb, 1000lb, and incendiaries of 30lb and 4lb. Three aircraft, however, were forced to return early owing to engine trouble. The remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, and very large concentrated fires were seen, together with explosions. This is considered to have been a very successful raid. Heavy predicted A.A. Fire co-operation with searchlights was encountered. Several enemy aircraft were seen and some short combats took place. Stirling Mk.I. BK619, captained by Sgt. J.L. Mitchell was attacked by an ME110 and opened fire at 400 yards slightly below our aircraft. The mod-upper gunner fired a medium burst and the enemy aircraft was seen to burst into flames and passed beneath the Stirling. The rear gunner fired a further long burst at 300 yards and the enemy aircraft was seen to turn on its back and dive, hit the ground and explode. The weather was very clear in the target area, but visibility was impaired by slight ground haze. Navigation was good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A/ Ju.88/ unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: 1st combat, claimed as destroyed. No claim made for 2nd and 3rd engagements.

Combat report for the 14th of May 1943
51° 06′ N. 07° 03′ E. 11,000 ft. 0212 hrs.

Stirling III on the run-in to the target at 0212 hrs. when at a position 51.06.N. 07.03.E. a twin engined enemy aircraft was sighted and identified as an Me.110. Our a/c was flying at a height of 11,000 ft. on a course of 010deg M. at an I.A.S. of 160 m.p.h. Visibility was good, being approx. 800 yards with a half moon on the port beam and no ground haze.

The E/A was sighted by the M/U Gunner (Sgt. Newman) at a range of 600 yards on the port quarter, approaching on a parallel course slightly above our a/c, which was gently weaving at the time. The M/U Gunner opened fire with a two second burst, at the same time instructing the Captain to prepare to turn port. The E/A closed to 350 yards, and as our a/c turned port, opened fire with M/G at a range of 300 yards, the M/U and R/G (Sgt. Shinn) opened fire a medium and long burst respectively. The E/A ceased fire at 50 yards, burst into flames, turned on its back and dived towards the ground. The E/A was observed by the gunners and W/Opr in the astro dome to crash and explode. At the time of the attack two searchlights astern were feeling for our a/c, and there was a considerable amount of flak bursting in the near vicinity. The I.F.F. was off. The crew suffered no casualties and our a/c was not hit.

(2) 51° 40′ N. 07° 15′ E. 11,000 ft. 0232 hrs.
At 0232 hrs. the same a/c shortly after having bombed the target, when at a position 51.40.E 07.15.E. just North of the target area was approached by a twin engined E/A, identified as a JU.88. Our a/c was flying at 11,000 ft. on a course of 325deg M. at an I.A.S. of 160 m.p.h. Visibility was fair, being approx. 600 yards, the moon at the time being obscured by cloud
The E/A was sighted by the M/U gunner at a range of 400 yards, on port fine quarter, flying at the same height as our a/c. The M/U gunner instructed the Captain to corkscrew, and opened fire with two short bursts. The E/A, without attempting to press home an attack, dropped away astern and was lost to sight. During the encounter the R/G kept up a search on the starboard, leaving the M/U gunner to deal with the fighter. Wing-tip lights were carried by the E/A, being red-port and white-starboard. At the time of sighting, our aircraft was gently weaving. There was no searchlight or flak activity in the vicinity.

(3) 52° 40’N. 06° 30’E. 12,000 ft. 0300 hrs
At 0300 hrs, the same a/c when at a position 52° 40’N. 06° 30’E was approached by an enemy a/c, which was not identified. Our a/c was flying at 12,000 ft. on a course of 524deg M at an I.A.S. of 160 m.p.h. Visibility was approx 500 yards with the dawn breaking on the starboard.

The E/A, showing a single red light aft of the cockpit, was sighted by the M/U gunner at a range of 400 yards starboard. The M/U gunner gave the order to corkscrew, and opened fire with a short burst at a range of 300 yards. The I.F.F. was off, and there was no searchlight or flak activity prior or during the encounter.

During the three encounters, no height was lost by our a/c, due to defensive tactics. No claim or strikes are made by our gunners during the second and third engagements.

The R/G (Sgt. Shinn) was trained at No.9 A.G.S.LLandrog, 11 O.T.U. Westcott, and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

The M/U gunner was trained at No.2 A.G.S. Dalcross, 1657 Con. Flight and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 64 -65 (AIR 50/192/94 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Bochum
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. V. Newman, RAFVR 642264
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF561 AA – O

Document No. 64 -65 (AIR 50/192/95 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Bochum
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. John Lefevre Mitchell, RAFVR 1387449/ 155859
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF561 AA – O

Document No. 66 (AIR 50/192/96)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Bochum
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Alfred John Thomas, RAFVR 1394123/ 149999
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK614 JN – H

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Fw. 190
Damage to our aircraft: Rear Gunner hit in right arm with cannon and machine gun fire. Damage by M/G and cannon shell to the fin, elevator and starboard main plane
Claim made: Claimed as probably destroyed

Combat report for the 14th of May 1943
52° 15′ N. 05° 45′ E. 9,000ft. 0240 hrs.

A/C H/75 was returning to base after having bombed when at 0240 hrs at a position 52° 15′ N. 05° 45′ E a single engined E/A was sighted and identified as a FW 190. Our A/C was flying at 9000 ft on a course 095deg M. with an I.A.S. of 165 m.p.h. Visibility was good being approximately 800 yds. with a half moon on the port bow. The E/A was sighted by the rear gunner (Sgt. Parker) at a range of 500 yds slightly below, astern. The R/G gave the order to cork-screw and opened fire with a short burst a split second before the E/A opened up with M/G and cannon. The E/A continued to close in and although the R/G had been hit by a cannon shell and M/G bullets in the right arm he opened fire again with a long burst. As our A/C corkscrewed the E/A came into the M/U gunners line of sight and he opened fire with a long burst. At 50 yds the E/A turned on its back and dived straight down in flames, but was not seen to hit the ground. The R/G’s first burst damaged the fighters main plane and one tip appeared to be bent down. There was no flak or searchlight activity prior or during the combat and the I.F.F. was off. Damage by M/G and cannon shell to the fin, elevator and starboard main plane of our aircraft was sustained.

No height was lost by our A/C during the encounter. This fighter is claimed as probably destroyed.

Sgt. Parker was trained at No.7 A.G.S. Stormy Down, 1651 C.F and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight. The M/U gunner was trained at No.2 A.G.S. Dalcross, 1651 C.F. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 66 (AIR 50/192/97 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Bochum
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. A.E. Parker, RAFVR 1313969
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK614 JN – H

Document No. 67 (AIR 50/192/98)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Jack Ernest Nicholson, RAFVR 1800467
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF564 JN – W

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Sixteen aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attack with bombs of 1000lb and incendiaries of 30lb and 4lb. Four aircraft returned early owing to engine trouble, and one failed to return. The remaining eleven aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, and some large explosions were also seen. Both heavy and light A.A. Fire was encountered, co-operating with searchlights, which were ineffective. Some enemy aircraft were seen and two short combats took place, but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. Ten tenths cloud was prevalent in the target area, but visibility was fairly good. Navigation was very good. This missing aircraft was Stirling Mk.I. BK602, captained by Sergeant T.W. Darton.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Fw.190
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 26th of May 1943
51° 55′ N. 0°5 15′ E. 9,000 ft. 0230 hrs

Stirling A/C W/75 BF.564 was returning to Base on night of 25/26th May, 1943 after having bombed the target, when at 0230 hrs., at a position 51° 55′ N. 05° 15′ E, a single engined E/A was sighted and identified as a FW.190. Our A/C was flying at 9,000 ft. on a course of 312 M. at an I.A.S. of 180 m.p.h. Visibility was fair, being approximately 400 yds., with the moon just rising and a thin layer of 5/10 cloud at 5,000 ft. The E/A was sighted by the rear gunner (Sgt. Gratton), 200 ft below dead astern, at a range of 400 yds. The R/G instructed the captain to corkscrew and opened fire with a short burst at 350 yds. range The E/A broke away to port and making a wide sweep again approached from dead astern. The fighter closed in, opening fire at 300 yds with cannon and M/G, breaking away at 250 yds to port below. The R/G opened fire with a short burst at 300 yds and 350 yds, and the M/U gunner with one short burst at 200 yds. The E/A was lost to sight and not seen again. Prior to the encounter our A/C had been gently weaving and during the whole of the combat defensive tactics took the form of continual corkscrewing. There was no flak activity before or during the attack, there was however a glow on the cloud beneath our A/C by a number of searchlights just prior to the sighting. The I.F.F. was off. Our A/C lost approximately 500 ft. during the combat. During the encounter the crew suffered no casualties and the A/C was not hit. No claims are made by our gunners.

The rear gunner, Sgt. Gratton, was trained at No.7 A.G.S., Stormy Down, 11 O.T.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

The mid-upper gunner, Sgt. Nicholson, was trained at No. 4 A.G.S., Dalcross, and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 67 (AIR 50/192/99 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Alan Joseph Lyall Sedunary, RAAF AUS.416619
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF564 JN – W

Document No. 67 (AIR 50/192/100 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. John James Gratton, RAFVR 1351568
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF564 JN – W

Document No. 68 (AIR 50/192/101)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of May 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Wuppertal
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. A.F. Peters, RAFVR 1154968
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF434 AA – X

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twenty aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with bombs of 2000lb, 1000lb, and incendiaries of 30lb and 4lb. One aircraft failed to take-off owing to the rear turret being unserviceable, and two returned early. Four aircraft failed to return. The remaining thirteen aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Very large fires were seen and also some big explosions. Some heavy A.A. Fire was encountered, but it was ineffective. No searchlights were seen. A few enemy aircraft were seen and one short combat took place, but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. The weather was good in the target area, but visibility was impaired by smoke from the fires. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft were Stirlings Mk.III BK776 Captained by P/O. R.F.Bennett, Mk.I EF398, captained by F/O. R.B. Vernazoni, MK.III EH881 captained by Sgt. J.H. Carey and Mk.III Bf561 captained by Sgt. S.R. Thornley.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 30th of May 1943
51° 10′ N. 04° 20′ E. 13,000 ft. 115deg M.
On the night 29/30th May 1943, Stirling A/C Y/75 No. BF434 was outward bound for WUPPERTAL when at 00.42 Hrs at a position 51° 10′ N. 04° 20′ E. a twin engined E/A was sighted and identified as a Ju.88. Our A/C was flying at 13,000 ft at an I.A.S. of 150 m.p.h. Visibility was good, being 4-600 yds. The rear gunner (Sgt. Peters) sighted the E/A at a range of 300 yds on the port quarter below.

Immediately after instructing the captain to turn to port the rear gunner opened fire with three short bursts. The E/A dived away without opening fire and was not seen again. At the time of sighting our aircraft was flying between two cones of searchlights, consequently there was a certain amount of reflection. the I.F.F. was off.

The rear gunner was trained at No.2 A.G.S. Dalcross, 11 O.T.U., and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight

Document No. 69 (AIR 50/192/102)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 12th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Walter Donald Whitehead, RNZAF NZ416565
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH880 AA – D

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Sixteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 2,000lb.,1,000lb. and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. One aircraft failed to return and two returned early owing to engine trouble. The remainder of the aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Many large fires and huge explosions were seen. Moderate and heavy A.A. fire co-operating with search lights were encountered. One aircraft was coned by searchlights, but violent evasive action eventually avoided them with difficulty. Some enemy aircraft were seen and two short combats took place, but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. The weather was clear and the visibility was good except for haze caused by the fires. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was Stiring Mk.III BK817 captained by Squadron Leader R.H. Laud, (“A” Flight Commander).

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: probable damage

Combat report for the 12th of June 1943
On the night of 11/12th. June , 1943, Stirling A/C ‘D’ No. EH880, 75 (N.Z.) Sqdn., when over the target area a twin engine E/A was sighted and identified as a Ju.88. Our A/C was flying at 14,500 ft. on a course of 360° M. at an I.A.S. of 190 m.p.h. Visibility was good being approximately 1,000 yds with a thin layer of strata cloud at 11,000 ft. The 2nd. pilot sighted the E/A on the starboard beam slightly up at a range of 450 yds. Our A/C was weaving at the time of sighting and immediately went into a corkscrew. The E/A moved around to astern and the rear gunner (F/Sgt. Jamieson) opened fire with a three second burst. The fighter without opening fire broke away to starboard below at 200 yds exposing his belly to the fire of the rear gunner. The E/A carried no lights and was not seen again. Just prior to the sighting one searchlight was feeling for our aircraft, the fighter came in between the searchlight and our A/C. There was a medium barrage over the target area and a larger number of searchlights. The I.F.F. was off. The E/A is claimed as damaged.

The rear gunner was trained at 11 O.T.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 69 (AIR 50/192/103 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 12th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Vincent Rex Jamieson, RNZAF NZ416431
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH880 AA – D

Document No. 70 (AIR 50/192/104)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 12th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Gordon William Colyer, RAFVR 1809432
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK768 AA – L

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unidentified E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 12th of June 1943
57° 08′ N. 06° 40′ E. 12,000 ft. 055deg M.
On the night of the 11/12th, June, 1943 Stirling A/C ‘L’ BK.768 when at a position 57deg 08′ N. 06deg 40′ E, 8 miles S.W. of the target an unidentified twin engined aircraft was sighted. Our A/C, carrying a bo,b load, was flying at 12,000 ft. on a course of 055deg M. at an I.A.S. of 165 m.p.h. Visibility was good being 600 – 800 yds with a half moon on the starboard quarter. The E/A, burning a red and green light aft of the cockpit, was sighted by the W/Op. in the astro-dome on the starboard beam, slightly up, at a range of 600 yds. The E/A moved round to the starboard quarter and broke away at 150 yds without opening fire. Our A/C executed a steep diving turn to starboard, the mid-upper gunner (Sgt. Colyer) opening fire with a long burst at 400 yds and the rear gunner (Sgt. Square) also with a long burst at 300 yds. The fighter, which is claimed as damaged, was lost to sight and was not seen again. There was no searchlights or flak activity prior or during the attack. The I.F.F. was off.

The rear gunner was trained at No.2 A.G.S. Dalcross, 11 O.T.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

The mid-upper gunner was trained at No.4 A.G.S. Morpeth, 11 O.T.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 70 (AIR 50/192/105 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 12th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O William Rosser Perrott, RNZAF NZ416155
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK768 AA – L

Document No. 70 (AIR 50/192/106 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 12th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Dusseldorf
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Harry Squire, 1302829
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK768 AA – L

Document No. 71 (AIR 50/192/107)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 22nd of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Krefeld
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Arthur William Burley, RAFVR 1315375/ 147201
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF434 AA – X

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Fifteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above target with incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. bombs in the target area. The operation was very successful, the whole of the town was seething in flames and the smoke from the fires was rising to a height of 8,000ft. On the return the fires could be seen from the Dutch Coast. Heavy, moderate and light A.A. fire. Some enemy aircraft were seen and one short combat took place, but no damage was sustained to our aircraft. The weather was good with clear visibility except in the target area, where there was haze caused by fires. Navigation was excellent.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 22nd of June 1943
51° 40′ N. 05° 50′ E 9,000 feet 0215 hours

On returning from the target at a position 51° 40′ N. 05°50′ E an enemy aircraft (single-engined) was sighted and identified as an Me1-9. Our A/C was flying at 9,000 feet on a course of 309 M. with an I.A.S. of 170 m.p.h. Visibility at the time was approximately 1 mile with a full moon on the port quarter.

The E/A was sighted by the rear gunner (Sgt. Peters) on the port quarter up at a range of 600 yards flying on a parallel course. As our A/C went into a diving turn to starboard the R/G opened fire with a medium burst at a range of 450 yards. The E/A followed our A/C into the diving turn and the R/G again opened fire with a medium burst at a range of 350 yards. As the E/A closed in our aircraft corkscrewed to port – the M/U and R/G opening fire with a medium burst each. The E/A closing rapidly, overshot and the M/U gunner opened fire with a further two bursts at a range of 200 yards.

The fighter disappeared into the mist in a dive and is claimed as damaged. There was no flak or S/L activity prior or during the attack. The I.F.F. was off.

The Rear and Mid-Upper gunner were trained at No.2 A.G.S. Dalcross, No 11 O.T.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 71 (AIR 50/192/108 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 22nd of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Krefeld
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. A.F. Peters, RAFVR 1154968
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF434 AA – X

Document No. 72 (AIR 50/192/109)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Gelsenkirchen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Allan Mason Forbes Alexander, RNZAF NZ41712
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk. BF443 AA – V “Waikato”

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eleven aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets, with incendiary bombs of 30lb. and 4lbs. One aircraft failed to return and the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Owing to 10/10ths cloud it was difficult to estimate the effectiveness of the attack, although the glow of fires below the cloud, could be seen over a large area. Both moderate and heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights was encountered, but were ineffective. Sergt. Burley’s aircraft sighted an unidentified aircraft from astern, the Stirling corkscrewed and the mid-upper-gunner and rear gunners opened fire. The unidentified aircraft was seen to dive to the ground and a fire and flash were seen. The aircraft was claimed to be destroyed. Some enemy aircraft were seen and three short combats took place but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. It was very cloudy in the target area and visibility was poor. Navigation was good. The missing aircraft was Stirling Mk.III BK768 captained by F/O Perrott.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim

Combat report for the 26th of June 1943
51° 19′ N. 07° 20′ E 13,000 feet 01.10 hours

Stirling aircraft at position 51° 19′ N. 07° 20′ E sighted a twin engined E/A identified as a Ju.88. Our a/c was flying at 13,000 feet on a course of 060 M with an I.A.S. of 180 m.p.h. Visibility was approximately 3-600 yards with 6/10 cloud at 9000 ft.

The Captain of our aircraft sighted the JU 88 at a range of 600 yards on the starboard bow slightly below and immediately turned onto the E/A. The E/A went away to port turned and came in from the port bow level. Our A/C again turned into the fighter which broke away on the port bean down. The M/U gunner (Sgt. Lyon) opened fire with a short burst on the break away. The E/A disappeared below and was not seen again. One white light was carried by the E/A in the nose.

There was no S/L or Flak activity prior or during the attack and the E/A did not open fire. The I.F.F. was off No claim is made by our gunner. Height lost during the encounter was nil.

The M/U gunner (Sgt. Lyon) was trained at No.12 O.T.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 72 (AIR 50/192/110 – AS ABOVE)*
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Gelsenkirchen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Armstrong ‘Doc’ Lyon, RCAF R.108340
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk. BF443 AA – V “Waikato”

*whilst physically a different document from AIR50/192/109, the written content is the same.

Document No. 74 (AIR 50/192/111)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Gelsenkirchen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. Richard Broadbent, RNZAF NZ391339
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK778 JN – U

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as destroyed

Combat report for the 26th of June 1943
52.13 N 05.58 E. 14.000 ft. 01.18 hrs

Stirling ‘U’ at position 52.13 N 05.58 E. sighted an unidentified single-engined E/A. Our a/c was flying at 14,000 ft. on a course of 142deg M with an I.A.S. of 165 m.p.h. Visibility on the port was very good, due to the northern lights, on the starboard visibility was approx. 600 yards. There was a layer of 9/10 cloud at 9,000 ft.

Two minutes after a combat had occurred on the starboard, the M/U gunner (Sgt. Kurton) sighted a white light approaching on the starboard beam. At a range of 600 yards this was identified as a single engined E/A, carrying a white light in the nose. The rear gunner (Sgt. Jones) instructed the Captain to corkscrew, and both gunners opened fire with medium bursts. Our a/c corkscrewed to starboard and the E/A became positioned on the port fine quarter. The fighter closed in to 400 yards on the port, and both gunners again opened fire with medium bursts. At 300 yards there was a large bright flash from the E/A which immediately went into a steep dive, and was lost to sight. Shortly afterwards the crew observed a dull red glow through the clouds. The E/a did not open fire, and is claimed as destroyed. There was no searchlights or flak activity prior to or during the encounter. The I.F.F. was off. Height lost by our a/c was approx. 1,500 ft.

Both gunners were trained at No. 4 A.G.S. Morpeth and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight

Document No. 74 (AIR 50/192/112 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Gelsenkirchen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Harold Percy Jones, RAFVR 1392223/ 149903
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK778 JN – U

Document No. 74 (AIR 50/192/113 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of June 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Gelsenkirchen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Stanley Richard Kurton, RAFVR 1477334/ 161621
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK778 JN – U

Document No. 75 (AIR 50/192/114)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Aachen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. William Hamish ‘Mac’ McDonald, RNZAF NZ417219
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirlling Mk.III BK777 AA – U “Alexander’s Ragtime Crew”

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nine aircraft were detailed to attack targets as above, with incendiaries of 30lbs. And 4lbs. All of the aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, large fires were seen which appeared to be scattered. Some light and heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered. The aircraft captained by P/O CC. Logan, was hit by A.A. fire in the starboard outer engine, fin and elevator, and had to make a landing at FORD, which he did successfully. Some enemy aircraft were encountered. The aircraft captained by P/O. A. Rankin was attacked by a JU.88 and the wireless operator was wounded. The rear gunner returned fire and the enemy aircraft broke away, returning astern and firing a short burst. The Stirling rear gunner then fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft gave a flash, spun half round and disappeared into the cloud , followed by an explosion on the ground. This aircraft was claimed as being destroyed. The aircraft captained by P/O. A.A. ALEXANDER sighted an ME210 on the port beam, 100 yards slightly below. As the enemy aircraft passed below, the front gunner fired a short burst, the Stirling corkscrewed and the enemy aircraft appeared a stern, the rear gunner then fired a short burst and the enemy aircraft was seen to dive into the clouds, and is claimed as possibly destroyed. There was 8/10ths. broken cloud at the target, but visibility above that was good. Stirling Mk.III EE886 captained by F/O. C. EDDY on return, crash landed at OAKINGTON, the under carriage collapsed and the aircraft turned over and caught fire. The mid-upper gunner E.C. VICCARS was killed on impact and the remainder of the crew escaped although not without injuries. The captain, navigator, wireless operator and flight engineer were seriously injured, the remainder being slightly injured.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.210
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as probably destroyed

Combat report for the 14th of July 1943
Stirling ‘U’ at position 50° 55’N 06° 05′ E was attacked by a twin engine E/A identified as a Me.210. Our A/C was flying at 13,500 ft on a course of 226deg M with a I.A.S. of 180- m.p.h. Visibility was good being 800-1000yds with a 3/4 moon on the starboard beam and 8/10 cloud at 9000ft.

The E/A was sighted by the rear gunner (Sgt. McDonald) at a range of 150 yds on the port beam below. The order was given to corkscrew and the M/U gunner and R/G opened fire with a short burst each at 100 yds. The E/A disappeared beneath our A/C and next appeared in a climb ahead. The F/G (F/Sgt. Scott) opened fire with a 3 second burst at a range of 50 yds (range confirmed by the Captain) The E/A half rolled and went away in a steep dive, disappearing into cloud at 9000ft and was not seen again. The E/A which carried no lights is claimed as probably destroyed. There was no search light or flak activity in the near vicinity prior or during the attack. The I.F.F. was off. Height lost by our A/C during the encounter was nil.

The R/G was trained at No.11 O.T.U. 1657 Con Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

The M/U gunner was trained at 1657 Con Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight
The F/G was trained at 1657 Con Flight and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 75 (AIR 50/192/115 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Aachen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Allan Mason Forbes Alexander, RNZAF NZ41712
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirlling Mk.III BK777 AA – U “Alexander’s Ragtime Crew”

Document No. 76 (AIR 50/192/116)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Aachen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Andrew Rankin, RAFVR 1345194/ 146332
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BK646 AA – N

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nine aircraft were detailed to attack targets as above, with incendiaries of 30lbs. And 4lbs. All of the aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, large fires were seen which appeared to be scattered. Some light and heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered. The aircraft captained by P/O CC. Logan, was hit by A.A. fire in the starboard outer engine, fin and elevator, and had to make a landing at FORD, which he did successfully. Some enemy aircraft were encountered. The aircraft captained by P/O. A. Rankin was attacked by a JU.88 and the wireless operator was wounded. The rear gunner returned fire and the enemy aircraft broke away, returning astern and firing a short burst. The Stirling rear gunner then fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft gave a flash, spun half round and disappeared into the cloud , followed by an explosion on the ground. This aircraft was claimed as being destroyed. The aircraft captained by P/O. A.A. ALEXANDER sighted an ME210 on the port beam, 100 yards slightly below. As the enemy aircraft passed below, the front gunner fired a short burst, the Stirling corkscrewed and the enemy aircraft appeared astern, the rear gunner then fired a short burst and the enemy aircraft was seen to dive into the clouds, and is claimed as possibly destroyed. There was 8/10ths. broken cloud at the target, but visibility above that was good. Stirling Mk.III EE886 captained by F/O. C. EDDY on return, crash landed at OAKINGTON, the under carriage collapsed and the aircraft turned over and caught fire. The mid-upper gunner E.C. VICCARS was killed on impact and the remainder of the crew escaped although not without injuries. The captain, navigator, wireless operator and flight engineer were seriously injured, the remainder being slightly injured.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: The W/Op was wounded by a cannon shell and our aircraft sustained strikes by 2 cannon shell and 9 M/Gun bullets.
Claim made: Probably destroyed

Combat report for the 14th of July 1943
Stirling ‘N’ at a position 50° 35′ N, 05° 50′ E homeward bound, was attacked by a twin engine E/A identified as a Ju.88. The attack developed shortly after leaving the target area, from the starboard bow below and was not observed as the B/Aimer had not at that time returned to the front turret. Our A/C was flying at 14,000ft. on a course of 223deg M. with an I.A.S. of 170 m.p.h. Visibility was very good being approximately 250 yds. with a 3/4 moon on the port bow and 8/10 cloud at 10,000ft.

The first indication of the presence of an E/A was M/G and cannon fire which raked the starboard side of our A/C. The E/A was then seen on the starboard bow passing below to the port. The R/G (Sgt. Ogden) opened fire with a short burst as the E/A went away astern. The E/A turned and came in astern, below, opening fire with a short burst at a range of 600yds.
The R/G instructed the Captain to corkscrew and opened fire at a range of 500yds with a long burst. There was a flash from the E/A which ceased fire and went spinning into the clouds. Shortly afterwards two members of the crew observed a flash followed by a dull glow through the clouds. The E/A which carried no lights is claimed as destroyed. There was no search light or flak activity prior or during the encounter. The I.F.F. was off.
The W/Op was wounded by a cannon shell and our aircraft sustained strikes by 2 cannon shell and 9 M/Gun bullets.

Both the R/Gunner and the M/Upper gunner were trained at 11 O.T.U. 1657 Con: Flight and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 77 (AIR 50/192/117)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Aachen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Henry Nicol, RAFVR 657425
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF518 AA – E

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nine aircraft were detailed to attack targets as above, with incendiaries of 30lbs. And 4lbs. All of the aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, large fires were seen which appeared to be scattered. Some light and heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered. The aircraft captained by P/O CC. Logan, was hit by A.A. fire in the starboard outer engine, fin and elevator, and had to make a landing at FORD, which he did successfully. Some enemy aircraft were encountered. The aircraft captained by P/O. A. Rankin was attacked by a JU.88 and the wireless operator was wounded. The rear gunner returned fire and the enemy aircraft broke away, returning astern and firing a short burst. The Stirling rear gunner then fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft gave a flash, spun half round and disappeared into the cloud , followed by an explosion on the ground. This aircraft was claimed as being destroyed. The aircraft captained by P/O. A.A. ALEXANDER sighted an ME210 on the port beam, 100 yards slightly below. As the enemy aircraft passed below, the front gunner fired a short burst, the Stirling corkscrewed and the enemy aircraft appeared astern, the rear gunner then fired a short burst and the enemy aircraft was seen to dive into the clouds, and is claimed as possibly destroyed. There was 8/10ths. broken cloud at the target, but visibility above that was good. Stirling Mk.III EE886 captained by F/O. C. EDDY on return, crash landed at OAKINGTON, the under carriage collapsed and the aircraft turned over and caught fire. The mid-upper gunner E.C. VICCARS was killed on impact and the remainder of the crew escaped although not without injuries. The captain, navigator, wireless operator and flight engineer were seriously injured, the remainder being slightly injured.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as possibly damaged

Combat report for the 14th of July 1943
Stirling ‘E’ at a position 51° 15′ N 05° 55′ E on our run up to the target a twin engined E/A was sighted and identified as a Ju.88. Our A/C was flying at 15,000ft on a course of 153 M with an I.A.S. of 165 m.p.h. Visibility was very good being approx. 1300yds with a 3/4 moon on the starboard quarter 10/10 cloud at 11,000 ft.

The R/G (F/Sgt. Cooksey ) shortly after a ‘Boozer’ contact sighted the E/A at a range of 600 yds astern, below. The E/A climbed up to the port quarter above and attacked from this position opening fire with a cannon at 400yds. Our A/C corkscrewed to port, the M/U and R/G opening fire with short bursts. The R/G opened fire again with a short burst as the E/A broke away to port at 200 yds. The E/A went away astern climbing in a semi orbit to the starboard. When approx. a 1000ft above on the starboard fine quarter the fighter dropped an orange flare, after two or three s turns out of range the E/A approached from the starboard quarter and at a range of 400 yrds the R/G opened fire with a three second burst. The E/A broke off the attack and dived away fast as our A/C reached cloud cover. The fighter which carried no lights is claimed as damaged. There was no searchlights or flak activity prior or during the encounter and our A/C had been gently weaving before the sighting.

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1657 Con Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

the M/U gunner was trained at 1657 Con Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 77 (AIR 50/192/118 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 14th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Aachen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Bernard Laurence Cooksley, RNZAF NZ41435
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF518 AA – E

Document No. 78 (AIR 50/192/119)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 25th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Alexander Davidson, RCAF R.181120
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE915 AA – X

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twenty-three aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 2,000lbs., 1,000lbs., and incendiaries of 30lbs., and 4lbs. Of these aircraft, two returned early due to unserviceable W/T and engine trouble respectively, and one aircraft failed to return. The remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. It was a very concentrated and successful attack. Very large spread fires were seen with black smoke rising to height of 1,400ft., some heavy explosions were also seen. A heavy A.A. barrage co-operating with searchlights were encountered and two aircraft were coned in the searchlights but neither were hit. The aircraft captained by F/O. G. TURNER whilst avoiding a searchlight cone, the starboard wing was struck by a JU 88approaching head on. The enemy aircraft turned over and dived to the ground, it was claimed to be destroyed.. The Stirling was badly damaged having more that 4ft. of the starboard mainplane torn off, and the aileron and aileron controls being useless. The captain had extreme difficulty in controlling the aircraft, but kept it on an even keel with the assistance of the Air-bomber, and after the 3 hours return flight to base, made a perfect landing. Two other short combats took place, but no damage was sustained to our aircraft. The weather was very good, with clear visibility, except for haze caused by smoke from the fires. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was Stirling Mk.III EE890 captained by Sergeant H. Nichol.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 25th of July 1943
Stirling ‘X’ at a position 35°30′ N 05° 08′ E flying at 14,000 feet at 190 M.P.H. on a course of 302 (M).

The visibility was good but there was 8/10th cloud at 5,000 feet. The R/G (Sgt. Davidson) first saw the E/A dead astern and below at 300 yards. It was identified as a JU.88 and carried a red light forward and a green light aft. The R/G instructed the pilot to corkscrew and opened fire with a medium burst.

The E/A immediately broke away on the port quarter down and was not seen again, no hits were observed on the E/A.

The R/G was trained at 14 O.T.U. and 1651 Con. Flight and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 79 (AIR 50/192/120)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 25th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Philip Albin Miles Moseley, RAFVR 1389095/ 158020
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF443 AA – V

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unidentified E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 25th of July 1943
Stirling ‘V’ at a position 09° 00′ N. 53° 30′ E flying at 12,000 feet at 165 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 505 M.
The visibility was good and there was no cloud. The R/G (Sgt. North) first saw the E/A dead astern, slightly below , at a range of 200 yards. He opened fire with on 3 second burst, at the same time telling the captain to corkscrew.
The E/A broke away down at a range of 100 yards and was not seen again. No hits observed on E/A who did not open fire.

Evidently when the pilot of the E/A saw the Bombers tracer he lost all interest in any further attacks.

The R/G was trained at 26 O.T.U. 1651 Con. Flight. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 79 (AIR 50/192/121 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 25th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. A. North, RAFVR 1287534
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I BF443 AA – V

Document No. 80 -81 (AIR 50/192/122)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Essen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Hilton Clifford ‘Speed’ Williams, RNZAF NZ416219
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I EH936 JN – W

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twenty aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 2,000lbs., 1,000lbs., and incendiaries of 30lbs., and 4lbs. One aircraft failed to take off, and two returned early, wing to engine trouble and an intercommunication failure respectively, and one aircraft failed to return. Sixteen aircraft successfully dropped their bombs on target area, which was an absolute mass of flames. Many huge explosions were seen in the midst of the fires. Moderate A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered, one aircraft receiving slight damage. An aircraft was held in a searchlight cone for 3 minutes, but avoided it by making diving turns. Some enemy aircraft were seen. The aircraft captained by F/Sgt. H.C. WILLIAMS sighted an unidentified aircraft 400 yds away approaching from astern. The Stirling corkscrewed and the Mid-upper and Rear gunners fired a long burst, the enemy aircraft exploded in the air and dived to the ground. It was claimed to be destroyed. Another aircraft was sighted by them approaching on the port quarter, the Rear gunner fired two short bursts and the enemy aircraft broke away. The weather was hazy to the enemy Coast, but clear over the target. Visibility was good except for haze caused by smoke from the fires, which could be seen west of the DUTCH coast. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was Stirling MK.III EE892 captained by Sgt.. M. ASHDOWN

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 1 x single-engined E/A & 1 x twin engined E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Single engined E/A claimed as destroyed

Combat report for the 26th of July 1943
Stirling ‘W’ at a position 52° 00′ N. 06° 20′ E. flying with an I.A.S. of 160 at 15,500 feet on a course of 150 M. Visibility was good, no cloud, the moon was still down and there were no pronounced Northern lights. There was no searchlight activity or track indicating lights.

The R/G (F/Sgt. Kaye) saw the unidentified single-engined A/C flying at the bombers height on the port beam 2,000 yards away. There was no flak in the immediate vicinity.

The E/A shadowed the bomber for about five minutes closing round the port quarter to dead astern. The E/A had a bright white light on the top of the fuselage.

The R/G told the pilot to corkscrew to port and opened fire with a 3 second bursy on the E/A at 400 yards. The E/A closed into 300 yards and both the Mid Upper Gunner (Sgt. Hemsley) and the R/G opened fire with a 3 second burst. The E/A did not reply with any fire at the bomber and both gunners observed the E/A blew up in mid-air.

It fell to the ground and the gunners and captain saw it burning on the ground. The E/A is claimed as destroyed.

At 0055hrs
The same crew on the home at a position five miles north of Duisburg at a height of 15,000 feet flying on a course of 296 M. with a speed of 200 m.p.h. (I) was attacked twice by an unidentified twin – engined A/C.

The visibility was good the moon was low and there were no pronounced Northern Lights.

The E/A was first seen 500 yards away on fine port quarter at this range, the R/G told the pilot to corkscrew to port and he opened fire with three short bursts, The E/A broke away to starboard without opening fire but came in again from the starboard – the R/G again opened fire at 300 yards with two short bursts and told the pilot to corkscrew to starboard. The E/A broke away on the port quarter down and was not seen again, but no hits were observed on the E/A.

There was no searchlights or Track indication Lights near the bomber during any of the attacks..

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1651 Con Flt. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

The M/U/G. was trained at N.11 O.T.U 1651 Con Flt. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 80 -81 (AIR 50/192/123 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Essen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Ivon George Kaye, RNZAF NZ39558
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I EH936 JN – W

Document No. 82 (AIR 50/192/124)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 28th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Osric Hartnell White, RNZAF NZ415807
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF435 JN – J

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twenty two aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with bombs of 2,000lb., 1,000lb., and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb.. Two aircraft returned early owing to engine trouble, but the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. This attack was more concentrated than the previous one, colossal fires and explosions were seen with smoke rising to 20,000ft. , a ship was also seen to be on fire in a Dock south of the target. Moderate heavy and light A.A. fire co-operating with search lights operating in belts were encountered, although the A.A. fire was heavier than the previous attack, it was ineffective except for slight damage to three aircraft. Some enemy aircraft were seen. The aircraft captained by F/Sgt.E.J.ROBERTS sighted a JU 88 approaching from port beam above and all gunners opened fire, the enemy aircraft broke away firing and then approached on the port beam below. Mid-upper and Rear gunners fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft was claimed to be damaged. The Stirling was also damaged, having a bomb door blown off and a petrol pipe-line pierced, nevertheless the captain brought his aircraft safely back to base. The weather was good except for 3/10th cloud at the target, visibility was good, although smoke haze prevented identification of ground detail. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 28th of July 1943
Returning from bombing Remscheid Hamburg Stirling ‘J’ was intercepted at 53° 35′ N 09° 10′ E by a Ju.88 Our A/C was on a course of 306 (M) I.A.S. 180 and the height was 14000 feet.

The visibility was not good and there was no moon. Prior to the interception, the crew of the Stirling noticed activity that indicated their track.

The Ju.88 was first sighted flying on a parallel course 400 yds, away on the port beam. There was no boozer contact.

The E/A came in from the port beam and the M/U/G (Sgt. Collins) gave order to corkscrew to port and opened fire at 300 yds, with a three second burst.

The E/A did not open fire, but broke away to the port quarter and disappeared down to the starboard quarter. No hits were observed on the E/A. Evidently after seeing the Bomber’s fire the E/A did not press home an attack.

The M/U/G was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1651 Con Flt. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 83 -84 (AIR 50/192/125)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 28th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Eric John Roberts, RNZAF NZ417107
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE897 AA – G

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Possible 3 x Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: The result of this attack rendered the front and mid upper turrets u/s, the starboard bomb doors were shot away, the fuselage and wings were severely holed and a petrol pipe was severed.
Claim made: Claimed possibly damaged

Combat report for the 28th of July 1943
Stirling AA”G” returning from Hamburg at a position 53° 52′ N. 07° 20′ E. approximately 15 miles port of track was subjected to three attacks by Ju.88 aircraft. The Bombers gunners are not sure whether these attacks were made by three different E/A or two.

The visibility was good with no cloud and no moon on a course of 3000deg (M), The I.F.F. was off and there was no searchlight action or flak in the vicinity.

The first attack developed from the port beam, slightly up and the mid upper gunner (P/O Haydon) sighted him at 600 yards. He gave the pilot the order to corkscrew to port and all three gunners opened fire at a range between 400 and 500 yards. The Ju.88 closed in round to the port quarter, opened fire with a very short burst of cannon which did not hit the Stirling and broke away to starboard down. Hits were observed on the E/A.

The second E/A made a short attack from the port beam down. Before he could fire at the corkscrewing bomber, the Stirling M/U/G fired a short burst at the E/A causing the E/A to break off the attack by diving down to the starboard beam.

The E/A’s third attack was made with some deliberation and despite a long burst from the R/G (Sgt. Haub) and M/U gunner at 100yds he came in from the fine starboard quarter slightly down and raked the bomber from stern to stern with cannon and machine gun fire. The result of this attack rendered the front and mid upper turrets u/s, the starboard bomb doors were shot away, the fuselage and wings were severely holed and a petrol pipe was severed.

Hits by the R/G and M/U/G were observed as the E/A broke away down and disappeared underneath the bomber. The Ju.88 is claimed as damaged.

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1651 Con Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

TheM/U/G was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1651 Con Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 83 -84 (AIR 50/192/126 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 28th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Jack Henry Haydon, RAAF AUS.408400
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE897 AA – G

Document No. 83 -84 (AIR 50/192/127 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 28th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Darcy Leslie Conrad Haub, RNZAF NZ42326
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE897 AA – G

Document No. 85 – 86 (AIR 50/192/128)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of July 1943
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O George Morrison Duncan, RAFVR 1348085/ 137232
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I EE898 AA – D

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Seventeen aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with incendiary bombs of 30lb. And 4lb. Two aircraft returned early and the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. This was a very successful attack, large concentrated fires with heavy explosions ans smoke rising to 15,000ft., were seen. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered, which were scattered and unpredictable. One aircraft was held in searchlights cones for periods of 10 and 8 minutes, he avoided them with extreme difficulty and whilst so doing was hit in the fuselage by A.A. fire. Two other aircraft also received slight damage. Some enemy aircraft were seen and the aircraft captained by Sgt. P. Hartstein sighted a JU 88 which came in from astern firing a cannon, the Rear gunner replied and the enemy aircraft broke away. The aircraft captained by F/O. G. DUNCAN sighted a JU 88 on the port quarter , the Mid upper gunner gave a 10 second burst and the enemy aircraft dived away. The aircraft captained by F/S/ E. WILKINSON sighted a JU88 on the port quarter, the enemy aircraft opened fire and the Rear gunner replied, the enemy aircraft then broke away. The aircraft captained by F/S. J. DARNEY encountered an unidentified enemy aircraft which fired from the starboard quarter, the Rear gunner replied and the enemy disappeared. It was clear at the target area and the visibility was good except for haze from the fires. Navigation was excellent. The aircraft captained by P/O. A. SEDUNARY just after bombing, had one of its engines failed. After unsuccessful attempts to start it, he brought the aircraft back to base on three engines and made a perfect landing.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88 ( 2 attacks)
Damage to our aircraft: Holed by fire in the mainplane, tailplane and undercarriage door.
Claim made: Probably damaged.

Combat report for the 29th of July 1943
Stirling “AA D” returning from bombing Hamburg was subjected to two attacks by Ju.88 A/C. Visibility was not very good because of haze. Our A/C was flying at 14,000 feet on a course of 250? (M) with an I.A.S. of 170.

There was a lot of flak and moving searchlights about two miles astern. A Boozer contact was made and the M/U/G (P/O Strong) sighted the E/A and identified it as a Ju.88 at 600 yards on the port beam silhouetted against searchlights. The M/U/G gave the order to corkscrew to port and gave a long burst as the E/A wheeled round in a steep bank to dead astern and broke away down on the starboard quarter. The E/A did not fire.

At 0113, five minutes later whilst the Stirling was still corkscrewing, the R/G (P/O McCorkindale) sighted a Ju.88 on the port quarter 400 yards away. The E/A opened fire and the R/G replied with a long burst. Hits were observed on the E/A 200-300 yards also when the E/A broke away 200 yards away down in the port quarter.

The Fighters armament was cannon and machine gun.

The Stirling was holed by the E/A’s fire in the mainplane, tailplane and undercarriage door.

AT THE TIME OF THIS INTERCEPTION THE STIRLING WAS SEVEN MILES SOUTH OF TRACK

The position of this interception was 53°23′ N. 09°28′ E. Height 14,000 feet, Speed 170 (I). Course 300 (M).

The E/A is claimed a damaged.

The M/U/G was trained at 11 OTU, 1657 Con. Flt. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.
The R/G was trained at 11 OTU, 1657 Con. Flt. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 85 – 86 (AIR 50/192/129 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O John Robert McCorkindale, RNZAF NZ392051
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I EE898 AA – D

Document No. 87 (NOT IN AIR 50/192 SERIES
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Philip Hartstein RAFVR 1390001/ 158031
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF465 AA – K

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Seventeen aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with incendiary bombs of 30lb. And 4lb. Two aircraft returned early and the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. This was a very successful attack, large concentrated fires with heavy explosions and smoke rising to 15,000ft., were seen. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered, which were scattered and unpredictable. One aircraft was held in searchlights cones for periods of 10 and 8 minutes, he avoided them with extreme difficulty and whilst so doing was hit in the fuselage by A.A. fire. Two other aircraft also received slight damage. Some enemy aircraft were seen and the aircraft captained by Sgt. P. Hartstein sighted a JU 88 which came in from astern firing a cannon, the Rear gunner replied and the enemy aircraft broke away. The aircraft captained by F/O. G. DUNCAN sighted a JU 88 on the port quarter , the Mid upper gunner gave a 10 second burst and the enemy aircraft dived away. The aircraft captained by F/S/ E. WILKINSON sighted a JU88 on the port quarter, the enemy aircraft opened fire and the Rear gunner replied, the enemy aircraft then broke away. The aircraft captained by F/S. J. DARNEY encountered an unidentified enemy aircraft which fired from the starboard quarter, the Rear gunner replied and the enemy disappeared. It was clear at the target area and the visibility was good except for haze from the fires. Navigation was excellent. The aircraft captained by P/O. A. SEDUNARY just after bombing, had one of its engines failed. After unsuccessful attempts to start it, he brought the aircraft back to base on three engines and made a perfect landing.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: JU.88
Damage to our aircraft: not recorded
Claim made: not recorded

Combat report for the 30th of July 1943
Stirling ‘K’ on route for Hamburg, flying at 15,000 feet on a course of 111? (M) with a speed of 150 I.A.S. was followed for about 10 miles xxxx xx°xx’ N. xx°xx’ E.

Document then becomes very indistinct – small snippets at legible, but not enough to make sense of the report

Document No. 88 (AIR 50/192/130)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Jack Neville Darney, RNZAF NZ42376
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE915 AA – X

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Seventeen aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with incendiary bombs of 30lb. And 4lb. Two aircraft returned early and the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. This was a very successful attack, large concentrated fires with heavy explosions and smoke rising to 15,000ft., were seen. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered, which were scattered and unpredictable. One aircraft was held in searchlights cones for periods of 10 and 8 minutes, he avoided them with extreme difficulty and whilst so doing was hit in the fuselage by A.A. fire. Two other aircraft also received slight damage. Some enemy aircraft were seen and the aircraft captained by Sgt. P. Hartstein sighted a JU 88 which came in from astern firing a cannon, the Rear gunner replied and the enemy aircraft broke away. The aircraft captained by F/O. G. DUNCAN sighted a JU 88 on the port quarter , the Mid upper gunner gave a 10 second burst and the enemy aircraft dived away. The aircraft captained by F/S/ E. WILKINSON sighted a JU88 on the port quarter, the enemy aircraft opened fire and the Rear gunner replied, the enemy aircraft then broke away. The aircraft captained by F/S. J. DARNEY encountered an unidentified enemy aircraft which fired from the starboard quarter, the Rear gunner replied and the enemy disappeared. It was clear at the target area and the visibility was good except for haze from the fires. Navigation was excellent. The aircraft captained by P/O. A. SEDUNARY just after bombing, had one of its engines failed. After unsuccessful attempts to start it, he brought the aircraft back to base on three engines and made a perfect landing.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: not recorded
Claim made: not recorded

Combat report for the 30th of July 1943
Stirling X at a position 54° 12′ N 09° 05′ E flying at 1,000 feet 165 M.P.H I.A.S. on a course of 290 M. An unidentified E/A fired from the starboard quarter. The R/G (Sgt. Vercoe) replied and the E/A disappeared.

No further details can be given as the crew were missing the following night, before full details could be obtained.

Document No. 88 (AIR 50/192/131 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 30th of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hamburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Terrance James Vercoe, RNZAF NZ415566
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE915 AA – X

Document No. 89 (AIR 50/192/132)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Remscheld
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Osric Hartnell White, RNZAF NZ415807
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF435 JN – J

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Thirteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with incendiary bombs of 30lb. And 4lb..One aircraft returned early as rear turret was unserviceable and two failed to return. The remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, large concentrated fires and some explosions were seen. Moderate heavy and light A.A fire co-operating with searchlight belts were encountered, and one aircraft was slightly damaged in the mid- upper turret. Some enemy aircraft were seen, the aircraft captained by F/S. O. WHITE sighted an unidentified aircraft which attacked three times. Each time the mid upper and rear gunners fired a burst, and strikes were seen on the enemy aircraft which then fell away and claimed to be damaged. The weather was good with clear visibility except for haze caused by fires. Navigation was very good. On return, one aircraft landed at HARDWICK, due to shortage of petrol. The missing aircraft were Stirling Mk.III BF458 captained by Sgt. A.J. THOMAS and Stirling Mk.III EE915 captained by F/Sgt. J. DARNEY.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown twin-engined E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 31st of July 1943
At a position 51° 43′ N 04° 04′ E, Stirling “J” flying at 16,000 feet with I.A.S. of 160 on a course of 116 M saw an unidentified twin-engined A/C flying on a parallel course on the starboard beam, approximately 1000 yards away, with his navigation lights on.

There was no searchlight activity and no flak. The visibility was not good. The I.F.F. was off.

The Pilot of the Stirling turned to starboard and the unidentified A/C crossed the Stirling’s bow in a steep fast turn then flew on a parallel course on the port beam for a few minutes, then disappeared on the port beam.

Three minutes later the unidentified A/C still with navigation lights on was observed about 700 yds away dead astern and slightly below. He came in rapidly and the pilot was told to corkscrew by the R/G but because of the visibility the crew of the Stirling could not definitely identify the A/C.

He closed in to 400 yds and the R/G (Sgt. Poole) opened up with two, two second bursts, hits were observed and the Navigation lights were extinguished and he broke away to the starboard quarter below at about 150-100yds.

No answering fire was received from the unidentified A/C which is claimed as damaged.

The R/G was trained at No.11 OTU, 1651 con Unit and 1483 B Gunnery Flight

Document No. 90 (AIR 50/192/133)
Date of Report: 30 July 1943
Date of Combat: 30/31st of July 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Remscheld
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Hilton Clifford ‘Speed’ Williams, RNZAF NZ416219
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.I EH936 JN – W

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: – Unknown twin engined E/A
Damage to our aircraft: – None
Claim made: – Claimed as destroyed

Combat report for the 30/31st of July 1943
Stirling “B” on route for Remscheld on a course of 093? (M) at 13,500 feet witnessed a combat taking place about 3,000 feet up and 3,000 yards away on the starboard bow.

Our A/C at this time was flying at 165 M.P.H. and the position was 50°20’N, 07°00’E.

The visibility was quite good with no moon and no cloud. There was no searchlight activity and no flak. The I.F.F. was off.

The Front Gunner Sgt.XXXXXXX noticed a white light dead ahead slightly down, xxx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxx xxx xxxxx. The light grew brighter and eventually a twin engined E/A was observed at a range of 800-900 yards.

The Stirling F/G opened fire with three bursts. Flames xxxxx from the unidentified E/A as it xxxxx on to the starboard bow and fell to the ground on fire. The captain and gunner observed the E/A explode on the ground.

The E/A did not return the Bombers fire.

The xxxx xxx xx cloud that xxx xxx F/G fired xxx third burst xx xxxxxx xxx xx xxx lit up xx xxx xxxx Bomber xxxxxxxx

The E/A is claimed as destroyed.

The F/G was trained at No.11 OTU 1657 Con Flt.

Document No. 91 (AIR 50/192/134)
Date of Report: 6 August 1943
Date of Combat: Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filled against: F/S Eric John Roberts, RNZAF NZ417107
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF461 AA – B

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Five aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with mines of 1,500lb. One aircraft returned early owing to inter-communication failure and bought its mines back and one aircraft failed to return. The remaining aircraft successfully dropped their mines in the allotted area and the parachutes were seen to open. Slight heavy A.A. fire and one searchlight were encountered, but were ineffective. A few enemy aircraft were seen, one short combat took place, but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. The weather was good above 1,000ft. and visibility was fair to good. On the return journey, F/Sgt. Mayfield’s aircraft fired at a locomotive and the engine was seen to blow up with a brilliant flash. The missing aircraft was a Stirling Mk.I HK614 captained by F/Sgt. Mayo, J.R.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No hits observed on E/A

Combat report for the 6^th of August 1943
Stirling “B” returning from mining enemy water flying at 1,500 feet with a speed of 180 (T) and on a course of 034? (M) was intercepted by an unidentified E/A at 47°02/N, 03°07’E.

There was no flak or searchlight activity. The visibility was poor with 6/10ths cloud at approximately the bombers height.

The M/U/G (P/O Haydon) first sighted the E/A about 300 yds away, slightly up on the starboard quarter flying with a red light forward.

The M/U/G gave the pilot the order to corkscrew to starboard and immediately the E/A opened fire with cannon and M/G, green and white tracer was observed.

The R/G (Sgt. Haub) and M/U/G opened fire almost immediately with the E/A and after two or three seconds, the E/A broke away at 150 yds, to starboard down and was not seen again.

No height was lost by the Stirling which suffered no damage and no hits were observed on the E/A

The R/G was trained at No.11 OTU 1651 Con. Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flt.
The MU/G was trained at No.11 OTU 1651 Con. Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flt.

Document No. 92 – 93 (Un-Listed in AIR Series)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 13th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Turin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Arthur William Burley, RAFVR 1315375/ 147201
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF434 AA – X

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eighteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb., 50lb. and incendiaries of 30lb and 4lb. All of the aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area, which was an absolute mass of flames, colossal fires and heavy explosions were also seen. Very feeble A.A. fire and a few searchlights were encountered, but were ineffective. Some enemy aircraft were seen and one combat took place. The aircraft captained by P/O A. Burley sighted an unidentified aircraft on the way to the target in the Chartes area, which approached from astern, the rear gunner gave a short burst, the Stirling corkscrewed and the enemy aircraft broke away. The Stirling’s port outer engine was badly damaged and had to be feathered. The captain however, continued to target which was 380 miles distant on three engines, successfully bombed it and returned to base, making a perfect landing. The weather was clear with a bright moon over the target. Navigation was excellent.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown twin-engined aircraft
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 13th of August 1943
Stirling “X” at a position 48deg 16’N 01deg36′ E flying at 165 M.P.H. I.A.S. At 6,000 feet on a course of 142 M. on the way to Turin.

There was no flak or searchlight activity at the time and visibility was good with bright moon directly ahead.

The R/G (Sgt. Peters) sighted a twin-engined E/A on the port quarter up at 800 yds. The R/G instructed the pilot to corkscrew to port but the message was not received by the pilot (due to defective inter-com) and the E/A opened fire getting hits on the port inner engine. The R/G opened fire at the same time and hits were seen on the E/A which broke away on th eport beam up and was not seen again.

The Stirling was damaged in this attack due to evasive action being taken too late. This was due to the press to speak switch not functioning correctly when first pressed. The R/G states that ne could not fire his guns and press the switch fully home at the same time while wearing gloves, for the rest of the trip he had to fly without gloves.

A full report has been sent to Group by the Signals Section on the above switch.

At 0024 hours
The same crew just after leaving the target and while doing a navigational turn at a position 44deg51’N 07deg 39’E., at a height of 14,000 feet at 170 M.P.H. I.A.S.

The R/G sighted a single engine E/A on the port quarter below a range of 800 yards.

The E/A appeared to be following our A/C round and the R/G opened fire with a four second burst, and many hits were observed on the E/A. The E/A without offering fire broke away on the port beam down and was not seen again.

The E/A is claimed as damaged.

The R/G was trained at No.2 A.G.S., No.11 O.T.U. 1651 Con Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flt.

Document No. 94 (AIR 50/192/135)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 17th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Turin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: W/C Michael Wyatt, RAF 37994
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH880 AA – J

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb. and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb.. All of the aircraft successfully bombed the target except one which jettisoned its bombs 10 miles N.W. of Turin owing to an electrical equipment failure. Some huge explosions and very large fires were seen, which appeared to be spreading. Slight A.A. fire and a few searchlights were encountered, which were ineffective except for one aircraft that received negligible damage. Some enemy aircraft were seen and two short combats took place, but no damage was sustained to our aircraft. The weather was good except for ground haze. Navigation was very good. All the aircraft were diverted to other aerodromes on return, owing to fog at base.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as presumed damaged

Combat report for the 17th of August 1943
Stirling “J” at a position south of target flying at 165 m.p.h. I.A.S. at 14,500 feet on a course of 310 M.

There was the usual flak and searchlight activity over the target and visibility was good.

The R/G (Sgt. Grange) sighted a S/E enemy aircraft at 400 yards on the starboard quarter level. The M/U/G (Sgt. Dummett) opened fire with a short burst and the R/G with two short bursts. The E/A without opening fire broke away on the port quarter down and was not seen again.

Hits were seen on the E/A and it is presumed to be damaged.

“Signature as Captain of aircraft” is Keith McGregor – listed as 2nd Dickie for this Op…….

R/G trained at 11 OTU, 1665 Con. Unit. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

M/U/G trained at 9 AGS, 26 OTU, 1651 Con Unit and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight

Document No. 94 (AIR 50/192/136 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 17th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Turin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Terence Grange, RAFVR 1323448
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH880 AA – J

Document No. 95 (AIR 50/192/137)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 24th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S George Stanley Wilkinson, RAFVR 642538
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH901 JN – O

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twenty three aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb., 500lb., and incendiaries of 30lb and 4lb.. Five aircraft returned early owing to failure and three aircraft failed to return. The remainder of the aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area and all of the crews agreed that it had been well and truly hit. The fires were all concentrated and huge columns of smoke together with heavy explosions could be seen. A moderate heavy A.A. barrage co-operating with searchlights were encountered, but only one aircraft received damage. A great number of enemy aircraft were seen and several combats took place. The aircraft captained by F/Sgt. WILKINSON sighted a JU88 passing above, the Mid-upper and Rear Gunners fired and strikes were seen on the enemy aircraft which was then lost sight of and is claimed to have been damaged. The aircraft captained by F/Sgt. WHITEHEAD whilst over BERLIN sighted an enemy aircraft on the starboard quarter, 300yds away. The Rear Gunner fired a five second burst and the enemy aircraft was seen in flames diving to earth, and was claimed as probably destroyed. The same aircraft encountered another unidentified aircraft 300yds away on the starboard quarter. The Rear Gunner fired another five seconds burst and the enemy aircraft exploded and disintegrated. It was claimed to be destroyed. The aircraft captained by F/O. A. Alexander, whilst over the target sighted a ME110 approaching from the starboard quarter above and firing at his aircraft. The Mid-upper and Rear Gunners replied with long bursts and the enemy aircraft was seen to be in flames. A fire was later seen on the ground and the enemy aircraft was claimed as probably destroyed. Scattered cloud was met on the outward route, but it was clear over the target. The missing aircraft were Stirlings Mk.III BF465 captained by P/O A. RANKIN, BF564 captained by P/O A. Sedunary and EE938 captained by W/O T. Fear.

The aircraft captained by F/Sgt. WHITE, O.H. whilst approaching the target area was coned by searchlights and repeatedly hit by heavy A.A. fire, sustaining considerable damage to port main-plane. He continued towards the target though still coned by searchlights and was then attacked by a JU88 sustaining hits in the rear of the fuselage which shattered the rear turret and killed Rear Gunner Sgt. Poole, J.. The aircraft was forced into an uncontrollable dive and the captain warned his crew ‘Prepare to abandon the aircraft’. Unfortunately, in the middle of this order the inter-communication failed, and the Navigator, Air Bomber and Wireless Operator abandoned the aircraft, due to the fact that they were unable to contact their Captain. F/Sgt. WHITE jettisoned his bomb-load whilst in the dive directly over the target area, managed to regain control of the aircraft when height had been lost down to 6,000ft. The captain and two remaining members of the crew after taking stock of the damage decided to attempt the long and hazardous return journey to base. This they did successfully and made a perfect crash landing at base without lights, flaps or under carriage, as the electrical leads were shot away.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 24th of August 1943
Stirling “O” while over the target flying at 180 m.p.h. IAS at 14000 feet on a course of 000 M during the bombing run.

There was the usual flak and searchlight activity over the target. Visibility was good and the moon was rising on the starboard bow.

The Engineer in the Astrodome sighted a T/E E/A on the starboard quarter up at a range of 500 yards. The E/A was dropping flares. The M/U/G (Sgt. Robson) and the R/G (Sgt. Wilkinson) identified the E/A as a JU.88

The M/U/G opened fire with a short burst and the R/G with two short bursts at a range of 500 yards.

The E/A turned on its side and dived down on the starboard beam. The Captain of the Stirling saw tracer hit the E/A and it is claimed as damaged.

M/U/G was trained at 2 A.G.S. 1651 Con. Unit 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight

R/G trained at 2 A.G.S. 11 OTU Con Unit, Oakington

Document No. 95 (AIR 50/192/138 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 24th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. E.S. Robson, 1810690
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH901 JN – O

Document No. 96 (AIR 50/192/139)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Arthur William Burley, RAFVR 1315375/ 147201
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH877 JN – C

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 23rd of August 1943
Stirling “C” returning early, flying at 4,000 feet, position 52° 39’N 00°31’E. Speed 160 I on a course of 192° (M) was attacked by an unidentified A/C.

The Stirling had Navigation Lights on and the IFF was also on.

The visibility was poor and our bomber had just broken dense cloud.

The unidentified a/c was first noticed on the port quarter below about 600 yards away and it shadowed the bomber for about 10 seconds and then fired three short bursts at about 400 yards. The pilot extinguished the navigation lights and turned into the attack.

The R/G (Sgt. Peters) observed two lots of tracer, white and orange, but did set? fire at the unidentified E/A which broke away to port down and disappeared. No hits were registered on the Stirling.

The R/G was trained at 11 OTU 1651 Con Flt. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 96 (AIR 50/192/140 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. A.F. Peters, RAFVR 1154968
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH877 JN – C

Document No. 97 – 98 (AIR 50/192/141)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 24th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Walter Donald Whitehead, RNZAF NZ416565
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF465 AA – H

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109 and unknown single engined E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: First E/A confirmed as destroyed. Second E/A claimed as destroyed.

Combat report for the 24th of August 1943
The R/G (F/Sgt. Jamieson) of our Stirling “H” at 1600 feet over the target, position 52°35’N 13°30’E on a heading of 0XX°(M) with an IAS of 175 noticed another Stirling coned and being attacked by an ME.109 There was no cloud but visibility was poor with a haze

The E/A broke off the attack on the other Stirling and was then positioned 300 yards away on the starboard quarter slightly down in relation to our Stirling. The M/U told the pilot to corkscrew to starboard and fired a three second burst and both he and other members of the crew observed the ME.109 go down in flames. At the time there was plenty of searchlight activity on the port and starboard, both cones and single searchlights which appeared to be working with the E/A. There was not much flak at the time and our A/C lost no height. The IFF was off. The E/A did not fire at the Stirling.

Thirteen and a half minutes later the same Stirling now at position 53deg15’N 13deg20’E and flying at 1,500 feet on a course of 3XXdegM with an IAS of 165 M.P.H. was intercepted by an unidentified S/E E/A flying on the starboard beam 400 yards away. As the E/A closed round to dead astern XXX the starboard quarter the R/G gave the pilot directions to corkscrew to starboard and when the E/A was almost dead astern but slightly below, the R/G opened fire with a three second burst and observed the A/C blow up xxxxxxxxx mid air.

There was not much searchlight activity in the immediate vicinity and no flak. The E/A is claimed as destroyed.

No height was lost by the bomber in this encounter. The ME.109 concerned in the first encounter has been confirmed as destroyed by an A/C of 15 Squadron.

Flight Sergeant Jamieson is to be congratulated on his marksmanship, but most of all these two encounters prove once again that an alert gunner working in perfect harmony with the pilot has the advantage over the fighter pilot. Flight Sergeant Jamieson and the pilot F/Sgt. Whitehead made every use of this advantage.

The R/G was trained at 11 OTU 1651 Con Flight and 1483(B) Gunnery Flt.

Document No. 99 (AIR 50/192/142)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 24th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Clifford Charles Pownall Logan, RAAF AUS.405918
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK778 JN – U

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as destroyed

Combat report for the 24th of August 1943
Stirling “U” while over the target flying at 160 m.p.h. IAS at 12,000 feet on a course of X10 M. just as the bombs were dropped and on the run taking the photo.

There was the usual flak and searchlight activity over the target, but no searchlights were actually on our A/C. Visibility was good with the moon rising on the starboard beam.

The R/G (Sgt. Knox) sighted a Me.110 on the starboard quarter up at a range of 300 yards and instructed the pilot to corkscrew starboard. The E/A closed to 200 yards and opened fire with cannon and machine gun. The M/U/G (Sgt. Crowther) and the R/G opened fire with two short bursts each. The E/A ceased fire and crossed astern around to the port fine quarter. The R/G opened fire again with a long burst and followed the E/A round.

Many hits were seen and the E/A fell out of the sky on fire and a red glow was seen on the ground just outside of the target area.

The Stirling was not damaged in this attack and the E/A is claimed as destroyed.

R/G trained at 11 OTU 1657 Con Unit 1483 Gunnery Flight.

M/U/G trained at 1 AGS, 16 O.T.U. 1657 Con. Unit and 1483 Gunnery Flt.

Document No. 99 (AIR 50/192/143 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 24th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Frederick Edward William Crowther, RAFVR 1339159
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK778 JN – U

Document No. 99 (AIR 50/192/144 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 24th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Albert John Knox, RNZAF NZ416006
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK778 JN – U

Document No. 100 (AIR 50/192/145)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 28th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Nurenbburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Gerald Scott Phillips, RNZAF NZ416536
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH948 AA – Q

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nineteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with incendiary bombs of 30lbs. and 4lbs. One aircraft failed to return, but the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Good concentrated fires and heavy explosions were seen. A moderate barrage consisting of light and heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered, and two aircraft received slight damage. Some enemy aircraft were seen, one short combat took place, but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. The weather was cloudy on the outward journey but clear over the target and visibility was good. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was Stirling Mk.III EE955 captained by F/Sgt. Higham.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 28th of August 1943
Stirling “Q” at a position 43° 40’N 10°30’E flying at 170 m.p.h. I.A.S. at 15,000 feet on a course of XXX M.

There was no flak or searchlight activity in the near vicinity and visibility was fair being about 600 yards. The I.F.F. was off.

The M/U/G (Sgt. Cassidy) sighted a JU.88 on the starboard quarter up at 500 yards and instructed the pilot to corkscrew to starboard. The E/A came round to dead astern and the R/G (Sgt. Banks) opened fire with a two second burst at 400 yards.

The E/A broke away immediately on the port fine quarter down and was not seen again.

M/U/G was trained at 4 A.G.S. 11 OTU, 1651 Con Unit , 1483 Gunnery Flt.
R/G was trained at 4 A.G.S. 11 OTU, 1651 Con Unit , 1483 Gunnery Flt.

Document No. 100 (AIR 50/192/146 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 28th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Nurenbburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. T. Cassidy, RAFVR 1557950
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH948 AA – Q

Document No. 100 (AIR 50/192/147 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 28th of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Nurenbburg
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. L.W. Banks, RAFVR 1315127
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH948 AA – Q

Document No. 101 (AIR 50/192/148)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Munchen-Gladbach
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. Richard Broadbent, RNZAF NZ391339
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH939 JN – J “Johnnie”

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
18 Aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with incendiary bombs of 30lbs. and 4lbs. All aircraft with the exception of one which failed to return, successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Very large fires which were well concentrated and spreading, were seen. All crews were of the opinion that this was a good attack. Moderate heavy A.A. fire and a few searchlights were encountered, which were ineffective. A great number of enemy aircraft were seen and some short combats took place. The aircraft captained by F/Sgt. Batger, H. sighted an enemy aircraft 600 yards away, ahead and the front gunner fired a long and short burst, the enemy aircraft then disappeared and was claimed as possibly destroyed. . The aircraft captained by F/S McGregor,K. sighted an Me110 astern, the rear gunner fired a long burst. The enemy aircraft replied and dived away with smoke pouring from its engines. It is claimed as a possible destroyed. There was 8/10ths cloud at the target approaches although it was clear in the target area. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was Stirling MK.III EH938 captained by Sgt. Parkin, T.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claime made

Combat report for the 31st of August 1943
Stirling “J” was flying at 13,000 ft at 160 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 296 (M) when the crew noticed white tracer passing under the port tail-plane – no a/c was sighted

The visibility was poor, there being 8/10 cloud at about 6,000 ft.

The flak was moderate between our Stirling and the target.

The pilot corkscrewed for two minutes, but still no contact was made with any other a/c.

Document No. 102 (AIR 50/192/149)
Date of Report: 30 August 1943
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Munchen-Gladbach
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Warwick Harold Batger, RNZAF NZ421003
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF491 AA – O

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made.

Combat report for the 31st of August 1943
Stirling “O” at a position 6 miles due West of the target flying at 13,000 ft. at 210,ph. I.A.S. on a course 294 (M).

Visibility was fair with 6/10 cloud and fires on the ground were illuminating the sky. There was very moderate flak but no searchlights in the immediate vicinity. The I.F.F. was off.

The front gunner (W/O Sckripsey) saw an unidentified E/A on the port bow up to 600 yards carrying a white light in the nose. When the E/A was on the port bow, he opened fire with a 3/4 second burst, the light was immediately extinguished and the E/A was not seen again.

The front Gunner was trained at 14 O.T.U., 1665 C.U.

Document No. 103 (AIR 50/192/150)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Clifford Charles Pownall Logan, RAAF AUS.405918
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE881 JN – G

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eighteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb., 500lb. and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. Two aircraft failed to take-off and four did not return, the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Large fires were seen, although rather scattered they appeared to be progressing very well. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered and one air craft received slight damage. Enemy night-fighters were in great prominence, the aircraft piloted by F/Sgt. Wilkinson, G encountered a JU88 approaching from astern 500yds away. The rear gunner fired a long burst, the enemy aircraft replied and stalled. The mid-upper gunner then fired three long bursts. The enemy aircraft was seen to fall away and is claimed as probably destroyed. Our aircraft received damage to the rear of the fuselage and had part of the tail-plane and fin badly damaged. The aircraft captained by F/O Alexander sighted two Me109’s, the first opened fire from the starboard quarter and the rear gunner replied with a short burst. The enemy aircraft stalled and the mid-upper gunner fired a short burst. The enemy aircraft then dived to the ground and exploded, it was claimed to be destroyed. The second Me109 opened fire with a short burst from the port bow to the port quarter. The rear gunner then fired a short burst and tracer was seen to enter the enemy aircraft, which dived. It was claimed as possible destroyed. The aircraft captained by W/O Moseley, P. sighted a Me110 on the port quarter, the mid upper and rear gunner fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft turned over and dived with smoke pouring from its starboard side. It was claimed as probably destroyed. The aircraft captained by by P/O C.Logan sighted a Me109 sixty yards astern, the mid-upper and rear gunner fired and tracer from the rear gunner was seen to hit the aircraft. The Stirling then corkscrewed and the Me109 disappeared. It was claimed to be damaged. Two other aircraft crash landed away from base due to damage caused by enemy fighters, none of the crews were injured however. 8/10ths cloud was encountered on the outward journey and 9’10ths at the target, visibility, nevertheless, was good. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft were Stirlings MK.III EE918 captained by F/Sgt. Roberts,E, EE878 captained by F/Sgt. Henley, D, EE905 captained by F/Sgt. Helm,G. and EF501 captained by F/S McGregor, K.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Possibly damaged

Combat report for the 31st of August 1943
Stirling “G” over the target and while bombing, flying at 13,000 ft. at 180 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 336 (T)

The R/G (F/Sgt. Knox) sighted an ME.109 on the port quarter up at a range of 200 yards. He immediately opened fire with a long burst and the E/A without opening fire, closed to 50 yards and then broke away on the port quarter down. The M/U gunner (Sgt. Crowther) was able to get in a short burst and both gunners saw hits on the E/A, which is presumed to be damaged.

Visibility at the time was very good due to the number of flares being dropped by enemy aircraft.

The R G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483 Gunnery FLight.
The M/U was trained at 1 A.G.S., 16 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483 Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 103 (AIR 50/192/151 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Albert John Knox, RNZAF NZ416006
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE881 JN – G

Document No. 104 (AIR 50/192/152)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Munchen-Gladbach
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Clifford Charles Pownall Logan, RAAF AUS.405918
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH935 JN – K

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Possibly destroyed

Combat report for the 31st of August 1943
Munchen-Gladbach 12.000 ft. 0221 hrs.

Our Stirling, whilst on the bombing run over target at 12,000 ft. I.A.S. 180 mph and a course of 156(T) was intercepted by a ME.110.

The visibility was good because of ground fires. There were no searchlights in the immediate vicinity and the I.F.F. was off. The flak was very moderate.

The R/G (F/Sgt. Knox) first sighted the ME.110 , who was not carrying lights, dead astern about 600 yards away, silhouetted against searchlights.

The R/G gave the Pilot the orders to corkscrew, and fired a long burst at the incoming ME.110, observing hits. The E/A veered a little to the starboard quarter, and the M/U gunner (Sgt. Crowther) also commenced firing. The E/A opened fire an the bomber at about 200 yards, but the Stirling sustained no damage. The E/A finally disappeared on the starboard beam down. The crew of the Stirling noticed dense smoke issuing from the E/A, as it went down in a steep dive. The E/A is claimed as possibly destroyed.

The R G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483 Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at 1 A.G.S., 16 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483 Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 104 (AIR 50/192/153 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Munchen-Gladbach
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Albert John Knox, RNZAF NZ416006
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH935 JN – K

Document No. 104 (AIR 50/192/154 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Munchen-Gladbach
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Frederick Edward William Crowther, RAFVR 1339159
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH935 JN – K

Document No. 105 (AIR 50/192/155)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: W/O Phillip Hartstein, RAFVR 1390001/ 158031
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF454 AA – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eighteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb., 500lb. and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. Two aircraft failed to take-off and four did not return, the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Large fires were seen, although rather scattered they appeared to be progressing very well. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered and one air craft received slight damage. Enemy night-fighters were in great prominence, the aircraft piloted by F/Sgt. Wilkinson, G encountered a JU88 approaching from astern 500yds away. The rear gunner fired a long burst, the enemy aircraft replied and stalled. The mid-upper gunner then fired three long bursts. The enemy aircraft was seen to fall away and is claimed as probably destroyed. Our aircraft received damage to the rear of the fuselage and had part of the tail-plane and fin badly damaged. The aircraft captained by F/O Alexander sighted two Me109’s, the first opened fire from the starboard quarter and the rear gunner replied with a short burst. The enemy aircraft stalled and the mid-upper gunner fired a short burst. The enemy aircraft then dived to the ground and exploded, it was claimed to be destroyed. The second Me109 opened fire with a short burst from the port bow to the port quarter. The rear gunner then fired a short burst and tracer was seen to enter the enemy aircraft, which dived. It was claimed as possible destroyed. The aircraft captained by W/O Moseley, P. sighted a Me110 on the port quarter, the mid upper and rear gunner fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft turned over and dived with smoke pouring from its starboard side. It was claimed as probably destroyed. The aircraft captained by P/O C.Logan sighted a Me109 sixty yards astern, the mid-upper and rear gunner fired and tracer from the rear gunner was seen to hit the aircraft. The Stirling then corkscrewed and the Me109 disappeared. It was claimed to be damaged. Two other aircraft crash landed away from base due to damage caused by enemy fighters, none of the crews were injured however. 8/10ths cloud was encountered on the outward journey and 9’10ths at the target, visibility, nevertheless, was good. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft were Stirlings MK.III EE918 captained by F/Sgt. Roberts,E, EE878 captained by F/Sgt. Henley, D, EE905 captained by F/Sgt. Helm,G. and EF501 captained by F/S McGregor, K.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: The fuselage was holed with cannon shell, and machine gun bullets pierced the tyre, and one of the Petrol Tank Controls was severed.
Claim made: Claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 31st of August 1943
Berlin 1 mile N. 13.000 ft. 23.51 hrs.

Our Stirling, 1 mile North of Berlin with bombs just dropped was intercepted by a JU.88. Out a/c was flying at 13,000 ft. with I.A.S. 175 m.p.h. on a course of 248(M).
The visibility was very good because of the reflected light, from cloud, of the enemy flares.
The second Pilot noticed tracer coming up from below and entering the starboard main-plane. The Pilot corkscrewed, and the M/U gunner (F/Sgt. O’Sullivan) sighted a JU.88 on the port beam up. The M/U gunner fired three two second bursts as the E/A crossed over to the starboard beam without firing at the bomber.
The R/G (F/Sgt. Eaton) waited till the E/A backed almost to the starboard quarter, and he opened fire with a three second burst. The E/A went down after hits had been observed by both gunners.
The E/A is claimed as damaged. Our a/c suffered minor damage. The fuselage was holed with cannon shell, and machine gun bullets pierced the tyre, and one of the Petrol Tank Controls was severed.

The R/G was trained at 14 O.T.U. – 1651 C.U. 1483 Gunnery Flight.

The M/U was trained at 14 O.T.U. – 1651 C.U. 1483 Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 105 (AIR 50/192/156 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Thomas Charles O’Sullivan, RAAF AUS.415736
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF454 AA – A

Document No. 106 (AIR 50/192/157)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Ernest Stanley Wilkinson, RNZAF NZ417138
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE898 AA – N

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eighteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb., 500lb. and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. Two aircraft failed to take-off and four did not return, the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Large fires were seen, although rather scattered they appeared to be progressing very well. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered and one air craft received slight damage. Enemy night-fighters were in great prominence, the aircraft piloted by F/Sgt. Wilkinson, G encountered a JU88 approaching from astern 500yds away. The rear gunner fired a long burst, the enemy aircraft replied and stalled. The mid-upper gunner then fired three long bursts. The enemy aircraft was seen to fall away and is claimed as probably destroyed. Our aircraft received damage to the rear of the fuselage and had part of the tail-plane and fin badly damaged. The aircraft captained by F/O Alexander sighted two Me109’s, the first opened fire from the starboard quarter and the rear gunner replied with a short burst. The enemy aircraft stalled and the mid-upper gunner fired a short burst. The enemy aircraft then dived to the ground and exploded, it was claimed to be destroyed. The second Me109 opened fire with a short burst from the port bow to the port quarter. The rear gunner then fired a short burst and tracer was seen to enter the enemy aircraft, which dived. It was claimed as possible destroyed. The aircraft captained by W/O Moseley, P. sighted a Me110 on the port quarter, the mid upper and rear gunner fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft turned over and dived with smoke pouring from its starboard side. It was claimed as probably destroyed. The aircraft captained by P/O C.Logan sighted a Me109 sixty yards astern, the mid-upper and rear gunner fired and tracer from the rear gunner was seen to hit the aircraft. The Stirling then corkscrewed and the Me109 disappeared. It was claimed to be damaged. Two other aircraft crash landed away from base due to damage caused by enemy fighters, none of the crews were injured however. 8/10ths cloud was encountered on the outward journey and 9’10ths at the target, visibility, nevertheless, was good. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft were Stirlings MK.III EE918 captained by F/Sgt. Roberts,E, EE878 captained by F/Sgt. Henley, D, EE905 captained by F/Sgt. Helm,G. and EF501 captained by F/S McGregor, K.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: The Stirling had half a starboard tail plane shot away, and the fin and rudder were holed.
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 31st of August 1943
52.20 N. 13.30 E. 11,500 ft. 23.53

Stirling “N” at a position 52.20N, 13.30E. Flying at 11,500 ft. at 160 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 305(M).
Visibility was good due to many flares, and somebody had jettisoned their incendiaries.
The R/G (F/Sgt. Wilkinson) sighted a JU.88 on the port quarter down at 600 yards. he instructed the Pilot to corkscrew port and the E/A closed round to dead astern. At 400 yards the R/G opened fire with a long burst, and two seconds later the E/A opened fire with cannon and machine gun. The E/A came in on the port quarter up and the M/U gunner (Sgt. Robson) opened fire with three short bursts and hits were seen on the E/A. The Stirling had half a starboard tail plane shot away, and the fin and rudder were holed.
Just prior to the combat a Boozer contact was made, the Pilot corkscrewed and had just straightened up when the E/A was sighted.

The R/G was trained at 2. A.G.S., 11 O.T.U. and the C.U. Oakington.
The M/U was trained at 2. A.G.S., 1651 C.U. and 1483 Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 106 (AIR 50/192/158 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. E.S. Robson, RAFVR 1810690
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE898 AA – N

Document No. 106 (AIR 50/192/159 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S George Stanley Wilkinson, RAFVR 642538
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE898 AA – N

Document No. 107 (AIR 50/192/160)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. William Hamish ‘Mac’ McDonald, RNZAF NZ417219
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH880 AA – J

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eighteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb., 500lb. and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. Two aircraft failed to take-off and four did not return, the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Large fires were seen, although rather scattered they appeared to be progressing very well. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered and one air craft received slight damage. Enemy night-fighters were in great prominence, the aircraft piloted by F/Sgt. Wilkinson, G encountered a JU88 approaching from astern 500yds away. The rear gunner fired a long burst, the enemy aircraft replied and stalled. The mid-upper gunner then fired three long bursts. The enemy aircraft was seen to fall away and is claimed as probably destroyed. Our aircraft received damage to the rear of the fuselage and had part of the tail-plane and fin badly damaged. The aircraft captained by F/O Alexander sighted two Me109’s, the first opened fire from the starboard quarter and the rear gunner replied with a short burst. The enemy aircraft stalled and the mid-upper gunner fired a short burst. The enemy aircraft then dived to the ground and exploded, it was claimed to be destroyed. The second Me109 opened fire with a short burst from the port bow to the port quarter. The rear gunner then fired a short burst and tracer was seen to enter the enemy aircraft, which dived. It was claimed as possible destroyed. The aircraft captained by W/O Moseley, P. sighted a Me110 on the port quarter, the mid upper and rear gunner fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft turned over and dived with smoke pouring from its starboard side. It was claimed as probably destroyed. The aircraft captained by P/O C.Logan sighted a Me109 sixty yards astern, the mid-upper and rear gunner fired and tracer from the rear gunner was seen to hit the aircraft. The Stirling then corkscrewed and the Me109 disappeared. It was claimed to be damaged. Two other aircraft crash landed away from base due to damage caused by enemy fighters, none of the crews were injured however. 8/10ths cloud was encountered on the outward journey and 9/10ths at the target, visibility, nevertheless, was good. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft were Stirlings MK.III EE918 captained by F/Sgt. Roberts,E, EE878 captained by F/Sgt. Henley, D, EE905 captained by F/Sgt. Helm,G. and EF501 captained by F/S McGregor, K.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 2 x Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Me.109 claimed as destroyed. 1 Me.109 claimed as presumed damaged

Combat report for the 31st of August 1943
Berlin. 17,000 ft. 23.49 Hrs.

Stirling “J”, over the target and immediately after bombing, was flying at 17,000 ft. at 165 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 299(M).
Visibility was very good at the time, due to a large number of enemy flares being dropped.
The R/G (Sgt. McDonald) sighted an ME.109 on the starboard quarter down at a range of 400 yards, the E/A opened fire with cannon and machine gun, the R/G instructed the pilot to corkscrew starboard and opened fire with a three second burst. The E/A ceased fire and broke off up to the starboard quarter at 100-200 yards, and the M/U gunner (F/Sgt. Lyon) and the R/G both fired and many hits were observed. The E/A appeared to fall over the Stirling to the port beam and disappeared down. The Captain and the Engineer saw the E/A explode on the ground.
The E/A is claimed as destroyed.

Thirty seconds later on the same heading, the Engineer in the astrodome sighted an ME.109 on the port bow up at 200 yards, the E/A opened fire with a short burst and then closed round to dead astern. The R/G opened fire with a four-second burst and he and the M/U gunner saw hits on the E/A, which broke away on the starboard quarter down and was not seen again.
The E/A is presumed to be damaged

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483 Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at 12 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483 Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 107 (AIR 50/192/161 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Armstrong ‘Doc’ Lyon, RCAF R.108340
Position: Mid Upper
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH880 AA – J

Document No. 108 (AIR 50/192/162)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: W/O Philip Albin Miles Moseley, RAFVR 1389095/ 158020
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE958 AA – V

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eighteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb., 500lb. and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. Two aircraft failed to take-off and four did not return, the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Large fires were seen, although rather scattered they appeared to be progressing very well. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered and one air craft received slight damage. Enemy night-fighters were in great prominence, the aircraft piloted by F/Sgt. Wilkinson, G encountered a JU88 approaching from astern 500yds away. The rear gunner fired a long burst, the enemy aircraft replied and stalled. The mid-upper gunner then fired three long bursts. The enemy aircraft was seen to fall away and is claimed as probably destroyed. Our aircraft received damage to the rear of the fuselage and had part of the tail-plane and fin badly damaged. The aircraft captained by F/O Alexander sighted two Me109’s, the first opened fire from the starboard quarter and the rear gunner replied with a short burst. The enemy aircraft stalled and the mid-upper gunner fired a short burst. The enemy aircraft then dived to the ground and exploded, it was claimed to be destroyed. The second Me109 opened fire with a short burst from the port bow to the port quarter. The rear gunner then fired a short burst and tracer was seen to enter the enemy aircraft, which dived. It was claimed as possible destroyed. The aircraft captained by W/O Moseley, P. sighted a Me110 on the port quarter, the mid upper and rear gunner fired a long burst and the enemy aircraft turned over and dived with smoke pouring from its starboard side. It was claimed as probably destroyed. The aircraft captained by P/O C.Logan sighted a Me109 sixty yards astern, the mid-upper and rear gunner fired and tracer from the rear gunner was seen to hit the aircraft. The Stirling then corkscrewed and the Me109 disappeared. It was claimed to be damaged. Two other aircraft crash landed away from base due to damage caused by enemy fighters, none of the crews were injured however. 8/10ths cloud was encountered on the outward journey and 9’10ths at the target, visibility, nevertheless, was good. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft were Stirlings MK.III EE918 captained by F/Sgt. Roberts,E, EE878 captained by F/Sgt. Henley, D, EE905 captained by F/Sgt. Helm,G. and EF501 captained by F/S McGregor, K.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 31st of August 1943
52.30 N. 13.19 E. 11,000 ft. 23.52 hrs.

Stirling “V” at a position 52.30 N. 13.19 E. flying at 11,000 ft. at 180 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 250(M).
Visibility was very good due to large number of enemy flares being dropped in big bundles.
The engineer in the astrodome sighted a twin-engined E/A on the starboard beam up at 400-500 yards and it was identified as a Me.110
The E/A overshot the Stirling, and turned in to attack from the port quarter up.
Both M/U (Sgt. Middleton) and R/G (Sgt. North) opened fire at 250-300 yards and the Pilot was instructed to corkscrew port. The E/A opened fire at 200 yards, but no hits were made on the Stirling. Many hits were seen on the E/A, which broke away on the starboard beam down with smoke pouring from its starboard engine.
The E/A is claimed as damage.

The R/G was trained at 9 A.G.S., 26 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., 1483 B Gunnery Flight.

The M/U was trained at 9 A.G.S., 26 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., 1483 B Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 108 (AIR 50/192/163 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. C. Middleton, RAFVR 1054890
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Mk.III EE958 AA – V

Document No. 108 (AIR 50/192/164 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 31st of August 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Berlin
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. A. North, RAFVR 1287534
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Mk.III EE958 AA – V

Document No. 109 (AIR 50/192/165)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 2nd of September 1943 – Mining in the Frisian Islands
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O John David Grubb, RNZAF NZ415068
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Mk.III EF130 JN – M

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Five aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with mines of 1,500lb., One aircraft returned early owing to a navigational failure, and brought its mines back. The remainder however, successfully dropped their mines in the allotted area, although the parachutes were not seen to open owing to 4/10th cloud. No A.A. fire or searchlights were encountered. One unidentified aircraft was seen and a short combat took place, but no damage was sustained to our aircraft. The weather was good on the outward route, but fog and patchy cloud was prevalent in the mining area. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made.

Combat report for the 2nd of September 1943
53.20 N. 04.45 E. 6,500 ft. 22.11

Stirling “M” returning from gardening with mines still on board, at a position 53.20 N. 04.45 E. flying at 170 m.p.h. I.A.S. at 6,500 ft. on a course of 258(T)
Visibility was fair with slight haze, but no cloud The I.F.F. was off.
The M/U gunner (Sgt. Gilliland) sighted an E/A carrying a white light, on the port beam level at 600 yards. He instructed the Pilot to corkscrew port, and opened fire with a short burst, and the E/A broke away and was not seen again.
As soon as the pilot xxxxxed course, the R/G (Sgt. Chatfield) sighted an E/A carrying a green light, dead astern at 600 yards. He instructed the Pilot to corkscrew starboard, and opened fire. the E/A immediately broke away on the ort quarter, and was not seen again.

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 109 (AIR 50/192/166 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 2nd of September 1943 – Mining in the Frisian Islands
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Robert Gilliland, RCAF R.138682/ J.85466
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Mk.III EF130 JN – M

Document No. 109 (AIR 50/192/167 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 2nd of September 1943 – Mining in the Frisian Islands
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Albert George Chatfield, RNZAF NZ425546
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Mk.III EF130 JN – M

Document No. 110 (AIR 50/192/168)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Richard Charles Whitmore, RNZAF NZ421123
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Mk.III EH877 JN – C

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nineteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with incendiary bombs of 30lb. and 4lb. One aircraft had trouble shortly after take-off and was forced to jettison its bombs four miles north of CAMBRIDGE. The attack was well concentrated and large fires together with heavy explosions were seen. Moderate heavy A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered, which were ineffective. One aircraft on the return journey when near the FRENCH Coast was hit by A.A. fire. It received considerable damage and two of its engines were made unserviceable. The ENGLISH Coast was reached however, it belly-landed at Hunsden. Many fighters were seen and some combats took, place. The aircraft captained by F/Sgt. H.BATGER sighted an enemy aircraft on the port quarter which opened fire on them and our aircraft corkscrewed. The Mid-upper and Rear Gunner then opened fire and the enemy aircraft was seen to dive to the ground in flames. It was claimed as destroyed. Our aircraft received considerable damage and the Flight Engineer Sgt. R. DALKINS was seriously wounded. The aircraft captained by F/Sgt. R. WHITMORE sighted an enemy aircraft 100yds. astern, the Mid-upper and Rear Gunners opened fire, the enemy aircraft was seen to turn over and spin into the ground afire. It was claimed as destroyed. This was flowed by another enemy aircraft approaching from starboard to port astern, the Mid-upper and Rear Gunners again fired and the enemy aircraft broke away. One minute later an unidentified aircraft was seen firing at a Lancaster aircraft, which was afire. F/Sgt. WHITMORE’s Mid-Upper and Rear Gunners opened fire on the enemy aircraft, which disappeared. The Lancaster was then seen to break up. Some cloud was encountered on the way to the target, but there was a clear sky and visibility was good in the target area. Navigation was very good. One aircraft failed to return, it was captained by F/Sgt. WILKINSON, E.S.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109/ Unknown E/A/ Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none/ none/ none
Claim made: possibly destroyed in first encounter. No claims for other 2 encounters

Combat report for the 5th of September 1943
Mannheim 12,000 ft. 23.13

Stirling “C”, whilst bombing the target, flying at 12,000 ft. speed 180 m.p.h. I.A.S. on course 060(M), noticed an Me.109 passing from the port beam to port quarter, 300 yards away. The E/A turned, came round to the starboard quarter, and came into attack.

The R/G (Sgt. Waerea) and M/U (Sgt. Chesson) both opened fire with long bursts. The E/A turned over, righted himself for an instant, then went down in flames on the starboard beam. At the time of this interception the visibility was very good, because it took place in a lane of searchlights, and because of the fires on the ground. There was no flak and the I.F.F. was off.
One minute later, on the same course, when the bomb doors had just closed, both gunners saw an unidentified S/E E/A on the port beam up at a range of 300 yards. Both gunners fired a 3-4 second bursts whilst the Stirling was corkscrewing. No hits were observed and the S/E E/A disappeared down the port quarter. As in the first interception, no answering fire was received from the E/A.
Immediately after this, the M/U gunner noticed a four engined bomber about 500 yards away on the port beam, in combat with a S/E E/A. The E/A was dead astern of the bomber, pouring quick into it, which was now out of control and in flames. No answering fire was seen coming from either of the bombers turrets. Both the gunners of our Stirling fired at the E/A, who broke off his attack on the other bomber and disappeared to port down.
This was our Stirling crew’s first main target – they acquitted themselves well in an ideal cool, offensive manner.

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1665 C.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight

The M/U was trained at 4 A.G.S., 11 O.T.U., 1665 C.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery flight.

Document No. 110 (AIR 50/192/169 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Tame Hawaikirangi Waerea, RNZAF NZ421300
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH877 JN – C

Document No. 110 (AIR 50/192/170 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Frederick John Charles Chesson, RAFVR 1336122
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH877 JN – C

Document No. 111 (AIR 50/192/171)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O Ian Robert Menzies, RNZAF NZ415002
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK777 AA – U

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 5th of September 1943
49.23 N. 07.13 E. 12,000 ft. 23.38 hrs.

Stirling “U” at a position 49.23 N. 07.13 E. flying at 12,000 ft. at 165 M.P.H. I.A.S. on a course of 277(M).
Visibility was good, and there was no flak or searchlight activity at thee time. The I.F.F. was off.
The R?G (Sgt. Muir) sighted an unidentified E/A on the port quarter level at 1,000 yards. The E/A closed to 800 yards, and the R/G instructed the pilot to corkscrew port. At 600-700 yards, the R/G opened fire with a three second burst. The E/A immediately broke away down and was not seen again.

The R/G was trained at 11.O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 111 (AIR 50/192/172 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Stewart Donald Muir, RNZAF NZ416967
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK777 AA – U

Document No. 112 – 113 (AIR 50/192/173)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Warwick Harold Batger, RNZAF NZ421003
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF435 ?? – Y

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 3 x Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: The E/A fired short bursts of cannon and machine-gun fire, and raked the underside of the bomber, injuring the engineer in the face.
Claim made: 1 x probale destroyed 2 x no claim

Combat report for the 5th of September 1943
Our Stirling “Y”, with bomb doors open, flying at 15,000 ft, I.A.S. 180, on a course of 100(T), was intercepted three times in as many minutes by ME.109’s
The visibility was very good, because of fires and searchlights. The flak was very scattered, and most of it was exploding above our a/c.
The M/U gunner (Sgt. Billington) and R/G(Sgt. Manns) spotted the first ME.109 about 400 yards away slightly up on the starboard quarter. The E/A did not fire, but came in to about 200 yards, and broke away up the port beam. On this unorthodox breakaway, the M/U gunner, and for part of the time, the R/G, had a comparatively simple task to fill the E/A exposed belly with bullets. Numerous hits were observed, the A/C fell over down to port, with flames issuing freely.
At this time, another ME.109 was noticed, on the port quarter down, about 600 yards range. The E/A fired short bursts of cannon and machine-gun fire, and raked the underside of the bomber, injuring the engineer in the face.

The R/G gave the order to corkscrew, and opened fire at the E/A, who broke off his attack on the port quarter. No hits were observed by the R/G an the E/A.

Simultaneously with the R/G giving the order to cease the corkscrew, the Front Gunner, who must be complimented on his quickness in leaving the bomb bay to climb into his turret, noticed another ME.109 dead ahead slightly up, range about 150 yards. The pilot dived the a/c steeply, and the F/G fired a very short burst at the E/A, but no hits were observed. The ME.109 disappeared over the Stirling.

By this time the Stirling was down to 12,000 ft. and was holed in various places with cannon and M/G fire.

N.B. Two minutes later, the crew observed a Halifax weaving from the starboard bow to port bow. The R/G of the Halifax gave the Stirling a short burst and the tracer passed close to the starboard main-plane . The Stirling corkscrewed.

R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1665 C.U., 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.
M/U was trained at 1.A.G>S., 11 O.T.U., 1665 C.U. 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 112 – 113 (AIR 50/192/174 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Clifford Billington, RAFVR 539902
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF435 ?? – Y

Document No. 112 – 113 (AIR 50/192/175 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Jack Manns, RAFVR 1580583
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF435 ?? – Y

Document No. 114 (AIR 50/192/176)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 17th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Modene
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O John Lefevre Mitchell, RAFVR 1387449/ 155859
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF135 AA – T

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nineteen aircraft wee detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb.,and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. One aircraft returned early, but the remainder dropped their bombs in the target area. This was a very successful and well concentrated attack. Large fires which appeared to be spreading and heavy explosions were seen. Some A.A. fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered, they were ineffective except for one aircraft which received damage. The port inner engine caught fire but what put out with the aid of a fire extinguisher, the propeller was then feathered and the aircraft continued its journey on three engines. A few enemy aircraft were seen, the aircraft captained by P/O. G.K.WILLIAMS had a combat with a JU 88 which was claimed as destroyed. One other short combat took place, but no damage was sustained to our aircraft. It was clear over the target and visibility was good. Navigation was good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Stirling bomber
Damage to our aircraft: many hits had been made in both wings and in the fin and rudder.
Claim made: No claim made.

Combat report for the 17th of September 1943
49.17 N. 00.08 E. 10,000 ft. 02.31 hrs

Stirling “T” at a position 49.17 N. 00.08 E. flying at 170 m.p.h. I.A.S. at 10,000 ft. on a course of 358(M).
Visibility was good with a very bright moon dead astern. There was no flak or searchlight activity at the time, but two flares had just been dropped on the starboard beam about 1,000 yards away.
The F/G (P/O Longman) sighted another Stirling on the starboard bow at a range of 800 yards. The other Stirling started to cross from starboard to port, and when directly ahead and at 200 yards, started to corkscrew port and opened fire on our Stirlling , who immediately corkscrewed starboard, but many hits had been made in both wings and in the fin and rudder. The other Stirling dived away to port and was not seen again.
The above encounter was seen by the pilot, 2nd Pilot, front gunner and the engineer in the astrodome.

Document No. 114 (AIR 50/192/177 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 17th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Modene
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Sidney Albert Longman, RAFVR 1318852/ 155104
Position: Air Bomber
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF135 AA – T

Document No. 115 (AIR 50/192/178)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 17th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Modene
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Gordon Kenneth Williams, RNZAF NZ401796
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF461 JN – B

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nineteen aircraft wee detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000lb.,and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb. One aircraft returned early, but the remainder dropped their bombs in the target area. This was a very successful and well concentrated attack. Large fires which appeared to be spreading and heavy explosions were seen. Some A.A.fire co-operating with searchlights were encountered, they were ineffective except for one aircraft which received damage. The port inner engine caught fire but what put out with the aid of a fire extinguisher, the propeller was then feathered and the aircraft continued its journey on three engines. A few enemy aircraft were seen, the aircraft captained by P/O. G.K.WILLIAMS had a combat with a JU 88 which was claimed as destroyed. One other short combat took place, but no damage was sustained to our aircraft. It was clear over the target and visibility was good. Navigation was good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 2 x Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: First Ju.88 claimed as destroyed, second Ju.88 claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 17th of September 1943
48.58N. 00.07E 10,000 ft. 02.25hrs

Stirling “B” at a position 48.58N. 00.07E., flying at 10,000 ft. at 165 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 331(M).
There was no flak or searchlight activity at the time and the visibility was very good with a very bright moon on the port quarter.

The Engineer in the astrodome sighted a JU.88 on the starboard beam up, carrying a red light on the starboard wing-tip and a white light on the port wing-tip. The M/U gunner (P/O Black) opened fire with a long burst, and instructed the pilot to do a diving turn starboard. The F/G (Sgt. McGregor) opened fire at the same time. The R/G (Sgt. Ingrey) during the turn was able to get in a short burst. The E/A caught fire and all three gunners opened fire, and the E/A blew up and went down in pieces, and was seen to hit the ground.
The E/A is claimed as destroyed.

Four minutes later, the R/G sighted a JU.88 on the port quarter up at 400 yards. The R/G opened fire with a three second burst, and instructed the pilot to do a diving turn port. The M/U opened fire with a short burst, strikes were observed by both gunners and the engineer, and as the E/A dived away down from port to starboard, the R/G followed him down with another burst.
The E/A is claimed as damaged.

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.
The F/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U.

Document No. 115 (AIR 50/192/179 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 17th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Modene
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Francis Edward McGregor, RNZAF NZ415338
Position: Air Bomber
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF461 JN – B

Document No. 115 (AIR 50/192/180 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 17th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Modene
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O John Arthur Black, RAAF AUS.425420
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF461 JN – B

Document No. 116 (AIR 50/192/181)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 16th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Modene
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. Richard Broadbent, RNZAF NZ391339
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK778 JN – U

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Stirling
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim

Combat report for the 16th of September 1943
48.00N. 00.20 E. 9,000 ft. 22.30 hrs.

Stirling “U” at a position 48.00 N. 00.20 E. flying at 9,000 ft. at 165 M.P.H. I.A.S. on a course of 156(T).
Visibility was good with no cloud and bright moonlight.

The F/G (P/O) Belford) sighted another Stirling on the starboard bow at 600 yards. The Stirling was crossing, and when on the port bow opened fire and dived away to port.
Our aircraft dived starboard and the other Stirling was not seen again.
Our aircraft was not hit.

(an added handwritten note)

“During the encounter the other Stirling fired off the enemy recognition cartridge.”

Document No. 116 (AIR 50/192/182 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 16th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Modene
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Earl Ray Belford, RCAF R.88751/ J.17419
Position: Air Bomber/ Front Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK778 JN – U

Document No. 117 (AIR 50/192/183)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 22nd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/Lt. Geoffrey Turner, RCAF J.7326
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH949 JN – P

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twenty aircraft were detailed to carry out the above attacks with bombs of 1,000lb. and incendiaries of 30lb. and 4lb.. Three aircraft returned early, but the remainder dropped their bombs in the target area. This was a very successful and concentrated attack. Numerous fires which appeared to be merging into one large fire were seen, and were still visible as the aircraft were returning over the DUTCH Coast. Heavy A.A. fire and a great number of searchlights were encountered, but proved ineffective. Several enemy aircraft were seen and one of our Stirlings was hit, but the attacker was not seen, damage was received to the tail and main-plane, and the port petrol tanks were punctured. The aircraft, however, was safely flown back to base and a crash landing was made with three engines. It was clear over the target and visibility was excellent. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: damage in tail plane fuselage and the main plane was holed in various places. Small fires started inside the a/c but were extinguished by the crew.
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 22nd of September 1943
52.20 N. 09.20 E. 14,000 ft. 21.44 hrs

Our Stirling “P” at a position 52.20 N. 09.20 E. flying at 14,000 ft. Just after leaving the target on a course of 302(T) and an I.A.S. of 202 m.p.h. had two boozer contacts in quick succession. Immediately after the first contact the captain corkscrewed to starboard, but coinciding with the second contact our a/c was hit with cannon and M/G fire.

The visibility was very good with a lot of searchlight activity. There was no flak at this time.
No E/A was seen, but the R/G (F/Sgt. McRae) fired a short burst where he thought the enemy tracer was coming from.
Our a/c suffered damage in tail plane fuselage and the main plane was holed in various places. Small fires started inside the a/c but were extinguished by the crew.
None of the crew was injured.

The R/G was trained at No.3 McDonald, 12 ).T.U.,1651 C.U. and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at No. 2.A.G.S., 12 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 117 ( AIR 50/192/184 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 22nd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Christopher Frederick McCrae, RCAF R.147326
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH949 JN – P

Document No. 118 – 119 (AIR 50/192/185)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O John Lefevre Mitchell, RAFVR 1387449/ 155859
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF152 JN – T

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eighteen aircraft were detailed to carry the above operation with incendiary bombs of 30lb. and 4lb.. Three aircraft failed to return, but the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. This was, undoubtedly, a good attack, concentrated fires which were spreading to the West, and large heavy explosions were seen. Moderate heavy A.A. fire and a large curtain of searchlights were encountered, but caused no trouble. Enemy aircraft were very active and several combats took place. The aircraft captained by W/O. P. MOSELEY had a combat with a JU88 which was claimed as a probably destroyed. In the action our aircraft received damage the Pilot W/O. P. MOSELEY and the Mid Upper Sgt. C(?) MIDDLETON were slightly injured. The aircraft captained by P/O A. BURLEY had three combats with enemy aircraft, one of which was claimed as destroyed, the two as damaged. The weather was good with clear visibility. Navigation was excellent. The missing aircraft were Stirlings Mk.111 EF459 captained by P/O C.C. LOGAN, EH946 captained by F/Lt. G. TURNER , and EH935 captained by F/O L. KIRKPATRICK.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: FW.190
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as probably damaged

Combat report for the 23rd of September 1943
49.27 N. 0′.27 E. 13,000 ft. 22.00 hrs.

With very good visibility prevailing because of flares and searchlights, our Stirling “T” was intercepted twice by E/A in the proximity of the target.

“The first interception took place over the target with bombs still on board, at 21.57 hrs. The Stirling was flying at 15,000 ft. at a speed of 170 (I) on a course of 145(M), when the R/G (Sgt. Shinn) noticed a S/E E/A on the starboard quarter, range 600 yards, with a “”big white light in front””. He gave orders to the Captain to corkscrew to starboard, and the orthodox search was carried out, i.e. the R/G concentrated on this E/A and the M/U gunner (Sgt. Newman) continued to search his prescribed sector.
The R/G opened fire on the E/A at a range of 300-400 yards with a two second burst. The E/A did not return the fire, but was observed to open fire on another 4 engined a/c, flying about 600 yards slightly up on our bomber’s starboard beam. The E/A disappeared on the starboard quarter down.
Three minutes later at 22.00hrs., while the bomb doors of our a/c were closing, our bomber was attacked by an a/c, identified by the Stirling’s gunners as a FW.190.
At this time our bomber was flying at 13,000 ft. with an I.A.S. of 190 and a course of 206(M). Our bomber’s position was 49.27 N. 08.27 E.
The FW.190 was first seen by the M/U gunner about 200 yards away, turning from the starboard beam to the starboard quarter. The order was given to corkscrew to starboard, and both gunners opened fire with a two second burst. The E/A replied with a short burst, but broke away quickly to the port quarter below.
Our gunners observed hits on the FW.190, and two purple flashes were noticed.
The E/A is claimed as damaged. No hits were registered on our bomber.

The R/G was trained at 9 A.G.S., 1657 C.U., and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flt.
The M/U was trained at 2 A.G.S., 1657 C.U., and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 118 – 119 (AIR 50/192/186 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. G. Shinn, RAFVR 1445155
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF152 JN – T

Document No. 118 – 119 (AIR 50/192/187 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. V. Newman, RAFVR 642264
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF152 JN – T

Document No. 120 (AIR 50/192/188)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Arthur William Burley, RAFVR 1315375/ 147201
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF137 – Y

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: 1 x single engined E/A, 1/2 x twin engined E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Single engined E/A claimed as destroyed. 2 x twin engined aircraft both claimed as damaged.

Combat report for the 23rd of September 1943
Mannheim 13,500 ft. 21.54 hrs

Stirling “Y” over the target flying at 13,500 ft. at 160 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 146(M) with bomb doors open.
Visibility was very good with a lot of searchlight activity and many enemy flares were dropping. Flak was moderate.
The R/G (Sgt. Peters) sighted a single-engined E/A on the starboard quarter up at 500 yards. At 400 yards the E/A opened fire with cannon, the R/G instructed the pilot to corkscrew starboard and opened fire with a four second burst. The M/U gunner (F/O Strong) also opened fire with a four second burst. The E/A was seen by both gunners and the W/Op. in the astrodome to blow up and fall to the ground in flames. The E/A is claimed as destroyed.
One minute later the R/G sighted a T/E E/A on the port quarter up at 500 yards, and instructed the pilot to corkscrew port. This brought the E/A on the port below, and the M/U opened fire with a three second burst. The E/A dived away and was not seen again. Hits were seen on the E/A and it is claimed as damaged.
One minute later the M/U sighted a T/E E/A on the port quarter level at 400 yards. He instructed the pilot to corkscrew port and the R/G opened fire with two three second bursts. The E/A dived away and was not seen again. Hits were observed and the E/A is claimed as damaged.

The R/G was trained at 2.A.G.S., 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 120 (AIR 50/192/189 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O Stephen Alwyn Strong, RAAF AUS.42060
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF137 JN – Y

Document No. 120 (AIR 50/192/190 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. A.F. Peters, RAFVR 1154968
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF137 JN – Y

Document No. 121 (AIR 50/192/191)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: W/O Philip Albin Miles Moseley, RAFVR 1389095/ 158020
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE958 AA – V

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: The M/U gunner was wounded in the leg by a machine-gun bullet, and the Captain was also wounded in the leg with a fragment of cannon shell. The fuselage was holed, and the servo feed in the rear turret partially wrecked – 3 guns were rendered inoperative
Claim made: No claim made.

Combat report for the 23rd of September 1943
Mannheim 15,000 ft. 22.00 hrs.

Over the target with bombs still aboard, our Stirling “V” at 15,000 ft. with a speed of 165 m.p.h. (I) and flying on an approx. course of 135(M) was intercepted by a JU.88.
The M/U gunner (Sgt. Middleton) first sighted the E/A on the starboard bow up, range about 300 yards. The Ju.88 crossed under our Stirling and came up dead astern and below about 150 yards away.
The R/G (Sgt. North) gave the order to corkscrew, and immediately opened fire with a long burst at the oncoming JU.88, who by the time was firing at the Stirling.
The E/A hit the Stirling with cannon and machine gun, rendering three of the rear turret guns useless, but the R/G continued to fire with the remaining gun, and after he had observed hits on the JU.88 he saw it disappear astern and down.
Because of the searchlights and flares, the visibility was very good. There was no flak in the immediate vicinity.
The M/U gunner was wounded in the leg by a machine-gun bullet, and the Captain was also wounded in the leg with a fragment of cannon shell. The fuselage was holed, and the servo feed in the rear turret partially wrecked.
Sgt. North behaved thoughtfully and coolly in using his remaining gun, which probably deterred the pilot of the JU.88 from pressing home any further attack.

The R/G was trained at 9 A.G.S., 26 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., and 1483 Gunnery Flight
The M/U was trained at 9 A.G.S., 26 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., and 1483 Gunnery Flight

Document No. 121 (AIR 50/192/192 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. C. Middleton, RAFVR 1054890
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE958 AA – V

Document No. 121 (AIR 50/192/193 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 23rd of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. A. North, RAFVR 1287534
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE958 AA – V

Document No. 122 (AIR 50/192/194)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Henry Leonard Burton, RNZAF NZ415863
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF465 AA – H

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Sixteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with incendiary bombs of 30lb. and 4 lb. Two aircraft failed to return and one returned early owing to its rear turret being unserviceable. The remainder dropped their bombs in the target area. This was an exceedingly successful and well concentrated attack, considered to be even better than the previous one. Numerous large fires and columns of smoke rising to 12,000ft., were seen and the fires were again visible at the DUTCH coast. Very moderate, ineffective heavy A.A. Fire numerous searchlights and flares were encountered. Many enemy aircraft were seen and several combats took place. The aircraft captained by F.Sgt. HORGAN, D. had a combat with a JU88 which was claimed to be destroyed. The aircraft captained by F/Sgt. BURTON, H., sighted a JU88 and the Rear Gunner fired, it was then seen to fall in flames and was claimed as destroyed. Two other short combats took place and one of our aircraft received slight damage. The weather was poor on the outward and return journeys, but good with clear visibility over the target. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft were Stirlings Mk.III, EF515 captained by Sgt. Martin, R., and EH877 captained by F/Sgt. WHITMORE, R.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as destroyed

Combat report for the 27th of September 1943
Hannover 17,500 ft. 22.18 hours

Stirling “H” on the run up to the target with bombs still on board, flying at 17,500 ft. at 180 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 118 (M)
Visibility was good, but it was very dark with a slight haze below. There were many searchlights and many enemy flares were being dropped. Flak was moderate.
The R/G (Sgt. Anderson) sighted a JU.88 on the starboard quarter up at 300 yds. The E/A was flying through a cone of S/Ls. and the markings were easily seen. The E/A dipped one wing as though starting a curve of pursuit attack and the R/G instructed the pilot to turn starboard and he and the M/U (Sgt. McGregor) both opened fire with four second bursts. The E/A turned over and with flames pouring from it’s starboard engine went down. As the E/A was going down the R/G was able to get in another short burst. The two gunners did not watch the E/A go down as they carried on their search for other a/c, but the W/Op in the astrodome saw the E/A hit the ground.
During the combat a boozer contact was made.
The E/A is claimed as destroyed.

The R/G was trained at 9 A.G.S., 26 O.T.U., 1657 C.U., and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at 2 A.G.S., 26 O.T.U., 1657 C.U., and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 122 (AIR 50/192/195 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Thomas Andrew Anderson, RAFVR 1021289/ 172814
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF465 AA – H

Document No. 122 (AIR 50/192/196 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. R. McGregor, RAFVR 1699864
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF465 AA – H

Document No. 123 (AIR 50/192/197)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S William Stuart Masters, RNZAF NZ421077
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF461 JN – B

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 27th of September 1943
Hannover 13,600 ft. 22.19 hrs.

Stirling “B” over the target during the bombing run, flying at 13,600 ft. at 190 m.p.h. (I.A.S.) on a course of 119(M).
The R/G (Sgt. Crawford-Watson) sighted a ME.110 on the port quarter level at 200 yards. He instructed the pilot to corkscrew port and opened fire with a long burst. The E/A turned away to starboard and was not seen again.
Visibility was fair at the time, but there was a slight haze below and plenty of searchlights. Enemy flares were being dropped, and flak was moderate.

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 123 (AIR 50/192/198 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Lewis Stanley Crawford-Watson, RNZAF NZ42734
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BF461 JN – B

Document No. 124 (AIR 50/192/199)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. Frank Albert Andrews, RNZAF NZ391336
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF507 AA – P

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown Twin-engined aircraft
Damage to our aircraft: hits in the port engine nacelle and the port tyre was punctured.
Claim made: no claim made

Combat report for the 27th of September 1943
52.10 N. 09.45 E. 16,000 ft. 22.13 hrs.

Our Stirling “P” just after leaving the target at a position 52.10n. 09.45 E. flying at 16,000 ft. at 204 knots on a course of 291(T).
Visibility was good, but it was very dark, with a slight haze below. Searchlights were active over the target, but none on our a/c.
The R/G (Sgt. Shaw) sighted a twin-engined E/A on the port quarter below at 8000 yards. He instructed the pilot to corkscrew port, and the E/A was thought to be lost and course was resumed, when cannon and machine-gun fire was seen coming from dead astern. The E/A was seen on the port fine quarter at 600 yards, the corkscrew was resumed, and the R/G opened fire with a burst of four seconds. The E/A dived away down and was not seen again.
No hits were observed on the E/A and our a/c had a few hits in the port engine nacelle and the port tyre was punctured.

The R/G was trained at No.1 A.G.S., No.11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U., and 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight

Document No. 125 (AIR 50/192/200)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Desmond George Geddes Horgan, RNZAF NZ39012
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF148 AA – R

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as destroyed

Combat report for the 27th of September 1943
Stirling “R” at a position just East of the target, after bombs had been dropped, flying at 14,000 ft. at 200 m.p.h. (I.A.S.) on a course of 298 (M)
Visibility was good although it was very dark, with a slight haze below. There were many searchlights and enemy flares were being dropped. Flak was moderate.
Our Stirling had just been coned by searchlights, and had got clear, when the R/G (Sgt. Te aika) sighted a JU.88 on the starboard fine quarter at 600 yards. As the E/A closed into attack the R/G instructed the pilot to corkscrew starboard and opened fire with a long burst. The E/A continued to close and opened fire with cannon and machine -gun, but did not hit the Stirling. The enemy closed to 50 yards, then turned over and exposed its belly, and the R/G gave him another long burst, then, with flames streaming from both engines, the E/A went down and was seen to hit the ground.

The E/A is claimed as destroyed.

The R.G. was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 125 (AIR 50/192/201 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 27th of September 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Hanover
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Iwikau Te Matauira Te Aika, RNZAF NZ425860
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF148 AA – R

Document No. 126 (AIR 50/192/202)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 4th of October 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Frankfurt
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: S/Ldr. Jack ‘Jacky’ Joll, RNZAF NZ40234
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH880 AA – J

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Thirteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with incendiary bombs of 30lb. and 4lbs. Three aircraft returned early and one failed to return. This was a good attack, ten aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Very good concentrated fires and enormous explosions being seen, the fires were still visible on the homeward journey. A.A. Fire was negligible, there were many search lights which were cooperating with enemy night-fighters. The aircraft captained by S/Ldr. J.JOLL had a combat with a M.E. 109, which was claimed as possibly damaged. The weather was poor on the outward and return journeys, but clear over the target, visibility was good except for smoke haze. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was captained by SGT. H.J. MIDDLETON.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as possibly damaged

Combat report for the 4th of October 1943
Our Stirling flying at 165 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 054(M) just leaving the target.
Our a/c was coned by searchlights, and a boozer contact was seen by the Captain, when the R/G (P/O Reid) sighted a ME.109 dead astern below at 200 yards. He instructed the pilot to corkscrew and opened fire with a long burst. The M/U gunner was also able to get in a short burst, and the E/A broke away down and was not seen again. It is claimed as possibly damaged.
Visibility at the time wa good, due to many searchlights and enemy flares, flak was moderate.

No. of rounds expended M/UG. 120
R.G. 400

Gunners trained at M/U G. 7 A.G.S., 1657 C.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flt.
R/G. 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U. and 1483(B) Gunnery Flt.

Document No. 126 (AIR 50/192/203 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 4th of October 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Frankfurt
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O William Joffre Reid, RNZAF NZ411779
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH880 AA – J

Document No. 127 (AIR 50/192/204)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 9th of October 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Alfred George Humphreys, RAAF AUS.413157
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF462 ?? – M?

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Twelve aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 1,000 lbs., 500lbs., and incendiaries of 30lbs. and 4lbs. All of the aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Results were rather disappointing as owing to thick cloud, it was not possible to assess damage. Very few fires were seen and only one large explosion was observed. Slight ineffective A.A, Fire was encountered. Searchlights were active but hampered by cloud. Several combats with enemy aircraft took place. The aircraft captained by F/SGT. SPIERS, R. claimed a M.E. 109 as probably destroyed and a M.E. 110 as damaged. Another M.E. 109 was claimed as damaged by the aircraft captained by P/O o. WHITE. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claim of probably damaged

Combat report for the 9th of October 1943
53.35 N. 08.55 E. 01.23 hrs 13,000 ft.

Our Stirling flying at 165 M.P.H. I.A.S. on a course of 302M, had left the target when the M/U gunner (Sgt. Kenefick) sighted a JU.88 at 400 yards on the port quarter level

The M/U gunner gave the order to corkscrew port and opened fire at 350 yards with a medium burst. The E/A which did not open fire, broke away down and was not seen again. Hits were observed, and it is claimed as probably damaged.
Visibility was fair, with slight haze. There was no flak or searchlight activty at the time of attack, and the I.F.F. was off.

No. of rounds expended: M/U G. 120

The M/U gunner was trained at: 7 A.G.S., 26 O.T.U., 1665 C.U., 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 127 (AIR 50/192/205 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 9th of October 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Bremen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. James Henry Kensfick, RAFVR 1623712/ 174232
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF462 ?? – M?

Document No. 128 (AIR 50/192/206)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 22nd of October 1943 – Mining in the Frisian Islands
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Colin Archibald Gunn McKenzie, RNZAF NZ417078
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF513 JN – E

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Three aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with mines of 1,500lbs., which were successfully dropped in the allotted area and the parachutes were seen to open. An uneventful trip, no A.A. Fire, searchlights or enemy aircraft being encountered. There was 6 to 7/10ths cloud in the mining area although visibility was fairly good. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made.

Combat report for the 22nd of October 1943
Our Stirling on the way to the garden when the R/G (F/O Eaves) saw an E/A carrying a bright white light in the nose, which was shaded down. The light was near dead astern at 600 yards, and the R/G opened fire with a short burst, and instructed the pilot to do a diving turn port. The E/A dived away down and was not seen again. No hits were observed.
Visibility was fair at the time, with 10/10 cloud below.

No. of rounds expended: R/G. 160

The R/G was trained at: No.1 A.G.S. No.11 O.T.U. 1651 Con Unit 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 129 (AIR 50/192/207)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 4th of November 1943 – Gardening in the Baltic
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O Eric Francis Witting, RNZAF NZ415212
Position: Pillot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EJ108 AA – O

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Four aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation, with mines of 1500lbs. This was an unfortunate night as three aircraft failed to return and the other aircraft returned early having jettisoned its mines. This aircraft met an enemy night fighter and sustained damage to the port wing, starboard flap, rear turret and many large holes in the fuselage, the rear gunner, Sgt.W. HURDIE, was killed during the combat. The weather was bad and ten tenths cloud made visibility poor. Navigation was good. The missing aircraft were Stirlings MKIII BF461, Captained by P/O.G.K.WILLIAMS, BK&&* Captained by P/O.W.S.MASTERS and XXXXX Captained by F/O. N.WILSON.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: Rear Gunner killed by cannon shell on first attack. Holes in fuselage, starboard flap shot away, port elevator practically severed.
Claim made: No claim made.

Combat report for the 4th of November 1943
57.48 N. 09.48 E. 20.00 hrs 8,000 ft.

Our Stirling at position 57.48 N. 09.48 E. returning from the garden with mines still on board was intercepted by an unseen E/A. None of the crew saw the actual a/c but the R/G was killed by the first burst of the E/A’s cannon shell. Our Stirling sustained the following damage:- Holes in fuselage, starboard flap shot away, port elevator practically severed.
When the Captain saw the E/A’s tracer he corkscrewed to starboard from his original course of 250(T). It is not certain from what position the E/A made his attack.
At the time of combat there was 6-8/10 cloud at approx. 6,000ft.

No. of rounds expended …..Nil

Document No. 130 (AIR 50/192/208)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 10th of November 1943 – Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Colin Archibald Gunn McKenzie, RNZAF NZ417078
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF514 AA – D

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Four aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with mines of 15oolbs which were successfully dropped in the allotted area and the majority of the parachutes were seen to open. No opposition was met on any part of the route. Nine tenths cloud was prevalent in the mining area, although visibility was fairly good. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: None
Claim made: No claim made.

Combat report for the 10th of November 1943
Or Stirling III “D” on route for the garden on a course of 235(M), flying below about 7 to 8/10 cloud at 4000 ft. The R/G (P/O Eaves) spotted an A/C which was identified as a JU.88 1000 yards away slightly down on the port quarter.
He reported this to the pilot who turned to port. The JU.88 came to 600 yards and the R/G opened fire. The M/U (P/O Bridge) fired at the JU.88 when the A/C was breaking away slightly down on the port beam.

The R/G noticed hits on the JU.88.
There was no Boozer contact recorded.

No. of rounds expended: R/G. 1000
M.U./G 400

The R/G was trained at: No.1 A.G.S., No.11 O.T.U., 1651 Con Unit, and 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 130 (AIR 50/192/209 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 10th of November 1943 – Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Howard Douglas Stewart Bridge, RAFVR 155028
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF514 AA – D

Document No. 130 (AIR 50/192/210 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 10th of November 1943 – Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O Ethelbert Henry Maurice Eaves, RAFVR 915615/ 121974
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF514 AA – D

Document No. 131 (AIR 50/192/211)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 18th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Alan Robert Speirs, RNZAF NZ413136
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF512 AA – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nineteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 2,000lbs and incendiaries of 30 lb and 4 lbs. Two aircraft returned early but the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Large concentrated fires and huge explosions were seen. There was a moderate heavy A.A. Barrage and searchlights were fairly active.Mant enemy aircraft were seen and two short combats took place, but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. The weather was good, being clear at the target except for slight ground haze. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.109
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 18th of November 1943
Our Stirling on course of 096(M) IAS 165 mph on the way to the target when the pilot sighted an E/A coming towards him from port bow slightly above range 300 yds. – Pilot held course and informed gunners of Fighters position. E/A passed our A/C on the port 50 yds distance level without firing. Our M/U (Sgt. Feather) saw and identified the E/A as a M.E.109 but due to technical failure his turret was unable to fire.
The R/G(F/Sgt Clift) picked up the E/A on wide port quarter following it round to fine port quarter and was able to get in two very short bursts at 100yds – 150 yds as E/A out across dead astern and broke away down to port. Hits were observed on E/A. Visibility was fair at the time with no cloud, but slight haze.
The E/A is claimed as damaged.
Boozer is not fitted to this A/C.

No of rounds expended M/U. Nil
R/G. 100 RDS

The R/G was trained at 3 B-S Canada 11 OTU. 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight 1665 CU.
The M/U was trained at 11 OTU. 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight 1665 CU.

Document No. 131 (AIR 50/192/212 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 18th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S John Edgar Clift, RNZAF NZ422690
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF512 AA – A

Document No. 131 (AIR 50/192/213 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 18th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Edgar Feather, RAFVR 1459770
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF512 AA – A

Document No. 132 (AIR 50/192/214)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 18th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. William Morton Allen, RAFVR 540956
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF507 – P

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nineteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above targets with bombs of 2,000lbs and incendiaries of 30 lb and 4 lbs. Two aircraft returned early but the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Large concentrated fires and huge explosions were seen. There was a moderate heavy A.A. Barrage and searchlights were fairly active. Many enemy aircraft were seen and two short combats took place, but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. The weather was good, being clear at the target except for slight ground haze. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made.

Combat report for the 18th of November 1943
Our Stirling over the target coned in Searchlights, with considerable flak in the immediate vicinity, was xxxxxxxx(inserted handwritten illegible) a course of 160(M).The bombs had just been released.
The M/U (Sgt. Ramsay) noticed a S/E unidentified E/A on the starboard beam up, range 600 yards. Our M/U gunner and the pilot of the E/A opened fire together as the M/U gunner gave the order to corkscrew to starboard our gunner fired a 2 second burst, did not observe any hits on the E/A, but noticed his tracer going close to it, which disappeared on the starboard beam.

At this time the R/G (Sgt. Bruce) noticed tracer coming from dead astern, but could not see any a/c. He fired a three second burst in the direction of the origin of the tracer and it stopped. Our a/c was not hit.
No boozer contacts.

No. of rounds expended R /G 250
M/U 100

The R/G was trained at 26 O.T.U. 1651 C.U., 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1651 C.U., 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 132 (AIR 50/192/215 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 18th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. W. Ramsay, RAFVR 1570005
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF507 – P

Document No. 132 (AIR 50/192/216 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 18th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Mannheim
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. C. Bruce, RAFVR 551988
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF507 – P

Document No. 133 (AIR 50/192/217)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 19th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Leverkusen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Desmond George Geddes Horgan, RNZAF NZ39012
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III LJ462 AA – O

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Sixteen aircraft were detailed to attack the above target with bombs of 2,000lbs, 1,000 lbs and incendiaries of 30 lbs and 4lbs. One aircraft failed to return, but the remainder successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. Except for one vivid red flash seen through the clouds, little results were observed. Heavy and medium A.A. Fire co-operating with Searchlights was encountered, but caused negligible damage. Some enemy aircraft were seen and a few combats took place but no damage was sustained by our aircraft. The aircraft captained be F/S R.Hunt met a J.U.88 which attacked his aircraft, the fire was returned and strikes were seen on the enemy aircraft. Our aircraft was then attacked by a FW190, the first was returned but the enemy aircraft disappeared. The weather was poor, being ten-tenths cloud over the target, there was also a fog at base which necessitated the aircraft landing at BRADWELL BAY on return. Navigation was very good. The missing aircraft was captained by F/Sgt. N. PARKER.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: FW.190 and Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Ju.88 claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 19th of November 1943
Stirling “O” returning from the target at a position 30.40 N. 06.00 E. flying at a speed of 165 (I.A.S.) at 15,000 ft. on a course of 276 (M), was intercepted by a F.190 and a JU.88.
Visibility was good with 10/10 cloud at 8-10,000 ft. below and enemy flares were being dropped ahead of our aircraft, illuminating the sky. Our Stirling was engaged by heavy flak at the time. the I.F.F. was off.

The first attack was made by the FW.190 from dead ahead slightly up at 50 yards.

The Captain (F/Sgt. Horgan) was forced to drop one wing to avoid colliding with the E/A. The E/A passed overhead to dead astern. The R/G (F/Sgt. Te Aika) engaged the E/A at 150 yeards, firing a two second burst. No hits were observed on the E/A, and it was not seen again.

Three minutes later the M/U gunner (Sgt. Cooper) reported a Ju.88 flying on the starboard beam level at 400 yards. The E/A turned in to attack our aircraft and was immediately engaged by the rear and M/U gunners, who each fired a five second burst. Hits were observed and the E/A broke off the attack and was not seen again. Our Stirling took no evasive action.
the E/A is claimed as damaged. No hits were registered on our Stirling.

No. of rounds expended: R/G 600
M/U G 200

Boozer fitted but U/S whole trip

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 133 (AIR 50/192/218 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 19th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Leverkusen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. James Henry Cooper, RAFVR 1308375
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III LJ462 AA – O

Document No. 133 (AIR 50/192/219 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 19th of November 1943 – Attack Against Targets at Leverkusen
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Iwikau Te Matauira Te Aika, RNZAF NZ425860
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III LJ462 AA – O

Document No. 134 (Not Listed in AIR Series)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 5th of January 1944 – Attack against a Special Target
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Edgar Lawrence Burke, RNZAF NZ417016
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK695 AA – N

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Ten aircraft were detailed to attack the above target with bombs of 500 lbs. All of the aircraft successfully dropped their bombs in the target area. The attack was very concentrated and appeared to be a success. Some slight heavy A.A. Fire and a few enemy aircraft were encountered but proved negligible. In spite of 3-4 10ths. cloud at the target, visibility was good. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: FW.190
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: Possible damage (hits observed)

Combat report for the 5th of January 1944
Our Stirling was intercepted by a FW.190, a few seconds after bombs had gone. Our a/c was flying at 165 mph. IAS on a true course of 174deg

The visibility was very good because of a bright moon on the starboard quarter. The IFF. Was off, searchlight activity was almost nil, but there was moderate flak.

The M/U Gunner (SGT. COOPER) first noticed the FW.190 flying without lights, about 200 – 100 yards away on port bow. The M/U/G fired a 2 sec, burst as the E/A crossed over the Stirling. He also warned the R/G (Sgt. Newnham) who fired a 2 sec. burst at the E/A as he appeared in his sights dead astern about 100 yds. up.

The E/A did not fire and disappeared dead astern slightly up. The gunners noticed hits on the E/A.
No boozer contacts.

No. of rounds expended: R/G 200
M/U/G 100

The R/G was trained at 4 A.G.S., 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., 1483(B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U ” ” ” 4 A.G.S., 11 O.T.U., 1651 C.U., 1483(B) ” ”

Document No. 135 (AIR 50/192/220)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 6th of January 1944 – Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. John Charles Lawrence Carey, RAFVR 1245811/ 172120
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF454 AA – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eight aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with mines of 1,500 lbs., which were dropped in the allotted area. This was a successful and uneventful operation, some A.A. Fire was encountered but no aircraft received any damage. A few enemy aircraft were seen, and one short combat took place and the enemy aircraft was claimed as damaged. The weather was good with no cloud and visibility was perfect. Navigation was excellent.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: None
Claim made: Claimed as damaged

Combat report for the 6th of January 1944
Our Stirling “C” was on the way to the Garden, flying at 165 mph. IAS. At 1500 feet.

The visibility was very good with no cloud and a very bright moon on the port beam.

The Rear Gunner (Sgt. Pritchard) sighted a JU 88 on the port quarter level at 2000 yards. The E/A crossed to the starbaord fine quarter and closed to 600 yards. the R/G instructed the Pilot to corkscrew starboard, and the R/G and M/U Gunner (Sgt. Hopkins) opened fire with 5 secs. burst. The E/A, whose fire was inaccurate, turned away to starboard and was not seen again. Hits were seen on the E?A, and it is claimed as damaged.

No boozer contact made.

No. of rounds expended: R/G 400
M/U/G 200

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U., 1483 Gunnery Flight
The M/U/G was trained at 11 O.T.U., 1657 C.U., 1483 Gunnery Flight

Document No. 135 (AIR 50/192/221 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 6th of January 1944 – Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. H. Pritchard, RAFVR 1259238
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF454 AA – A

Document No. 135 (AIR 50/192/222 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 6th of January 1944 – Mining in the Gironde Estuary
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. G. Hopkins, RAFVR 1046625
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Mk.III EF454 AA – A

Document No. 136 (AIR 50/192/223)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 29th of January 1944 – Mining in the Kiel Bay
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Colin Roy Baker, RNZAF NZ42999
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF512 ?? – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Nineteen aircraft were detailed to carry out the above operation with mines of 1,500 lbs. Three aircraft returned early, two dropped their mines in alternative areas, but the remainder successfully dropped their mines in the allotted area. Some light and heavy A.A. fire was encountered, and one aircraft received slight damage. A few enemy aircraft were seen and the aircraft captained by P/O C. BAKER, whilst on the homeward journey was attacked by a M.E.110, which raked our aircraft with machine gun and cannon fire, from the tailplane to the Navigator’s compartment, causing considerable damage. The mid-upper gunner, Sgt. RENWICK, H. was slightly injured and the Flight Engineer Sgt. WATSON, W. was seriously injured. On return the aircraft crash-landed at COLTISHALL. The weather was variable with 5-10/10ths cloud, but fairly clear in the mining area. Severe icing was encountered on the return journey. Navigation was very good.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Me.110
Damage to our aircraft: The port under carriage was rendered u/s, and there were many hits on the fuselage, The Mid Upper Gunner was hit in the legs, and the Engineer was hit in the abdomen. The rear turret pipes were hit and the turret and intercom were put U/S
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 29th of January 1944
Our Stirling “A” was returning from the Garden flying at 165 m.p.h. I.A.S. on a course of 251 degs. True.

The visibility was good with 10/10 cloud below and no moon.

The Rear Gunner (Sgt. Schober) sighted an Me.110 on the port quarter down at 200 yards. The E/A crossed to starboard and simulataneously the R/G and the E/A opened fire. The rear turret pipes were hit and the turret and intercom were put U/S. The R/G had no time to tell the pilot to corkscrew, but as soon as the pilot heard the gun fire and felt hits on the a/c he corkscrewed to starboard and corkscrewed into the cloud. The E/A was not seen again.

Our a/c sustained much damage, the port under carriage was rendered u/s, and there were many hits on the fuselage, The Mid Upper Gunner was hit in the legs, and the Engineer was hit in the abdomen. No claim on E/A.
No boozer contacts

No. of rounds expended: R/G 150 rounds

The R/G. was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1657 C.U. 1483 B Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 136 (AIR 50/192/224 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 29th of January 1944 – Mining in the Kiel Bay
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Ernest Schober, RCAF R.192994
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EF512 ?? – A

Document No. 137 (AIR 50/192/225)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 10th of February 1944 – Mining off La Rochelle
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/O Robert Weir Herron, RNZAF NZ425238
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE958 AA – A

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Four aircraft were detailed to lay mines of 1500 lbs off LA ROCHELLE. All completed their task apart from two mines brought back owing to mechanical failures. There was some opposition from heavy and light A.A. Fire and one aircraft had an inconclusive combat. Photographs were taken and one taken by F/Lt. J.D. GRUBB showed a sunken merchant vessel.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 10th of February 1944
Our Stirling “A” was flying at 165 I.A.S. four minutes after laying the mines at 10,000 ft., on a course of 264 degs True, in good weather, and was full moon giving good visibility. There was moderate flak on the port beam. The I.F.F. was off.

The W/Op. first saw a JU.88 on the starboard bow at a range of 600 yards. He then gave the E/A’s position to the M.U Gunner.
The E/A crossed from starboard bow to the starboard beam and thence to the starboard quarter. He then turned out to come in on a curve of pursuit attack.
By this time our Stirling was corkscrewing to starboard. The M/U Gunner (Sgt. Armstrong) fired a 6 sec burst at the Ju.88 which was now 600 yards away. No flames or ricochets were observed. The E/A did not open fire and disappeared starboard quarter down.

The R/G (P/O Chilman) who had been carrying out his search on the port side also fired a 2 sec burst, but did not observe any ricochets on the E/A.

No boozer fitted.

No. of rounds expended: M/U/G 250
R/G 150

The R/G was trained at 7 A.G.S. 1657 C.U. 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.
The M/U/G was trained at 11 A.G.S. 1657 C.U. 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight.

Document No. 137 (AIR 50/192/226 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 10th of February 1944 – Mining off La Rochelle
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: P/O Peter Ernest Chilman, RAFVR 155992
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EE958 AA – A

Document No. 138 (AIR 50/192/227)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1944 – Mining in Baltic Sea
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S Geoffrey Warren Rowberry, RNZAF NZ414567
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK695 AA – X

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Fifteen aircraft were detailed to lay mines of 1500 lbs, south of Zealand, an island in the Baltic Sea. Thirteen aircraft completed their mission successfully. The weather was good with excellent visibility. One aircraft (Captain NZ421803 F/Sgt. Willis W.) encountered six JU.88s, four of which fired short bursts, our rear gunner and mid-upper gunner returning fire. Our aircraft was not damaged and no claims were made on the enemy aircraft. Two aircraft returned early with engine trouble.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Unknown E/A
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 26th of February 1944
Our Stirling “X” with mines laid, was on the way home flying at 200 m.p.h. (True) on a course of 246 degs (true).

The visibility was fair with haze, and there was no moon. The I.F.F. was off and there was no flak or searchlights activity at the time.

A boozer contact had been made, and our a/c was corkscrewing, the boozer light went out and our a/c had just levelled out when the rear Gunner (Sgt. Schrober) saw trace coming from the starboard fine quarter. He told the pilot to corkscrew starboard and opened fire with four two second bursts. The E/A fired four bursts of cannon and machine gun, but all fell short of our a/c. The Mid Upper Gunner (Sgt. Davies) was searching the other part of the sky. No hits were made on out a/c and the E/A was not seen at all due to the haze. No further fire was seen from the E/A.

No. of rounds expended: R/G 800

The R/G was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1657 CU 1483 B Gunnery Flight
The M/U/G was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1657 CU 1483 B Gunnery Flight

Document No. 138 (AIR 50/192/228 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1944 – Mining in Baltic Sea
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Raymond David Davies, RAFVR 1317623
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK695 AA – X

Document No. 138 (AIR 50/192/229 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1944 – Mining in Baltic Sea
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Ernest Schroher, RCAF R.192994
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III BK695 AA – X

Document No. 139 (AIR 50/192/230)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1944 – Mining in Baltic Sea
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/S William Jarvis Willis, RNZAF NZ421803
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH949 JN – R

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Multiple Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 26th of February 1944
Our Stirling “R” with mines laid was returning home flying at 170 m.p.h. IAS and on a course of 245 degs. True.

The visibility was quite good, but there was no moon. The I.F.F. was off. There was no flak and no searchlights.

The pilot noticed a JU 88 dead ahead, range about 150 yds. and he had to climb to avoid collision with E/A. Whilst still climbing the Pilot and Mid Upper Gunner both spotted five more JU 88 pass over the top of our a/c., range about 200 yds. crossing from fine starboard bow to port fine quarter. As the E/A passed our A/C four of the JU88 gave very short bursts at our a/c.

The first one with cannon and machine gun fire, and the rest fired very short bursts from the beam with M/G fire.

The E/A disappeared very quickly and our Gunners only had time to give very short bursts. We did not observe any ricochets on the E/A and our bomber was not hit.

There were no boozer contacts.

No. of rounds expended: R/G 60
M/U/G 100
The R/G Sgt. Reid was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1651 C.U. 1483 B Gunnery Flight
The M/U/G Sgt. Ferguson was trained at 11 O.T.U. 1651 C.U. 1483 B Gunnery Flight

Document No. 139 (AIR 50/192/231 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1944 – Mining in Baltic Sea
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. Allister Archibald Ferguson, RNZAF NZ425391
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH949 JN – R

Document No. 139 (AIR 50/192/232 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 26th of February 1944 – Mining in Baltic Sea
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: Sgt. William Ferguson Reid, RCAF R.178421/ J.89732
Position: Rear Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Stirling Mk.III EH949 JN – R

Document No. 140 (AIR 50/192/233)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 9th of April 1944 – Attack against Villeneuve St. George
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: F/Lt. Eric Francis Witting, RNZAF NZ415212
Position: Pilot
Aircraft involved in report: Lancaster Mk.I ND752 AA – O

Form 541 diary report for Operation.
Eleven Lancaster aircraft successfully attacked Villeneuve St. Georges. Four Stirling aircraft were detailed to attack Lille. One jettisoned its load on the outward journey, but the remainder successfully attacked the target.

Summary of Combat Report:
Enemy aircraft involved: Ju.88
Damage to our aircraft: none
Claim made: No claim made

Combat report for the 9th of April 1944
The Lancaster was approaching the target ten minutes prior to bombing at a speed of 165 I.A.S. at 14,000 ft on a course of 035(T) at 23.44 hrs.

The weather was good and a full moon dead astern gave excellent visibility. There was no flak and there were no searchlights in the immediate vicinity. The I.F.F. was off.

An E/A was first sighted by the R/G(F/O Eaves) in the starboard quarter down 20 degs at a range of 600 yards. It was a FW.190.
The M/U gunner (W/O Wiggins D.F.M.) concentrated his search on the beams for other E/A. When the E/A closed to 400 yards, corkscrew action to starboard was taken, but fire was held until the breakaway to port up as five other Lancasters could be seen astern at 1,000 to 1,200 yards behind the E/A.

A short two second burst was fired by both gunners, but no hits were observed. The E/A levelled off and disappeared on the port beam not having opened fire.

No. of rounds expended R/G 150
M/U/G 50

The R/G was trained at: 1 A.G.S., 1651 C.U., 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight
The M/U was trained at: 8 A.G.S., 1651 C.U., 1483 (B) Gunnery Flight

Document No. 140 (AIR 50/192/234 – AS ABOVE)
Date of Report: Not recorded
Date of Combat: 9th of April 1944 – Attack against Villeneuve St. George
Name of Airman that Combat Report is filed against: W/O W. Wiggins, RAFVR 1890609
Position: Mid Upper Gunner
Aircraft involved in report: Lancaster Mk.I ND752 AA – O

The following reports are of a different format, making far more use of set questions and responses. The level of completion of these reports is also quite variable. For ease reading and particularly to distinguish between the contents of the standard form and combat commentary, The proforma document will be in a dark grey, the combat specific information in black. As with the transcription of the previous reports, in places the text is difficult or unreadable. Where an educated guess has been made it is followed by a “?” and if the text is utterly illegible its presence on the form is marked “XXXXXXX”

Document No. 141 – 142 (AIR50/192/235)
Op Details: Attack Against Dusseldorf 22nd of April 1944
Pilot of aircraft: P/O Ronald ‘Joe’ Hunt, RAFVR 1126956/ 173363
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND747 AA – T
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. Jack Manns, RAFVR 1580583 – Rear Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 22nd of April 1944 Attack Against Dusseldorf
Eight Lancaster aircraft took part in a concentrated attack against Dusseldorf.

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   22/23 April 1944   Target   Dusseldorf   Group   3   Sqdn   75       A/C Letter     AA/T
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc III   Serial No.   ND747
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried?
Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     –
4. Time   01.28? Height   20000   Heading   017 (T)
5. Position (Lat & Long)    –     Target Area Outward/ Target Area/ Homeward
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc   Hazy, no cloud, no moon, vis quite good
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack      Held by two s/l’s. No flak, no flares
8. What was first warning? VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say   which equipment if more than one.
9. What was the immediate action taken?   R/G fired at E/A
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?
No
11. First visual range    600   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down     astern
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?   R/G
13. E/A Type     FW.190     No.     one   Formation
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     No
25. Direction of attack or approach…….E/A passing Port XXX to starboard XXXX
16. Direction of Breakaway     Starboard xxx     Range     xxx yards
17. What combat manoeuvre taken   Lanc was corkscrewing to port     Range
18. Did the fighter fire?     No   Opening Range       Closing Range
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds   400   Opening Range   600     Stoppages   No
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds Opening Range   Stoppages
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   No Stoppages
25. Damage to Bomber   No
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   Nil
28. Rear Gunner                        F/S Manns           Mid Upper            Under
29. Where Trained?                   3 (CAN)   A.G.S.     A.G.S.   A.G.S.
                      – O.T.U.            O.T.U.        O.T.U.
                                           1665   H.C.U.                         H.C.U.         H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?
31. Loss of height during encounter   none
32. Was under-gun position manned?   No U/G position
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   M/U
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   Nil

NARRATIVE
In the case of attacks ie cases which the enemy aircraft opened fire, and other combats involving claims of enemy aircraft destroyed a narrative giving the proper time sequence of all events must be added It should include all features of general interest not covered by the above questionnaire.

This E/A may or may not have intended to attack bomber.

Document No. 143 – 144 Pages (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Karlsruhe 24th of April 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/S John Carter Bateman, RAAF AUS.421308
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I LL865 AA – ?
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. Thomas ‘Tommy’ Farrow, RAFVR – Rear Gunner. Sgt. Terence John ‘Terry’ Hopkins, RAFVR 1603793 – Mid Upper Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 24th of April 1944 Attack Against Karlsruhe
Sixteen aircraft were detailed to attack Karlsruhe. One was withdrawn but the remainder carried out a successful attack with little opposition.

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   24/25 April 1944   Target   Karlsruhe   Group   3   Sqdn   75 NZ       A/C Letter     AA/?
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc I   Serial No.   LL865
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat    None
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     –
4. Time   23:57?   Height   17,000   Heading   XXXX
5. Position (Lat & Long)       XXXXX           Outward Target Area Home
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc
Fairly good vis. No moon
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack
No s/l’s Med flak 10 miles away on port beam
8. What was first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.
9. What was the immediate action taken?   Immediate corkscrew
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?
N/A
11. First visual range       400?   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?     M/U
13. E/A Type     Me.109     No.    one   Formation
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     No
25. Direction of attack or approach         xxxx over to starboard quarter up
16. Direction of Breakaway     xxxxxx     Range     600
17. What combat manoeuvre taken   Corkscrew     Range   400
18. Did the fighter fire?     No   Opening Range       Closing Range
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds     150     Opening Range   400    Stoppages
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   yes?
25. Damage to Bomber   Nil
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter
28. Rear Gunner             Sgt. Farrow           Mid Upper     Sgt. Hopkins       Under
29. Where Trained?       10   A.G.S.                                    1   A.G.S.                                   A.G.S.
                  11 O.T.U.                                        11   O.T.U.        O.T.U.
         1657   H.C.U.                                   1657   H.C.U.      H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?    5 miles North of track
31. Loss of height during encounter   1,000 ft.
32. Was under-gun position manned?   No
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   R/G
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   None

NARRATIVE
In the case of attacks ie cases which the enemy aircraft opened fire, and other combats involving claims of enemy aircraft destroyed a narrative giving the proper time sequence of all events must be added It should include all features of general interest not covered by the above questionnaire.

Fighter attacked 1 1/2 mins after appeared near a/c. This time from Stbd. Quarter up definitely attacking Lancaster. Both gunners fired when 109 attacked and seen to break away. 109 did not fire.

Document No. 145 – 146 (AIR50/192/236)
Op Details: Attack Against Essen 26th of April 1944
Pilot of aircraft: P/O Cecil Ernest ‘Snow’ Armstrong, RNZAF NZ42354
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND768 AA – F
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. James Pepper, RAFVR 1682572 – Rear Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 26th of April 1944 Attack Against Essen
Fifteen aircraft (Lancasters) were detailed to attack Essen. Two were withdrawn, but the remaining thirteen took part in a successful and very concentrated attack. The defences were considered to be moderate and all the aircraft returned safely.

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   26/ 27 April 1944   Target   Essen   Group   3   Sqdn   75 NZ       A/C Letter     AA/F
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc III   Serial No.   ND768
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     Trained
4. Time   00.50 to 01.00? Height   19,000   Heading   05515N XXXXX
5. Position (Lat & Long) (2 illegible sets of bearing relating to two contacts with E/A) Outward Target Area Home
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc      Very good vis for first encounter moon astern. Fairly good vis for second encounter with no moon.
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack     None for first attack. Concentrated S/L and xxx flak prior to 2nd encounter
8. What was first warning? VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.
9. What was the immediate action taken?   Corkscrew Corkscrew
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later? No
11. First visual range   1200 yds   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down     800 port beam xxxx level
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?     R/G
13. E/A Type     210     No.     one   Formation
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     Ju.88 lights on wing tip?    No lights on 210
25. Direction of attack or approach…….Port xxx qtr.   (Second direction illegible)
16. Direction of Breakaway     down?      Xxxx xxxx xxx xxx       Range
17. What combat manoeuvre taken   Corkscrew     Range
18. Did the fighter fire?     No   Opening Range   700   700   Closing Range   700   700?
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds   500   Opening Range   600     Stoppages   xxxx jammed xxxx
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds     Opening Range       Stoppages
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   Yes
25. Damage to Bomber   Nil
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   –
28. Rear Gunner                Sgt. Pepper           Mid Upper             Under
29. Where Trained?           6   A.G.S.                A.G.S.                      A.G.S.
               26   O.T.U.                O.T.U.                     O.T.U.
         1657   H.C.U.               H.C.U.                     H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?
31. Loss of height during encounter   2,000 ft.
32. Was under-gun position manned?   No under gun
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   M/U
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   None

–

Document No. 147 – 148 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Friedrichshafen 27th of April 1944
Pilot of aircraft: P/O Edgar Lawrence Burke, RNZAF NZ417016
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND802 JN – D “The Flying Scotsman”
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Donald Cameron Kitchener Grant, RAFVR 527237 – Rear Gunner. Sgt. James Henry Cooper, RAFVR 1308375 – Mid Upper Gunner

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   27/28th April ’44   Target   Friedrichshafen Group   3   Sqdn   75(NZ)       A/C Letter     JN/D
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc III   Serial No.   ND802
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat         Serviceable
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     Trained
4. Time   02.13 Height   16,500   Heading   –
5. Position (Lat & Long) Target Area    Outward/ Target Area/ Home
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc      Good Clear Vis.
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack    No flak no S/L Fighter Flares
8. What was first warning? VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.
9. What was the immediate action taken?   Corkscrewed
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?     No
11. First visual range    1000 yards   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?     R/G
13. E/A Type     Unidentified     No.       one   Formation       –
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     Nav. Lights on
25. Direction of attack or approach        Starboard quarter down
16. Direction of Breakaway     Port quarter down     Range     400 yards
17. What combat manoeuvre taken   Corkscrew     Range   600 yards
18. Did the fighter fire?     No   Opening Range       Closing Range
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds   500   Opening Range   500    Stoppages   nil
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds   did not fire   Opening Range       Stoppages
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   –
25. Damage to Bomber   Nil
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   Nil
28. Rear Gunner                F/S Grant           Mid Upper           Sgt. Cooper           Under
29. Where Trained?           9/8?   A.G.S.                                     9   A.G.S.                            A.G.S.
                                                26   O.T.U. 11   O.T.U.                            O.T.U.
        1657   H.C.U.                             1651   H.C.U.      H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?
On track
31. Loss of height during encounter   1,000 ft.
32. Was under-gun position manned?   No
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   M/U nil
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   None

Document No. 149 – 150 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Friedrichshafen 27th of April 1944
Pilot of aircraft: P/O John Francis Schofield ‘Johnny’ Wainwright, RAFVR 172615/ 1320248
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I RS692 JN – P
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. Stanley ‘Stan’ Starling, RAFVR 1295007 – Rear Gunner

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   27/28th April ’44   Target   Friedrichshafen Group   3   Sqdn   75(NZ)       A/C Letter     AA/P
2. A/C Type and Mark Lancaster III   Serial No.   RS692
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat         Serviceable
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     XXXXXXXX
4. Time   xxxxxxxx   Height   19,000? Heading   xxx(T)
5. Position (Lat & Long)    XXXXX      Outward Target Area Home
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc        No Cloud     port quarter Good visibility
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack         Nil
8. What was first warning?    VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.
9. What was the immediate action taken?   Order given to corkscrew port
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?     No
11. First visual range       600 yards?   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?     Rear Gunner
13. E/A Type     FW.190     No.   one   Formation       –
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     No
25. Direction of attack or approach       port quarter up
16. Direction of Breakaway     port quarter up     Range     50 yards ?
17. What combat manoeuvre taken   Corkscrew     Range   400 yards
18. Did the fighter fire?     No   Opening Range       Closing Range
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds   300?   Opening Range   400 yds?    Stoppages   nil
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds     Opening Range       Stoppages
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   n/a
25. Damage to Bomber   Nil
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   Nil
28. Rear Gunner                   Sgt. Starling           Mid Upper             Under
29. Where Trained? 11   A.G.S.         A.G.S.               A.G.S.
               18   O.T.U.       O.T.U.         O.T.U.
        1657   H.C.U.       H.C.U.       H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?
31. Loss of height during encounter   no loss?
32. Was under-gun position manned?
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   M/U nil
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   Nil

NARRATIVE
In the case of attacks ie cases which the enemy aircraft opened fire, and other combats involving claims of enemy aircraft destroyed a narrative giving the proper time sequence of all events must be added It should include all features of general interest not covered by the above questionnaire.

Document No. 151 – 152 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Friedrichshafen 27th of April 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/L Eric Francis Witting, RNZAF NZ415212
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I ME691 AA – R
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Joseph William Collins, RNZAF NZ424969 – Rear Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 27th of April 1944 Attack Against Friedrichshafen
Sixteen Lancasters were detailed to attack Friedrichshafen. Fourteen successfully carried out their mission, one aircraft bombed a decoy in error and another failed to return (Captain NZ42282 F/O. R. Herron).

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   27/ 28 April 44   Target   Friedrichshafen Group   3   Sqdn   75(NZ)       A/C Letter     AA/R
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lancaster I   Serial No.   ME691
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat        Nil
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     N/A
4. Time   xxxxxxxx   Height 19,0000 ft.   Heading   xxx(T)
5. Position (Lat & Long)         XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX         Outward Target Area Home
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc      Slight haze 1st Quarter on port quarter   good visibility
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack       Nil
8. What was first warning? VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.            following bomber down in flames
9. What was the immediate action taken?   Corkscrew port and open fire
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?     No
11. First visual range       600 yards   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down
12. Which member of the crew obtained first visual?     M/U
13. E/A Type     S/E E/A     No.    one   Formation       –
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     No
25. Direction of attack or approach.        From Astern
16. Direction of Breakaway     Lost to xxxxxxxxxxxx?     Range
17. What combat manoeuvre taken   Corkscrew Port     Range   600 yards
18. Did the fighter fire?     No   Opening Range   –   Closing Range   –
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds   50   Opening Range   600 yds.     Stoppages   1
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds     Opening Range       Stoppages
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   Yes
25. Damage to Bomber   Nil
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   Nil
28. Rear Gunner                       F/S Collins          Mid Upper             Under
29. Where Trained?                 3 B & G School Canada A.G.S.                         A.G.S.                A.G.S.
            11   O.T.U.                                                             O.T.U.         O.T.U.
                                               1665   H.C.U.                                                              H.C.U.               H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?
31. Loss of height during encounter   500 feet
32. Was under-gun position manned?   –
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   M/G NIl
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   Nil

Document No. 153 – 154 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Friedrichshafen 27th of April 1944
Pilot of aircraft: P/O Ronald ‘Joe’ Hunt, RAFVR 1126956/ 173363
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND747 AA – T
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Clifford Billington, RAFVR 539902 – Mid Upper Gunner

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   27/ 28 April 44   Target   Friedrichshafen Group   3   Sqdn   75(NZ)       A/C Letter     AA/T
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lancaster III   Serial No.   ND747
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat         serviceable
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?
4. Time   00.45? Height   10,000 ft. ?   Heading   060?(T)
5. Position (Lat & Long)       XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX      Outward Target Area Home
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc.     Nil   Port Quarter level? Good
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack      Nil
8. What was first warning? VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.
9. What was the immediate action taken?   Corkscrew port
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?     Yes
11. First visual range       xxx yds   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down     Starboard bow up
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?     Mid Upper
13. E/A Type     Me.109?     No.       one   Formation       –
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     No
25. Direction of attack or approach        From Starboard bow
16. Direction of Breakaway     Port Quarter Above?     Range     200 yds. ?
17. What combat manoeuvre taken   Corkscrew Port     Range   600 yds.
18. Did the fighter fire?     No   Opening Range       Closing Range
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds   Nil   Opening Range         Stoppages
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds   50   Opening Range   600 yds.   Stoppages   Nil
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   –
25. Damage to Bomber   Nil
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   Nil
28.                                  Rear Gunner    Mid Upper     F/S Billington       Under
29. Where Trained?    A.G.S.                                        1 A.G.S.                              A.G.S.
             O.T.U.      11 O.T.U.           O.T.U.
                  H.C.U.      16xx    H.C.U.                             H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?
31. Loss of height during encounter   xxx ft.
32. Was under-gun position manned?   –
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   R/G   Nil
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   Nil

Document No. 155 – 156 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Chambly 1st of May 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/S Colin Arthur ‘Lucky’ Megson, RNZAF NZ416519
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND908 JN – M
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Thomas Edward Rowe, RNZAF NZ40437 – Rear Gunner. Sgt. Frank Ball, RAFVR – Mid Upper Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 1st of May 1944 Attack Against Chambly
Sixteen aircraft were detailed to attack the marshalling yards at Chambly. Fifteen of these successfully attacked in clear weather, bombing being accurate. Two brief encounters with enemy aircraft took place and resulted in one being possibly damaged. One of our aircraft (Captain NZ41362 F/L. A/S/L. E.W. Sachtler) failed to return.

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   1/2 May 1944   Target   Chambly   Group   3   Sqdn   75(NZ)       A/C Letter    JN/M
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lancaster III   Serial No.   ND908
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?
4. Time   00.36 Height   10,000 ft.   Heading   334(T)
5. Position (Lat & Long)     4909N 0201E      Outward Target Area Home
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc     Good vis. slight haze moon ahead
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack     No S/L no flares no flak
8. What was first warning?     VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.
9. What was the immediate action taken?   Corkscrew to starboard
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?     No
11. First visual range       1000 yards   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?     R/G
13. E/A Type     Do.217     No.       one   Formation       –
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     No
25. Direction of attack or approach        Starboard quarter up
16. Direction of Breakaway     Port quarter up     Range     400 yards
17. What combat manoeuvre taken   Corkscrew     Range   600 yards
18. Did the fighter fire?     No   Opening Range       Closing Range
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds   70   Opening Range   600     Stoppages   Nil
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds   40   Opening Range   600   Stoppages   Nil
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds       Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   –
25. Damage to Bomber   Nil
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   Nil
28. Rear Gunner   F/S Rowe           Mid Upper    Sgt. Ball      Under
29. Where Trained?                   3 B.G. (Can.)                   A.G.S.                    A.G.S.
11   O.T.U.      O.T.U.        O.T.U.
1657   H.C.U.         H.C.U.         H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?
31. Loss of height during encounter   1000 ft.
32. Was under-gun position manned?   No under gun position
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   W/Op in astrodome       Nil
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   Nil

Document No. 157 – 158 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Louvain 11th of May 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/L Sidney Alfred Clark, RNZAF NZ414591
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND917 J
Details of crew listed in report: F/S James Arthur Trott, RNZAF NZ42343 – Rear Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 11th of May 1944 Attack Against Louvain
Twenty-four aircraft, representing the largest number of Lancaster aircraft so far detailed by this Squadron, were dispatched to attack the marshalling yards at Louvain. Twenty-three aircraft successfully attacked in good weather. One aircraft (Captain NZ414591 A/F/L. S. Clark) claimed a JU 88 destroyed in combat over the North Sea. Another aircraft (Captain 151118 A/F/L. D. Warren) failed to return.

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date   11/112th May 1944   Target   Louvain   Group   3   Sqdn   75 NZ       A
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc III   Serial No.   ND917
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?
4. Time   00.54 Height    12,500   Heading   310(M)
5. Position (Lat & Long)       51 30 N 03 00 E?      Outward/ Target Area/ Home
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc     Clear, vis poor, slight haze below
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack     No flak, no S/L’s scattered flares on Port Down
8. What was first warning?     VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.
9. What was the immediate action taken?   Dive to port
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?      No
11. First visual range    300 yds     Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?
13. E/A Type     JU 88     No.       one   Formation       –
14. Did the E/A carry lights?     No
25. Direction of attack or approach        xxxx
16. Direction of Breakaway     Port Up     Range     100 yds
17. What combat manoeuvre taken         Range
18. Did the fighter fire?     Yes   Opening Range   300   Closing Range   50 yds
19. Rear Gunner. Rounds   1000   Opening Range   300     Stoppages   Nil
20. M/U Gunner. Rounds     Opening Range       Stoppages
21. Under Gunner.   Rounds      Opening Range         Stoppages
22. Front Gunner. Rounds       Opening Range       Stoppages
23. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
24. Were you able to clear stoppages   –
25. Damage to Bomber   M/U turret U/S   XXX XXXX Elevator XXX Port Flap XXXX XXXX and damage by fire in fuselage extinguished by M/U
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   Destroyed
28.                         Rear Gunner   F/S Trott          Mid Upper             Under
29. Where Trained?                     3 B.G. (Can.)   A.G.S.        A.G.S.                     A.G.S.
               11   O.T.U.                          O.T.U.                    O.T.U.
         1665   H.C.U.           H.C.U.    H.C.U.
30. Bomber off track/ on track/ returning early when combat occurred?
31. Loss of height during encounter   500 ft.
32. Was under-gun position manned?   No under gun
33. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky? Type of second enemy a/c seen   M/U
34. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   Nil

JU 88 and Lanc opened fire together. Fighter stopped almost immediately but R/G fired at fighter all the time from 300 yds. Range till the breakaway. The fighter was observed to develop a fire in the starboard engine. He turned on his back and went down, an explosion was noticed on the water and a fire followed. The fighter’s first burst rendered the intercom U/S and so the R/G did not give combat manoeuvre, but fired all the time.

Document No. 159 – 160 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Homberg 20th of July 1944
Pilot of aircraft: S/L Lindsay Johnson Drummond, RNZAF NZ413043
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I HK568 AA – K
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Gordon Ross Ellis, RCAF J.89174 – Mid Upper Gunner. F/O William Henry Cotterill, RAFVR 51720 – Rear Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 20th of July 1944 Attack Against Homberg
Twenty six aircraft took off, as detailed, to attack the oil refinery at Homberg. Nineteen aircraft were successful in bombing the target, with the aid of markers, which seemed well concentrated. Two good explosions were seen and smoke came up from the target area. Heavy A.A. fire was moderate, but fighters were very active, eight combats taking place. Seven aircraft failed to return, the captains were AUS22776 W/O. Gilmour, H., NZ428819 F/S. Howell, E., NZ421829 F/S. Mackay, K., NZ422057 F/S. Davidson, N., NZ42488 W/O. Whittington, H., NZ413219 F/S. Roche, G. & NZ414560 P/O. Burtt, H.

COMBAT REPORT PROFORMA
1. Date 20/ 21 July 1944   Target   Homberg   Group   3   Sqdn   75(NZ)       A/C Letter     AA/ K
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc I   Serial No.   HK568
3.What Special Equipment (i.e Boozer I, Boozer III AURAL MONICA, VISUAL MONICA, FISHPOND A.I. IV, A.I. V/ A.G.L.T) was carried? Say whether serviceable, U/S or not used at the time of combat         No Special Equipment
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?    N/A
4. Time   01.33 Height   14,000 ft.   Heading   280?    Position (Lat & Long)       51:30 N 06:00 E    5. Outward/ Target Area / Homeward       On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather Cloud, Moon and position in relation to Bomber, Visibility etc     No Moon Hazy slight cloud below.
7. Searchlights, flares flak etc. prior to or during attack     F/ Flares
8. What was first warning? VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT – Say which equipment if more than one.
9. Which equipment warned? Visual immediate action taken?   Corkscrew
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later?       N/A
11. First visual range       500   Port/ astern/ starboard/ bean/ quarter astern/ up/ level/ down
12.Which member of the crew obtained first visual?     R/G
13. E/A Type     Me.410     No.       one   Formation       –       What lights on E/A      Nil
14. Direction of attack or approach             Starboard Quarter above
15. Direction of Breakaway   of E/A Starboard Port Down     Range     150 yds.
16. What combat manoeuvre taken   Corkscrew Stbd.     Range
17. Did the fighter fire?    No   Opening Range   –   Closing Range   –

18. Who opened fire first ? FIGHTER/ REAR GUNNER/ M/U GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
REAR GUNNER                                          M.U. GUNNER
Name                        F/O Cotterell                                           F/S Ellis
Rounds fired              1,000                                                          500
Opening range          400 yds                                                   400 yds
Closing range      150 yds                                                   150 yds
Stoppages                  Seven overfeed 2 XXX XXXXX?          NIL
Training A.G.S.                                                                               3 B & G School Canada
O.T.U. & H.C.U.         XX O.T.U Lossiemouth                              26 O.T.U.    1657 H.C.U.
20. Were you able to clear stoppages   on one gun?
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack, or in the dark part of the sky?     M/U   Other a/c seen   Nil
22. Loss of height during encounter   1,000 ft.
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat?   Nil
25. Damage to Bomber   Nil
26. Casualties to Crew   Nil
27. Damage to Fighter   Port wing and port side of fuselage
27. Fighter claimed Destroyed/ Probably Destroyed/ Damaged
NARRATIVE
In the case of attacks ie cases which the enemy aircraft opened fire, and other combats involving claims of enemy aircraft destroyed a narrative giving the proper time sequence of all events must be added It should include all features of general interest not covered by the above questionnaire.

Enemy aircraft ME.410 was seen by Rear Gunner positioning itself for attack on starboard quarter above range 500 yards.
Rear Gunner ordered Pilot to corkscrew to starboard, enemy aircraft closed to 400 yards, R/G and M/U opened fire simultaneously at 400 yards. Hits were seen on port wing and fuselage by both gunners and Engineer, enemy aircraft was seen to fall away at 50 yards to the starboard beam down, disappearing behind cloud. No more attacks developed.

Document No. 161 – 162 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Stuttgart 25th of July 1944
Pilot of aircraft: P/O Frank Ernest Scott, RNZAF NZ415427
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND917 JN – O
Details of crew listed in report: F/O Douglas Flockhart Archer, RCAF – – Air Bomber

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 25th of July 1944 Attack Against Stuttgart
Fourteen aircraft took off to attack Stuttgart, only ten however, were successful, and they reported a concentrated raid to be developing, with many fires and explosions. Heavy A.A. fire was only slight in the target area, but enemy fighters were again active. Two aircraft had combats and one, captained by NZ425948 F/S. Smith, M. claimed a FW190 destroyed. On return two aircraft landed at Ford, one due to engine trouble and the other owing to damage to the petrol tank and rear turret by heavy A.A. fire. Of the four abortive sorties, one aircraft jettisoned after its starboard inner engine had caught fire when in combat, another failed to see any markers when over the target, and brought its bombs back, and the other two returned early owing to severe icing.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   26th July 1944   Target   Stuttgart   Group   3   Squadron   75 NZ
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lancaster III   A/C Letter & Serial No.
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     .
Say whether serviceable, u/s, or not used at time of combat Unserviceable
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?
4. Time   04.58 Height   9,000 ft.   Heading   350 (T)   Position (Lat & Long) 4735N 0120 E.
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD          On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       Cloud 5/10 at 10,000 ft. Dawn Vis. – 4 to 5 miles
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     Nil
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
9. Which equipment warned?   Nil   Immediate action taken?   Corkscrew
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   No
11. First Visual;   range     500    yds; position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;    against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       –
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     B/A
13. Type of E.A.     JU.88   No.   One     What lights on E/A     Nil
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Starboard Quarter Down
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Port       Range     200 yds.
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Starboard
17. Did the fighter fire?   No   Opening range   –     Closing range   –
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.               REAR GUNNER       M.U. GUNNER     UNDER GUNNER     FRONT GUNNER
Name             F/O D.F. Archer
Rounds fired        200
Opening range 400 yds.
Closing range      200 yds.
Stoppages      Nil
Training   A.G.S.   Moosebank, Manitoba, Canada, No.2 B & A.G
O.T.U. & H.C.U.   12 Chipping Warden and 1676 Con Unit

20. Were you able to clear stoppage?   –
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?    Mid Upper     Other a/c seen     Nil
22. Loss of height during the attack     Nil
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     –
24. Damage to bomber       Nil
Casualties to crew     Nil
26. Damage to fighter     Hits observed – fuselage and engines
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made
The Bomb Aimer (F/O. Archer) who was flying in the Rear Turret observed a JU.88 at 500 yds. Starboard quarter down, and immediately gave the order to corkscrew starboard at the same time opening fire. Hits were seen to enter the enemy aircraft, which appeared to fall for a while out of control. The Bomb Aimer claims to have damaged this Fighter.

The Bomb Aimer (F/O. Archer) who was flying in the Rear Turret observed a JU.88 at 500 yds. Starboard quarter down, and immediately gave the order to corkscrew starboard at the same time opening fire. Hits were seen to enter the enemy aircraft, which appeared to fall for a while out of control. The Bomb Aimer claims to have damaged this Fighter

Document No. 163 – 164 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Lucheux 8th of August 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/O Thomas Christie Waugh, RAFVR 159174
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND801 JN – X :Get Sum Inn”
Details of crew listed in report: F/S James Baird Nickels, RNZAF NZ425852 – Mid Upper Gunner
, –

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 8th of August 1944 Attack Against Lucheux
Twenty aircraft took off as detailed to attack Petrol Dumps at Lucheux, behind the enemy lines. All aircraft were successful in their mission, in good visibility. A good concentration of fires with smoke rising to 9,000 ft., was left burning. There was only slight A.A. opposition, but enemy fighters were active, and three of our aircraft had inconclusive combats, two suffering damage but no casualties.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   8/9 August 1944   Target   Lucheux   Group   3   Squadron   75 (NZ)
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lancaster III   A/C Letter & Serial No.   JN/X (ND801
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     .
Say whether serviceable, u/s, or not used at time of combat     Serviceable
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?
4. Time   23.51 Height   12,000 ft.   Heading   120 (T)   Position (Lat & Long) Target
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD      On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       Good
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     At time of combat aircraft was xxx xxx Flak
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
9. Which equipment warned?   No   Immediate action taken?   Corkscrew starboard
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   No
11. First Visual;   range     300    yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;   against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     Mid Upper Gunner
13. Type of E.A.     JU.88   No.   One     What lights on E/A     No
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Starboard Quarter
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Starboard Beam Up       Range    300 yds.
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Starboard
17. Did the fighter fire?   Yes   Opening range   400 yds.     Closing range   300 yds.
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.                REAR GUNNER       M.U. GUNNER    UNDER GUNNER     FRONT GUNNER
Name                  F/Sgt Nickels
Rounds fired                                80
Opening range                            350 yds.
Closing range                              300 yds.
Stoppages                                    No
Training A.G.S.    3. B.G.
O.T.U. & H.C.U.                           11   1651
20. Were you able to cleaar stoppage?   –
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?   Rear Gunner    Other a/c seen     Lanc. Coned on Starboard Beam
22. Loss of height during the attack     Nil
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     –
24. Damage to bomber       M/G Holes in tail rudder plane
Casualties to crew   Nil
26. Dmage to fighter     Nil
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABBLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED     No Claim

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made.

Document No. 165 – 166 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Stettin 16th Of August 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/O John Rees Layton, RNZAF NZ425914
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III ND782 AA – U
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Leslie Dixon Moore, RNZAF NZ421327 – Rear Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 16th Of August 1944 Attack Against Stettin
Twenty three aircraft took off as detailed to attack Stettin. Twenty two were successful in attacking the target with the aid of markers, but the raid appeared scattered and no great concentration of fires was achieved. Slight A.A. fire was encountered in the target area and a few fighters were met en route, two aircraft having inconclusive combats. One aircraft returned early with icing trouble.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   16/ 17 Aug ’44   Target   Stettin   Group   3   Squadron 75/NZ
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc III   A/C Letter & Serial No.   AA/U
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     .
Say whether servicable, u/s, or not used at time of combat Servicable     Not used at time
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     Untrained
4. Time   xx.17? Height   6000? Heading   xxx   Position (Lat & Long)   xxxxx
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD       On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       Vis. poor hazy xxxx above
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     Fighter flare prior to combat on Stbd beam
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
9. Which equipment warned?   –    Immediate action taken?   Corkscrewed and opened fire
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   –
11. First Visual;   range     300 yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;    against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       N/A
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     M/G
13. Type of E.A.     JU.88   No.   One     What lights on E/A     Nil
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     xxxx xxxx xxx xxxx         Range     xxxx
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew to port
17. Did the fighter fire?   No   Opening range         Closing range
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.                        REAR GUNNER       M.U. GUNNER     UNDER GUNNER     FRONT GUNNER
Name                 Moore L.D.
Rounds fired          xxx
Opening range    xxxx
Closing range    xxxx
Stoppages             Nil
Training A.G.S.      No. 3 B & G Canada
O.T.U. & H.C.U.    No. 11 1657 C.U.
20. Were you able to cleaar stoppage?   N/A
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky? M/U     Other a/c seen
22. Loss of height during the attack     1,000 ft.
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     Nil
24. Damage to bomber       Nil
Casualties to crew     Nil
26. Damage to fighter     xxxx
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABBLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made
–

Document No. 167 – 168 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Russelsheim 25th of August 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/S Gerald Michael Francis Moore, RNZAF NZ421850
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I HK593 AA – H
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Roland Richard Chatfield, RNZAF NZ422937 – Rear Gunner. Sgt. J. Glendenning, RAFVR – –

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 25th of August 1944 Attack Against Russelsheim
Twenty eight aircraft took off as detailed to attack Russelsheim. Of these twenty five attacked the primary target and reported a good concentrated raid. A.A. opposition was slight, but enemy aircraft were active and one of our aircraft had two inconclusive combats. Another was unable to identify the target and jettisoned its load. A further one was caught in searchlights over the target and during evasive action lost both ailerons. This aircraft was captained by NZ424504 .F/S. O’Callaghan, E. The navigator 958564 .F/S. Hartley, R., kept the aircraft on track on the return journey even though his instruments were unserviceable and his chart lost. Two aircraft failed to return, they were captained by NZ422382 .F/O. J. Fleming and NZ421345 .F/S. Barker, R.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   25/26 Aug ’44   Target   Russelsheim   Group   3   Squadron   75 NZ
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lancaster I   A/C Letter & Serial No.   AA/H
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     .   Say whether servicable, u/s, or not used at time of combat   U/S
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     –
4. Time   00.45? Height   10,000 ft.   Heading   095?   Position (Lat & Long)   49:20 N. 09:00 E.
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD      On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       Good
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     Searchlights 4 miles to Port
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
9. Which equipment warned?   –   Immediate action taken?   Fired x x/x Strbd.
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   No
11. First Visual;   range     300 yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;     against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       –
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     Rear Gunner
13. Type of E.A.     S/E   No.   One     What lights on E/A     No
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Starboard Quarter Above
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Port Beam Down       Range     150
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Starboard
17. Did the fighter fire?   No   Opening range   No     Closing range   No
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.                          REAR GUNNER                              M.U. GUNNER
Name                     F/S Chatfield                                     Sgt. Glendening
Rounds fired          500                                150
Opening range 300 yds                             150 yds.
Closing range        150 yds                                               250 yds.
Stoppages              No                                     No
Training A.G.S.      No. 3 B & G Canada
O.T.U. & H.C.U.      11. O.T.U., 1653 C.U.                        11 O.T.U. 1653 C.U.
20. Were you able to cleaar stoppage?
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?     M/U   A/G     Other a/c seen
22. Loss of height during the attack     –
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     –
24. Damage to bomber       –
Casualties to crew     –
26. Dmage to fighter     Hits claimed
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABBLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made.

At 00:56 Hours at position 49:36 N. – 08:51 E. Lanc I AA/M No Monica U/S. was attacked from Starboard quarter Up range 700 yds, weather good, moonlight searchlights to Port. Rear Gunner sighted single engined enemy aircraft Starboard Quarter up 700 yds.Fired and gave corkscrew to starboard Fighter broke attack Port Down – Bomber resumed? course. Fighter immediately attacked again – Port Quarter Up 600 yds. Bomber immediately corkscrewd Port. Fighter not seen again. In neither of these attacks did the fighter fire. No claim made by the Rear Gunner.

DUPLICATE AS ABOVE

Document No. 169 – 170 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Russelsheim 25th of August 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/S Gerald Michael Francis Moore, RNZAF NZ421850
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I HK593 AA – H
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Roland Richard Chatfield, RNZAF NZ422937 – Rear Gunner. Sgt. J. Glendenning, RAFVR – –

Document No. 171 – 172 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Kiel 26th of August 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/S Murray Smith, RNZAF NZ425948
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III PB418 AA – C
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. B. Johnson, RAFVR – – Rear Gunner
, –

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 26th of August 1944 Attack Against Kiel
Twenty out of the twenty one aircraft detailed, took off and participated in a very concentrated raid against Kiel. Several crews were able to identify the target visually and confirm the accuracy of the bombing. Heavy A.A. fire was moderate and a few of our aircraft suffered slight damage. The aircraft captained by NZ421343 .A/F/L. V. Andrew, was hit by A.A. fire over the target causing serious leg injuries to the MU/Gnr. 1862898 .Sgt. Molony, M. and damage to the Mid upper turret and fuselage.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   26th August 1944   Target   Kiel   Group   3   Squadron   75(NZ)
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc III   A/C Letter & Serial No.   AA/C
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     .         Servicable
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?
4. Time   22.56 Height   18,000 ft.   Heading   134   Position (Lat & Long)   54deg N, 09deg 10′ E
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD      On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       Low Stratas
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     Searchlights flicked on to Lancaster and down to ground 3 times
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
9. Which equipment warned?   none   Immediate action taken?   Corkscrew Port & Fire
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   Yes
11. First Visual;   range     400 yards   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;    against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       –
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     Rear Gunner
13. Type of E.A.     FW.190   No.   One     What lights on E/A     None
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Port Quarter Down
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Starboard Beam Up       Range     300 yds.
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Port
17. Did the fighter fire?   No   Opening range   N/A     Closing range   N/A
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.                       REAR GUNNER       M.U. GUNNER     UNDER GUNNER     FRONT GUNNER
Name                           Johnson B.A.T.
Rounds fired              320
Opening range          400 yds.
Closing range            300 yds
Stoppages                 Nil
Training A.G.S.          12 A.G.S
O.T.U. & H.C.U.         11. O.T.U.    1651 H.C.U.
20. Were you able to cleaar stoppage?   N/A
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?       All except rear Gunner    Other a/c seen     Nil
22. Loss of height during the attack     1,000 ft.
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     Nil
24. Damage to bomber       Nil
Casualties to crew     Nil
26. Damage to fighter     Not Known
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED    No Claim

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made

Rear Gunner (Sergeant Johnson) saw enemy aircraft climbing towards Lancaster on Port Quarter Beam, at 400 yds range and ordered “corkscrew port” and opened fire with 4 second burst. Enemy aircraft broke away towards starboard beam up, range 300 yds. Did not open fire. Rear Gunner did not observe any hits on enemy aircraft. Shortly afterwards enemy aircrafy was seen by Rear Gunner to cross astern from starboard to port, at about 800 yds. range, but did not attack and was not seen again.

Document No. 173 – 174 (NOT LISTED IN AIR50/92 SERIES)
Op Details: Attack Against Stettin 29th if August 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/O John Harold Scott, RNZAF NZ428797
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk. I HK601 JN – D
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. Joseph Thomas Bayes, RAFVR 1595589, 185783 – Rear Gunner. Sgt. John Thomas Beardmore, RAFVR 1818755 – Mid Upper Gunner
, –

Form 541 diary report for Operation – Attack Against Stettin 29th if August 1944
Fourteen aircraft took off as detailed to attack Stettin and thirteen of these successfully bombed the target with the aid of markers. A good concentration of fires developed and all crews reported a successful raid. A.A. opposition was moderate and enemy fighters were active on the outward route. Three of our aircraft had combats, two being inconclusive but the third (Captain NZ428797 .P/O. J. Scott) claimed one enemy aircraft as probably destroyed. The aircraft captained by 1323677 .F/S. King, D., failed to return.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   29th August 1944   Target   Stettin   Group   3   Squadron   75 (NZ)
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc I   A/C Letter & Serial No.   JN/D HK601
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     .       Not used
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?
4. Time   00.36 hrs   Height   8,000 ft.   Heading   101 (T)   Position (Lat & Long)    56:xxN 11:40 E
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD         On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       xxxx xxxx cloud Half Moon
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     Nil
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
9. Which equipment warned?   –   Immediate action taken?   Corkscrew Port
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   Not used
11. First Visual;   range     700 yds yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;      against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       N/A
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     Rear Gunner
13. Type of E.A.     JU.88   No.   One     What lights on E/A   None
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Port Quarter slightly above
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Port Quarter Down       Range     500 yds
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Port
17. Did the fighter fire?   Yes   Opening range   Unknown range     Closing range   500 yds.
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
REAR GUNNER     M.U. GUNNER
Name                                Sgt. Bayes           F/S Beardmore
Rounds fired                   600                                                   300
Opening range                Unknown                                        500 yds
Closing range                  500 yds                                            500 yds
Stoppages                       nil                                                      nil
Training A.G.S.                2 A.G.S. Dalcross                             2 A.G.S. Dalcross
O.T.U. & H.C.U.               11 O.T.U. 1651 H.C.U.                    11 O.T.U. 1651 H.C.U.
20. Were you able to cleaar stoppage?   N/A
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?     Bomb Aimer and Mid Upper     Other a/c seen     none
22. Loss of height during the attack     1,000 ft.
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     None
24. Damage to bomber       None
Casualties to crew     None
26. Dmage to fighter     Not observed
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made.

First Attack was opened by enemy aircraft firing from unknown range, fine quarter up, aircraft immediately corkscrewed to port, Rear Gunner firing burst in direction of enemy trace. Enemy aircraft broke away at 500 yds., and Mid Upper fired on breakaway.

Second Attack from Port Quarter Down – unknown range, breaking away at 600 yds. Port Quarter Down. rear Gunner fired xxxx burst at seat of enemy trace, Mid Upper fired on breakaway – enemy aircraft out of sight, until breakaway in each case.

Third Attack from 700 yds. Port Quarter Down breaking away Port Up at 400 yds. Rear Gunner fired 6 second burst, and Mid Upper fired short burst on break away, Bomber corkscrewed Port immediately.

Fourth Attack From Port Fine Quarter, range 600 yds., both Rear Gunner and Mid Upper firing point blank on initial bank of attack, four -five second burst was given by Rear Gunner and one eight second burst by Mid Upper. The enemy aircraft was seen to fall on its back and fall out of control into cloud 1,000ft. below and was not seen again. No combat manouvere was used on this last attack and only on last attack were able to identify aircraft as a JU.88. Enemy aircraft did not fire on attacks 3 and 4.

Document No. 263 (twin page but only first page numbered) – (Held within 75(NZ) Squadron Appendices AIR27/649 – pages 402/403)
Op Details: Attack Against Coblenz 6th of November 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/O Martin Adam Kilpatrick, RNZAF NZ421919
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I HK562 AA – L
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. Robert ‘Bob’ Olive, RAFVR – Rear Gunner
, –

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 6th of November 1944 Attack Against Coblenz
Sixteen aircraft were detailed for a night attack against Coblenz carrying 8,000 lb; 4,000 lb; No.14 clusters; No.17 clusters; 4lb inc. Fifteen aircraft were successful. The aircraft captained by F/O T. Winter (152351) returned early on account of engine trouble. Crews were able to identify the target visually in clear weather and a good concentrated raid developed, with smoke rising to 10,000 feet. NZ421919 F/O Kilpatrick, M had a short inconclusive encounter with a JU.88. Flak was moderate to slight.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   6.11.44   Target   Coblenz   Group   3   Squadron   75NZ
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc I   A/C Letter & Serial No.   AA/L HK562
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     .       N/A
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     N/A
4. Time   19.22   Height   19,000   Heading   120T   Position (Lat & Long) 50.40N 06.40 E
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD       On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       Visibility good No moon or cloud
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat    No
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT   –
9. Which equipment warned?   N/A   Immediate action taken?   N/A
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   N/A
11. First Visual;   range     400    yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;     against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       N/A
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     Rear Gunner
13. Type of E.A.     JU.88   No.   one     What lights on E/A     N/A
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Port quarter level
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Stbd quarter down       Range     250 yds.
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Port
17. Did the fighter fire?   No   Opening range   N/A     Closing range   N/A
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.                            REAR GUNNER       M.U. GUNNER   UNDER GUNNER     FRONT GUNNER
Name                      Sgt. Oliver
Rounds fired         200
Opening range     300 yds
Closing range       250 yds
toppages               nil
Training A.G.S.     No. 12 A.G.S.
O.T.U. & H.C.U.   1653 H.C.U.
20. Were you able to cleaar stoppage?   N/A
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?     MUG/ WOP     Other a/c seen     No
22. Loss of height during the attack     1,000 ft.
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     Nil
24. Damage to bomber       Nil
Casualties to crew     Nil
26. Dmage to fighter     Not observed
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABBLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED     Nil

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made

Own aircraft Lanc. I HK562 Height 19,000 position 50.40N 06.40 E on a course of 120 T Rear Gunner sighted J.U.88 on Port Quarter Level at 400 yds gave order to corkscrew to Port. Rear gunner firing short burst (200 rd from 300 – 250 yds) Enemy aircraft breaking away Starboard Quarter. No hits observed. Fighter not seen again.

Document No. 276 (twin page but only first page numbered) – (Held within 75(NZ) Squadron Appendices AIR27/649 – pages 416/417)
Op Details: Mining in the Heligoland Bight 30th of December 1944
Pilot of aircraft: F/O Eric George Parsons, RAFVR 185301
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.III LM544 AA – J
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. John Nichol, RAFVR 1670779 – Rear Gunner
, –

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 30th of December 1944 Mining in the Heligoland Bight
No bombing operations were laid on but four aircraft were required for mining by special equipment in the Heligoland Bight area. All were successful and planted mines as ordered. There was some enemy air activity, three of our aircraft reporting fighters of E/A. One of these, AA”J” captained by F/O E. Parsons, was in combat in which E/A was claimed as damaged.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   30.12.44   Target   Mining Heligoland   Group   3   Squadron   75
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc III   A/C Letter & Serial No.   J. LM544
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     . Not in Use
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?     N/A
4. Time   19.07   Height   10,000   Heading   270   Position (Lat & Long)    53.53N 0744E
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD      On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)     7 miles Moon port quarter & Cloudy
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     Flak Astern prior to Attack
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT   Visual
9. Which equipment warned?   N/A   Immediate action taken?   Diving turn to Starboard
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   N/A
11. First Visual;   range     450    yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;        against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       N/A
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     Rear Gunner
13. Type of E.A.     JU.88   No.   1     What lights on E/A     1 light on side of fuselage
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Curve of pursuit from starboard beam up
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Port down       Range     300yds.
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Diving turn starboard into cloud
17. Did the fighter fire?   No   Opening range   N/A     Closing range   –
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.                         REAR GUNNER       M.U. GUNNER     UNDER GUNNER     FRONT GUNNER
Name                    Sgt. Nichol
Rounds fired        200
Opening range 450
Closing range      300
Stoppages            1 Gun stoppage
Training A.G.S.    No.3 B & G’s , MacDonald, Canada
O.T.U. & H.C.U. 28 O.T.U. Wymeswold 1668 H.C.U.Bottisford
20. Were you able to cleaar stoppage?   yes
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?     M/U     Other a/c seen     None
22. Loss of height during the attack     1000
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat
24. Damage to bomber       None
Casualties to crew     None
26. Dmage to fighter     none
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABBLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED     N/A

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made.

On 30/12/44 at Pos 53..5 N, 07.44 E at 1907 Lanc III LM544 the Rear Gunner sighted Ju.88 with lights on starboard beam up at 450 yds. The Rear Gunner gave instructions to dive starbaord into cloud also opening fire until breakaway at 300 on Port quarter down. No Hits observed, enemy aircraft did not open fire. At 1928 Rear Gunner sighted enemy aircraft in Port Quarter Up at 400″ Gunner gave corkscrew Port. Rear Gunner and enemy aircraft opening fire simultaneously at 300″. Hits were observed on the aircraft by M/U and Rear Gunner. Enemy aircraft broke away at 230″. Aircraft claimed as damaged.

Document No. 289 (twin page but only first page numbered) – (Held within 75(NZ) Squadron Appendices AIR27/649 – pages 430/431)
Op Details: Attack Against Wanne Eickel 16th of January 1945
Pilot of aircraft: F/S John Henry Thomas Wood, RNZAF NZ426235
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I HK597 JN – P
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Ralph Charles Sparrow, RCAF R.263518 – Rear Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 16th of January 1945 Attack Against Wanne Eickel
Seventeen aircraft attacked Wanne Hickel in ten tenths cloud, tops 6/7000 feet, carrying 4,000 H.C., 500 G.P. 500 ANM, 500 M.C. 250 G.P. and Munro bombs. Crews bombed with the aid of instruments and sky markers. Flak was moderate. The general impression was that bombing was concentrated on markers and red glow seen through cloud. The aircraft captained by NZ426235 F/S Wood, J, was attacked by a F.W. 190. The rear gunner opened fire, but no hits were observed and our aircraft suffered no damage. The aircraft captained by NZ414376 F/L T. Blewett unfortunately crashed in this country. The captain and Air Bomber NZ426234 F/O J. Wilson were killed. The Navigator 1398282 F/S Cornell, B.T. died later as a result of severe injuries.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   16.1.45   Target   Wanne Eickel   Group   3   Squadron   No.75(NZ)
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lancaster Mk.I   A/C Letter & Serial No.   JN/B HK587
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T     .    None
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?    N/A
4. Time   02.41? Height   18,000   Heading   272   Position (Lat & Long)   51.1.N 0.6 E.
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD      On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       10/10 5000′ below
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     light flak on target prior to combat
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
9. Which equipment warned?   N/A   Immediate action taken?   N/A
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   N/A
11. First Visual;   range     300   yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;     against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       N/A
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     Rear Gunner
13. Type of E.A.     FW.190   No.   1     What lights on E/A     None
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Port Quarter Down
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Stbd. Qtr. Down       Range     150 yds.
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Port
17. Did the fighter fire?   Yes   Opening range   300     Closing range   150
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.                             REAR GUNNER
Name                        F/S Sparrow R.C. Can
Rounds fired            300
Opening range        300 yds
Closing range          150 yds.
Stoppages                none
Training A.G.S.         No.3 B & G’s , MacDonald Man, Canada
O.T.U. & H.C.U.         No.12 Chipping Warden
20. Were you able to cleaar stoppage?   N/A
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?     W.O.P.     Other a/c seen     None
22. Loss of height during the attack     Approx. 500 ft.
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     None
24. Damage to bomber       None
Casualties to crew     None
26. Dmage to fighter     None Observed
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABBLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED     –

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made

At 16.1.45. at position 51.13 N. 06 E. at 0241 Lancaster Mk.I HK.597 Rear Gunner sighted a F.W.190 against light cloud attacking from Port Quarter Down at 300 yards. Rear Gunner gave order to Corkscrew Port and opened fire. E/A closed in and opened fire was held to closing range of 150 yards then broke off attack to Starboard Quarter down. No hits were observed on E/A which did not make further attack.

Document No. 290 (twin page but only first page numbered) – (Held within 75(NZ) Squadron Appendices AIR27/649 – pages 432/433)
Op Details: Attack Against Dessau 7th of March 1945
Pilot of aircraft: F/L Sidney Lewis ‘Buzz’ Spillman, RNZAF NZ413138
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I LM276 AA – S
Details of crew listed in report: F/S Vernon Alfred ‘Vern’ Clouston, RNZAF NZ428285 – Mid Upper Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 7th of March 1945 Attack Against Dessau
Thirteen aircraft attacked Dessau as ordered. Aircraft bombed in 10/10ths haze and thin cloud. Crews were given instructions by M/B to bomb on Skymarkers but some were able to make out T.I’s and in two cases identify the street. Fires were burning over a wide area when aircraft left the target. Flak practically nil in target area. Some E/A were seen and AA”S” F/L Spilman had a short inconclusive encounter. A satisfactory operation.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   7.3.45   Target   Dessau   Group   3   Squadron   75NZ
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lanc I   A/C Letter & Serial No.   AA/S LM276
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T        u/s
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?    N/A
4. Time   21.02   Height   18,000   Heading   49   Position (Lat & Long)    51.36 N 09.31 E.
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD        On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       Clear with thin stratus 6,000
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     –
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
9. Which equipment warned?   N/A   Immediate action taken?   M/U opened Fire & ordered Corkscrew Port
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   N/A
11. First Visual;   range     600 yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;       against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       N/A
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?     Mid Upper Gunner
13. Type of E.A.     FW.190   No.   1     What lights on E/A     None
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Port Quarter Above
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Stbd. Qtr. Down diving vertically         Range     300 yds.
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Port
17. Did the fighter fire?   No   Opening range   N/A     Closing range   N/A
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.             REAR GUNNER           M.U. GUNNER       UNDER GUNNER     FRONT GUNNER
Name                                             F/S Clouston
Rounds fired    100
Opening range                             600 yds
Closing range                               300 yds
Stoppages                                    None (Guns put out by interuptor
Training A.G.S.   No.3 B & G’s Canada
O.T.U. & H.C.U.                            11 O.T.U. 1651 H.C.U.
20. Were you able to clear stoppage?   N/A
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?     Rear Gunner & W/Op     Other a/c seen     None
22. Loss of height during the attack     1000 ft.
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     Fishpond U/S
24. Damage to bomber       None
Casualties to crew     None
26. Dmage to fighter     Hits observed on Wings and Fuselage
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABBLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made.

On 7.3.45 at Pos. 51.36 N 09.31 E at 21.02 Lancaster I L.M. 276 the mid upper gunner sighted a FW.190 attacking from the Port Quarter Above at 600 yds, he immediately opened fire and gave order to corkscrew Port holding constant fire until E/A broke away at 300 yds to Stbd. Quarter Down, diving vertically. Hts were observed on wings and fuselage of E/A which did not open fire and did not make a further attack. This F./.W 190 claimed as damaged

Document No. 263 (twin page but only first page numbered) – (Held within 75(NZ) Squadron Appendices AIR27/649 – pages 434/435)
Op Details: Attack on Potsdam 14th of Aprill 1945
Pilot of aircraft: F/O Allan Ralph Baynes, RNZAF NZ427453
Aircraft details: Lancaster Mk.I PB132 AA – T
Details of crew listed in report: Sgt. G. Bentham, RAFVR – Rear Gunner

Form 541 diary report for Operation – 14th of Aprill 1945 Attack on Potsdam
25 aircraft were detailed to attack POTSDAM. There was no cloud and visibility was good. A very concentrated attack developed and the target was well alight by the time the last aircraft were on their way home. Flak was slight and bursting well below stream. AA’T’ (F/O A.R. Baynes) was attacked by two enemy aircraft believed to be JU.88’s 20 miles S.W. of Potsdam on the homeward journey. The Flight Engineer (Sgt. Sliman) was killed by canon shell.

COMBAT REPORT PRO-FORMA
(Fill in for all ‘Attacks’ and ‘Combats’)

1. Date   14-15/4/45   Target   Potsdam   Group   3   Squadron   75 NZ
2. A/C Type and Mark   Lancaster I   A/C Letter & Serial No.   AA. T.
3. Special Equipment carried: AURAL MONICA/ VISUAL MONICA/ FISHPOND/ BOOZER/ BOOZER II/ A.I. IV/ A.I. V/ A.G.L.T       Not used
Was the operator TRAINED/ UNTRAINED?
4. Time   23.18   Height   9,000ft.   Heading   296T   Position (Lat & Long)   51.40N. 12.10E
5. OUTWARD/ TARGET/ HOMEWARD       On track/ off track/ early return
6. Weather (cloud, moon & position relative to bomber, visibility etc.)       Visibility Good Dark Sky
7. Searchlight activity, flares, flak etc. prior to or during combat     Searchlights, flak prior
8. What was the first warning?   VISUAL/ FIRE FROM UNSEEN AIRCRAFT/ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT   V
9. Which equipment warned?   N/A   Immediate action taken?   –
10. If the first warning was not on special equipment, did it warn later   N/A
11. First Visual;   range     1,000 yds. yds;   position PORT/ STARBD, ASTERN/ QUARTER, BEAM/ BOW/ AHEAD/ ABOVE/ LEVEL/ BELOW;    against LIGHT/ DARK SKY
How long after first early warning?       N/A
12. Which member of crew obtained first visual?      Mid Upper
13. Type of E.A.     JU.88   No.   2     What lights on E/A     N/A
14. Direction of Attack or Approach   Head-on Starboard Bow Down
15. Direction of breakaway of E.A.     Starboard Qutr. Down       Range     300 yards
16. What combat manoeuvre was taken?     Corkscrew Starboard
17. Did the fighter fire?   Yes   Opening range   Unknown     Closing range   Unknown
18. Who opened fire first FIGHTER/ R. GUNNER/ M.U. GUNNER/ UNDER GUNNER/ FRONT GUNNER
19.                REAR GUNNER       M.U. GUNNER      UNDER GUNNER     FRONT GUNNER
Name                          Sgt. Bentham
Rounds fired              350
Opening range
Closing range      N/A
Stoppages       none
Training A.G.S.          7. A.G.S.
O.T.U. & H.C.U.    11 O.T.U. 1653 C.U.
20. Were you able to clear stoppage?   N/A
21. Which crew position was searching away from the attack or in the dark part of the sky?     M.U     Other a/c seen     JU.88
22. Loss of height during the attack     400 feet
23. Mechanical defects or damage previously sustained affecting combat     None
24. Damage to bomber       Damage to nose of Aircraft
25. Casualties to crew     Engineer killed
26. Damage to fighter     Not Known
27. Fighter claimed DESTROYED/ PROBABBLY DESTROYED/ DAMAGED     N/A

NARRATIVE
Fill in for a. All Attacks
b. All Combats when claims of E/A destroyed probably destroyed and damaged are made.

On 14-15th April 1945, Lancaster I AA.t at 51deg 40 N 12deg 10E at 23.15 on a heading of 296 T, Mid Gunner sighted 2 JU.88s on Starboard down and gave the order to corkscrew starboard. No.1 JU.88 attacked killing the Engineer whilst the other remained out at 400 yards. The attacking aircraft broke away starboard quarter down and was given a long burst by the rear gunner. No hits observed.

At 23.26 at 51-45N 11.30E on a heading of 296T at a height of 9,000 feet Lancaster aircraft was again attacked by 2 JU.88s( not showing any lights) from dead astern down at 750 yards. The rear gunner ordered pilot to corkscrew starboard and this attacking aircraft firing at the same time. Very little damage was done to the rear turret. Direction of break away during the attack was not seen, and the rear gunner did not open fire owing to the hydraulics being shot away. The second JU.88 did not attack but acted as a decoy as in the first attack.

75(nz)squadron

About my father and the aircrews of 75(NZ) Squadron RAF – the largest online resource for 75(NZ) Squadron RAF in the world

Combat Reports AIR 50/192 series

AIR 50/192 Combat Report Series – 75(NZ) Squadron RAF

AIR 50/192 Combat Report Series – 75(NZ) Squadron RAF

Share this:

Like this: